|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
: US Embassy
Bombings
The Nairobi terror-bombing: some issues not considered in
the American media
By Martin McLaughlin
15 August 1998
The two bombs which exploded outside the US embassies in Nairobi,
Kenya and Dar es-Salaam, Tanzania caused a severe toll of dead
and wounded--more than 260 killed, by the latest count, and over
5,500 wounded.
The Nairobi bomb was especially devastating because the embassy
is located at a busy intersection in the crowded downtown sector
of the city. The bomb blast destroyed a neighboring office building,
which pancaked to the street, and destroyed several buses filled
with workday passengers.
US investigators said the blast was the result of an estimated
600 pounds of high explosive, delivered by a pickup truck equipped
with a covered flatbed. They said the power of such an explosion
was so great that, if the truck had gained entry to the underground
garage beneath the embassy, the entire structure would have collapsed.
The damage and loss of life inside the embassy were heavy, despite
extensive efforts to reinforce the structure and improve its security
during the previous year.
In the wake of the bombing, with no evidence yet made public
that would connect the terrorist attack with any organization
or government, the American media remains filled with speculation
about a possible American military action against Iran, Iraq or
some other Middle East target. This would likely take the form
of an attack by high-altitude bombers or by cruise missiles on
cities such as Baghdad, Teheran or Tripoli.
One might ask, if a single 600-pound bomb could do such damage
in Nairobi, what must be the impact of a large number of similar
bombs dropped on a modern city? The ordnance used by the US Air
Force is superior in destructive power to that employed by the
terrorists in East Africa. Most American bombs are in the 750-pound
to 2,000-pound range, up to three times the size of the bomb which
destroyed so many lives in Kenya.
Less than six months ago, the Clinton administration came to
the brink of launching air or missile strikes against Iraqi targets,
in what was widely predicted to be the largest bombing raid on
Baghdad since the Persian Gulf war. US government officials refused
to estimate in advance how many Iraqis--men, women and children--would
have died in such a raid.
The Pentagon and CIA dismiss such mass casualties, in typically
bureaucratic language, as "collateral damage." But if
one 600-pound bomb in Nairobi kills 250 people and wound over
5,000, how many could a hundred or a thousand such bombs kill
in Baghdad, a city similar to Nairobi in size and density of population?
Would 25,000 people have died? Or even 250,000? Would half a million
have been wounded? Or even more?
The example of Nairobi also reveals the cynicism of claims
that American laser-guided "smart" bombs are a more
humane weapon because they hit their targets more frequently than
conventional bombs. The Nairobi bomb was certainly delivered with
great accuracy against its target, exploding within a few feet
of the back gate of the US embassy. But the result was colossal
damage to neighboring buildings and the death of hundreds of innocent
people.
During the Persian Gulf war, the Bush administration consistently
refused to issue any estimates on the number of Iraqi soldiers
or civilians killed in its two-month-long campaign of saturation
bombing, which targeted cities like Baghdad and Basra. While the
government claimed that there was not enough information to make
a credible estimate, the real reason was political: to prevent
a public outcry, within the United States and internationally,
once the real scale of the destruction of human life was made
clear.
See Also:
Questions mount in Kenya, Tanzania bombings
US government, Israeli intelligence had advance warning
[13 August 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |