|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Film
Reviews
A painter and his hell
Love is the Devil--study for a portrait of Francis
Bacon: a film by John Maybury
By Elaine Gorton
17 October, 1998
Love is the Devil is the first feature-length film directed
and written by John Maybury, who is known for his short films,
adverts and music videos. It is based on the book, The Gilded
Gutter Life of Francis Bacon. The film was well received at
the Cannes Film Festival and went on general release from September
18.
The story is a familiar one. Lovers meet from very different
social backgrounds; everything that attracts them ultimately repels
them and it all ends in tears. The difference is that the tragic
lovers are a world-renowned artist Francis Bacon (Derek Jacobi),
and George Dyer (Daniel Craig), a petty criminal who rubs shoulders
with the notorious London gangsters, the Kray twins.
Bacon is a crucial artistic figure. Widely held to be one of
Britain's most significant painters of the twentieth century,
he was born in Ireland but spent his formative years in Germany
between the First and Second World Wars. His outlook was significantly
shaped by the social and political struggles of the time, from
which he drew profoundly negative conclusions. Fascism's triumph
convinced Bacon that the left-wing idealism of his Berlin contemporaries
ran contrary to human nature. He celebrated what he considered
to be the dark soul of humanity. Man was a beast and civilisation
a thin veneer. The Second World War confirmed him in these views.
Sex and death were life's only constants. Together with the persecution
suffered by homosexuals, these experiences spurred on the inner
demons that haunted Bacon and lent his paintings their ugly fascination
and power. "I am optimistic about nothing," Bacon says
again and again in the film.
We meet Bacon at the height of his success. He is feted by
both the Soho avant-garde and the establishment. His paintings
fetch large sums. Yet it is not difficult to understand how Bacon
finds the figure of Dyer fascinating. They meet as the result
of a botched burglary on Bacon's home. But instead of turning
Dyer over to the police, he offers him whatever he wants in return
for sex. Bacon has found his muse. Here is someone who epitomises
Bacon's sexual and emotional ideals; a big, seemingly brutal and
certainly brutalised man who has the "qualities
of innocence and amorality", a contradiction that Bacon would
find easy to reconcile. As for Dyer, he is an opportunist who
thinks he has struck gold. He asks Bacon, "You actually make
money out of painting?"
The two fall in love against the odds and
despite the social divide that separates them. But Bacon tries
to change Dyer. He wants him to be strong and domineering, an
idealised male figure--his "Lucifer", his "fallen
angel". He encourages Dyer to beat him during their lovemaking
and tries to integrate him into his circle of friends. Dyer feels
very uncomfortable in this milieu. Paradoxically Bacon is unhappy
with the changes Dyer does undergo. When Dyer falls in love and
reveals his emotional vulnerability, Bacon feels somehow let down.
He cannot cope with the increasing mental problems with which
Dyer suffers. The relationship degenerates, becomes increasingly
violent. Dyer is desperate, tries to cling onto Bacon, who resents
his dependence. In the end he commits suicide.
The link between Bacon's relationship with Dyer and his art
is a complex subject to deal with. It was made
more difficult still by the refusal of Bacon's estate to allow
the use of any of his paintings. An understanding of the nature
of Bacon's work, his depiction of man as animal, as flesh, often
grotesquely distorted and butchered, would have served to illustrate
and confirm the film's themes. In seeking to overcome these difficulties,
Maybury has two major assets working in his favour: a fine cast
(particularly in Jacobi) and a visual flair combined with sophisticated
film and audio technique.
So much of the film hangs on its ability to create a visual
style that reproduces Bacon's vision. Indeed this is its most
successful aspect. The film opens with Bacon grieving the death
of George. The scene is set in a spartan bedroom. Bacon sits on
the edge of the bed, his head buried in George's pillow, weeping.
The camera sweeps up to view the character from above. There are
many such shots. The world created for Bacon by Maybury is a claustrophobic,
subterranean hell that George has the misfortune to fall into.
We see the figure of Dyer tumbling in blackness and landing in
a room daubed with red and black and covered with black and white
photographs of the dead and dying, resembling the den of a serial
killer rather than a painter's studio.
The scene is lit from above, as is most of the film. There
is a large round mirror in the background that distorts the reflected
image. The use of reflection is one of the main devices used by
Maybury to allude to Francis Bacon's paintings. Mirrors are used
to repeat and layer images, resembling Bacon's use of the triptych.
Water and shots through glasses and bottles distort faces and
forms.
The strong directional light serves two main purposes. The
intense shadows exaggerate the physical form and create the sense
of being underground. The film is largely set in a series of interiors.
These contrast group scenes involving Bacon, his acolytes and
peers (usually characterised by venomous gossip) with more intimate
moments between Bacon and Dyer. Colour is used imaginatively.
The predominant greys and greens of the opening scenes become
more and more red until the film reaches its climax in Dyer's
death in a vivid scarlet hotel room.
Other aspects of Love is the Devil are less successful.
Style to some extent substitutes for substance. Maybury fails
to sustain the story. It seems overlong and unduly disjointed,
held together only by Jacobi's first person narration. Certain
references are clumsy and laboured--images of falling, the spiral
staircase motif appropriated from Alfred Hitchcock. There is little
attempt made to place Bacon's relationship to Dyer in a broader
social context. Its makers boast that this was their intention.
"We were more interested in a film which reflected the mood
and atmosphere of the paintings than a film which reflected the
period," said producer Chiara Menage. Despite its flaws,
however, this remains an interesting cinematic work.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |