ON THE
WSWS
Donate
to
the WSWS!
News Feed
Contact
the
WSWS
Editorial
Board
New
Today
News
& Analysis
Workers
Struggles
Arts
Review
History
Science
Polemics
Philosophy
Correspondence
Archive
About
WSWS
About
the ICFI
Help
Books
Online
OTHER
LANGUAGES
German
French
Italian
Russian
Polish
Czech
Serbo-Croatian
Spanish
Portuguese
Turkish
Sinhala-
Tamil
Indonesian
LEAFLETS
Download
in
PDF format
|
|
WSWS : Arts
Review
AFI's 100 Greatest Movies: Some serious questions
By David Walsh
18 June 1998
The American Film Institute's celebration of a century of filmmaking
in the US could have been an extraordinary event. Instead, both
the list of the supposed 100 greatest American movies and the
June 17 three-hour CBS special during which the list was revealed
were predictable and mediocre.
The CBS program was disgraceful. How does one go about rendering
boring and innocuous the presentation of such a rich and suggestive
history? Hardly any of the comments went beyond the gushing, the
superficial and the obvious. The selection of commentators played
no small role in this. There is no apparent reason why the opinions
on the film arts of, for example, broadcasters Dan Rather and
Walter Cronkite, talk show host Larry King, singer Carly Simon
or magician David Copperfield should be of any interest. It seemed
something of an intellectual conflict of interest as well that
nearly all the directors interviewed--including Woody Allen, Sidney
Lumet, Martin Scorsese, William Friedkin and Steven Spielberg--had
one or more of their films on the list. Were they expected to
provide some critical overview? Everyone was too busy pontificating
or patting everyone else on the back for any serious analysis
to emerge.
The celebration was a thoroughly tame and establishment affair.
Was one supposed to be pleased to read in an Institute press release
that the AFI would "be joined in this celebration of movie
excellence by some of the world's most prestigious corporations,
led by General Motors' Cadillac Division, who want to be part
of the magic, glamour and excitement of not just one great movie,
but the 100 greatest movies ever made"? Note here the intrusion
of nationalism: not the 100 greatest American movies ever
made, but the 100 greatest movies ever made.
The entire business was somewhat tainted, in my view, by the
fact that representatives of the major studios took part in the
selection of the 100 films, the same studios that will now join
with the AFI in vigorously marketing videos of those films.
The list itself included at least two dozen films that, in
my opinion, obviously did not belong there, including Lawrence
of Arabia, The Wizard of Oz, The Bridge on the River Kwai, Star
Wars, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, E.T., Midnight Cowboy,
West Side Story, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, The Sound of
Music, Fantasia, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Tootsie, Close Encounters
of the Third Kind, The Silence of the Lambs, The French Connection,
Forrest Gump, Ben-Hur, Dances with Wolves, American Graffiti,
Rocky, Unforgiven and Guess Who's Coming to Dinner,
and several dozen more that probably did not.
The list included no films by Buster Keaton, Robert Flaherty,
Josef von Sternberg, Preston Sturges, King Vidor, Ernst Lubitsch,
Raoul Walsh, Frank Borzage, Otto Preminger, Douglas Sirk, Erich
von Stroheim or Anthony Mann, nor any of the American films of
Jean Renoir, Max Ophuls, F.W. Murnau or Fritz Lang. Remarkably,
the list included no film with either Greta Garbo or Marlene Dietrich.
Was this again the nationalist element, or simply insensitivity?
Charlie Chaplin's The Gold Rush (his most highly-ranked
film) came in seventy-fourth place, behind Forrest Gump
(71) and just ahead of Dances with Wolves (75). D.W. Griffith
made the list with only one film; in all, only two silent films
were selected. The voters chose one work by Howard Hawks, which
turned up ninety-seventh. Orson Welles's Citizen Kane finished
in first place, but none of the director's other films rated placement
in the top 100. Steven Spielberg placed five films on the AFI
list, the only director to be so rewarded, while Francis Ford
Coppola placed three, the same number as John Ford. Four of Alfred
Hitchcock's films were selected, but Vertigo (61) placed
behind Raiders of the Lost Ark (60), Fantasia (58)
and The Sound of Music (55).
All in all, a worshipful attitude toward box office success,
limited knowledge of film history and present-day market concerns
seem to have governed the selection process. A poor showing.
See Also:
Recommended
videos by David Walsh
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |