Interview with Dervis Zaim,
director of Somersault in a Coffin
By David Walsh
20 October 1997
David Walsh: These days films about ordinary people
are very rare. Why did you choose such a subject?
Dervis Zaim: Because it's a subject really close to
me. I saw these people around. Actually, the main character is based on
a real person. Besides, the environment in Turkey, in Istanbul, is so much
like this. This is a low-budget, no-budget film. No institution helped us.
We produced it with friends, by guerrilla filmmaking, and this helped me
to think more independently. The market dictates certain kinds of thinking,
of aesthetic production. Since I had relatively free conditions, I was able
to talk about this guy, his environment, Turkey's environment as well.
DW: What are the social conditions in Istanbul today?
DZ: Poverty is growing day by day. Turkey is in the
process of integrating itself into the capitalist system. It is speeding
up. These are the consequences of this process. Every day more people lose
their jobs. The level of hunger, which was something rare 20 years ago,
is increasing. All these things affect my thinking. Besides, I like Italian
neorealism. My aesthetic choices, together with the conditions, prompted
me to do this film.
DW: Do you have difficulties with your government?
DZ: This is my first film. Up to now I haven't had any
difficulties. We produced this film independently. Censorship is less severe
now, compared with five or six years ago. You needed enormous determination
to make a film ten years ago.
DW: Is there an audience for your film in Turkey?
DZ: Americanization, standardization is everywhere around
the world. People want Terminator. These are the films that enjoy
box office success. My film is not successful in this sense. Thirty thousand
people have seen it, in the big cities. Distribution is a big problem for
me. You know the problem, you make a film but you are not able to distribute
it.
DW: American films are everywhere?
DZ: You cannot believe it, in every single theater.
Even in small towns. The production level of Turkish cinema is decreasing
year by year. Fifteen years ago there were forty films a year made, now
there are less than fifteen. If we make that many the press and the critics
are happy. Fifteen films is good for Turkey now.
DW: What influence can or should art have on the lives
of people?
DZ: It's not an immediate effect, of course. I don't
think that people see a film and go to change their lives immediately. This
is a long-term process. It takes time. But in the long run, I think people
can change from films they have seen. At least I have changed in this process.
I am not the same person I was before I started to make this film. There
is hope.
DW: What is the relationship between film and reality?
DZ: I believe in fiction. All art is fiction, after
all. You have to fictionalize everything in order to give it a truly realistic
sense. It is a very complicated concept. The problems of the external world
interest me. Postmodernism, that sort of thing, is a luxury for us. Between
these two extremes, fiction and reality, together both of them create the
film itself. I'm fictionalizing something, but I'm careful not to take it
too far from reality.
DW: Why do you make films?
DZ: First of all, personally, I feel better when I make
films. I tried to be an insurance salesman. After two months, I quit. Filmmaking
in Third World countries is dangerous. You put yourself in danger. I like
making films. I like the rhythm of directing, of watching, of writing, even
of trying to find money. I even like this painful stage. Of course there
are other things, a lot of problems in the outside world. I want to represent
these problems, to create these celluloid works. These concerns are integrated
into my personal situation and feelings.
See also:
Thoughts about the 1997 Toronto film festival
Film, social reality and authenticity
[6 October 1997]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |