|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Germany
Germany: What lies behind the attempts to ostracise the Left
Party?
By Ulrich Rippert
3 March 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A sharp controversy has developed regarding how Germanys
established parties should deal with the Left Party, which won
sufficient votes last week to enter the Hamburg state legislature.
With its new presence in the Hamburg legislature, the Left Party
now has representation in 10 of Germanys 16 state parliaments.
It is not only the conservative Christian Democratic Union
(CDU) and Christian Social Union (CSU) that have responded in
knee-jerk fashion, resorting to the crudest forms of anti-communism.
The Social Democratic Party (SPD) is in the throes of a fierce
dispute on the question of the Left Party that threatens to tear
the party apart.
The controversy began following the Hesse state election five
weeks ago. On the eve of the poll, it was clear that the incumbent
state premier, Roland Koch (CDU), had not succeeded in mobilising
support with his racist campaign based on claims of a growing
number of foreign criminals, and he lost the election.
There were insufficient votes to form a majority centre-right
coalition consisting of the CDU and the Free Democratic Party
(FDP). Since the SPD and the Greens also failed to secure a majority,
Koch could be removed as state premier only with the support of
the Left Party.
Some media commentators have since called on the SPD to drop
its hostility to the Left Party and agree to form a coalition
government in Hesse, as the Social Democrats had done in Berlin
some years back. The pro-SPD news weekly Die Zeit ran the
headline Dare to Go Left! The newspaper called on
the SPD to stop demonising the Left Party in the west
of Germany. The Süddeutsche Zeitung said of the Left
Party: They are all honourable and dedicated people....
[T]hey could easily be in the SPD.
Two weeks later, just before the Hamburg vote, SPD leader Kurt
Beck suggested the partys lead candidate in Hesse, Andrea
Ypsilanti, might possibly allow herself be elected state premier
with the votes of the Left Party. There then ensued a hue and
cry from the CDU and the CSU and in the right-wing media, accusing
Beck and Ypsilanti of breaking their word and lying, since before
the election they had spoken out against any cooperation with
the Left Party.
Immediately after the Hamburg poll, the SPD right wing raised
its voice, criticising Becks left turn and launching
an aggressive counter-offensive.
Following the Hamburg election, the SPD and the Greens offered
to help the CDU secure a majority. They are determined to keep
CDU Mayor Ole von Beust in power, even though he lost the election
and no longer has a majority.
Von Beust originally came to power with the support of the
extreme right-wing Schill Party, launching harsh cuts in social
spending and attacking democratic rights. The SPD and the Greens
have justified their overtures towards the CDU by declaring that
they could not contemplate cooperation with the Left Party.
On election night, former Hamburg mayor Klaus von Dohnanyi
(SPD) stressed that there could be no question of cooperation
with the Left Party, however it was arranged. Speaking on
German television, Dohnanyi said, There can be no serious
collaboration with a party that rejects the free market foundations
of society.
Two days later, he added fuel to the fire in the tabloid Bild.
Dohnanyi told the newspaper that the SPD should make it clear
the Left Party had such an absurd programme, one could
not form a coalition with it. He declared, The SPD cannot
do anything together with the Left Party!
He added that the SPDs lead candidate in Hesse, Ypsilanti,
should not allow herself to be elected as state premier with the
votes of the Left Party under any circumstances.
Federal Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück (SPD) struck
a similar tone, saying the SPD should not govern in Hesse with
the support of the Left Party. To suggest otherwise,
he said, would be to jeopardise the credibility of the entire
SPD. Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD) also
lined up against party chief Beck.
On the Monday following the Hamburg election, the SPD executive
committee supported Kurt Becks position almost unanimously,
giving Ypsilanti the green light to form an administration supported
by the Left Party. But just hours later, executive committee members
said they did not feel bound by this resolution, saying party
leader Beck, who had been unable to attend the meeting due to
illness, would have faced fierce criticism if he had been present.
The right-wing Seeheim Circle within the SPD called
on Beck to immediately withdraw the resolution on relations with
the Left Party. The spokesman of this group, Johannes Kahrs, told
Bild, I consider Mondays executive committee
resolution to be wrong. I also do not believe that one can sit
out the protest. We demand that Beck overturn the resolution regarding
cooperation with the Left Party in the west German states.
Even long-time SPD cadre who have been in political retirement
for years, such as former defence minister Hans Apel, suddenly
raised their heads and spoke out. Apel declared, Mr. Beck
has deceived the voters, and done so deliberately. The Hamburg
SPD will not tolerate that! Otherwise, I would have to consider
whether it is still my party.
By Thursday, the Hamburg SPD had intensified its attack on
Beck. Stern magazine reported a three-page letter to Beck
from the SPDs lead candidate in Hamburg, Michael Naumann.
According to Stern, Naumann wrote that the SPD leader had
been driving the wrong way up the road, costing the
SPD at least 3 percent of the vote in Hamburg.
What is behind these hysterical attacks from the SPD right
wing?
The SPDs traditional anti-communism does not provide
a sufficient explanation, since many of the SPD right-wingers
have no reservations about maintaining contact with old-time Stalinists.
Moreover, Left Party leader Oskar Lafontaine is one of their own,
like most of the Left Partys functionaries in the west.
In 2004, Klaus von Dohnanyi was the representative sent by
the SPD-Green Party government headed by Chancellor Gerhard Schröder
to set up special economic zones in eastern Germany, where he
worked closely in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania with Employment
Minister Helmut Holter, at the time a member of the Party of Democratic
Socialism and today a member of the Left Party. Dohnanyi believes
that it would have been far better after the fall of the Berlin
Wall to have brought the middle- and lower-ranking Stalinist cadres,
who now form the backbone of the Left Party in the east, into
the SPD.
There must therefore be other reasons for the exclusion of
the Left Party. The main motivation is to declare illegitimate
any party that raises social questions and speaks about social
inequality, however superficially.
The right-wing SPD leaders know only too well that in all those
regions where the Left Party participates in government, it does
exactly the opposite of what it promises in its election campaigns.
But simply the fact that in its election propaganda the party
declares its opposition to the anti-welfare Agenda 2010 and calls
for the Hartz welfare reforms to be rescinded is enough
to brand it as a politically unacceptable.
The blow is aimed at the Left Party, but the real target is
those who voted for the party. In the eyes of the SPD right-wing,
the fact that tens of thousands have voted for this party is of
no relevance. Under no circumstances should mounting social resistance
find any expression in official politics.
It is no coincidence that the Hamburg SPD is spearheading these
attacks. For decades, the SPD has been dominated by right-wingers
closely connected to the bourgeoisie in this Hanseatic port. Trade
brought great wealth to the old merchant families, shipping companies
and Hamburgs well-to-do. The city, which boasts several
media barons, is home to more than 5,000 millionaires. Arrogance
and class snobbery have long been a hallmark of political life
in Hamburg.
At the beginning of the 1970s, when then-SPD leader Willy Brandt
was unable to hold back the working class, which had mobilised
in significant industrial struggles to win double-digit wage increases,
Helmut Schmidt rallied his Hanseatic power base to take over the
chancellorship and beat back the workers wage offensive.
The situation today is much more advanced. After seven years
of an SPD-Green Party federal government, and barely three years
of a grand coalition (CDU-CSU-SPD), social divisions have assumed
extreme forms. According to official statistics, the purchasing
power of those earning the lowest wages sank, on average, 13 percent
over the past 15 years.
People who have paid into the social insurance system for many
decades lose their benefits after just one or two years
unemployment, and are forced to accept low-wage jobs or live on
minimal welfare handouts. The impoverishment at the lower end
of society stands in reverse proportion to the unrestrained enrichment
at the top. This is why demands for a legal minimum wage and an
increase in the highest tax rates find growing popular support.
While Klaus von Dohnanyi insists that the economic reforms
introduced by Chancellor Schröder should be continued without
any amelioration, in order to make Germany competitive, the bad
news for German workers is piling up: the closure of the Nokia
factory in Bochum, mass redundancies at Siemens, BMW, Henkel,
and so on.
In view of increasing social tensions, the SPD right-wing seeks
to prevent any discussion on social inequality and suppress any
criticism of capitalist society. Hence its attacks on the Left
Party. Behind the façade and urbanity of Hamburgs
champagne socialists lies a clear message: The hoi polloi should
keep their traps shut!
On the other hand, party chief Beck, Andrea Ypsilanti and others
in the SPD leadership believe one can best continue with Agenda
2010 by integrating the Left Party into government on a regional
level, as Holger Börner once did with the Greens in Hesse,
and as demonstrated by Klaus Wowereit today in Berlin.
For its part, the Left Party has reacted to the right-wing
campaign by doing everything it can to prove its loyalty and reliability
to the state.
Top party officials use every opportunity to stress how close
they are to the SPDthat, although they think capitalist
society can be improved, they unreservedly recognise existing
property relations. They point to their government work in Berlin
and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania to prove that they can push
through welfare reforms, one-euro jobs and other unpopular
measures more affectively than other parties.
Instead of opposing the insolent attacks from the SPD, the
Left Party is reacting like a whipped dog and moving even further
to the right. Following the howls from the SPD, the Left Party
is responding with its own disciplinary measures.
The affair surrounding the DKP (Deutsche Kommunistische ParteiGerman
Communist Party) member Christel Wegner is characteristic. Wegner
was elected to the state parliament in Lower Saxony on the Left
Party slate. She gave a press interview after the election in
which she seemed to defend the Stasi secret police in the former
East Germany, saying, if one establishes another form of
society one needs such an organ...because one must
guard against the fact that reactionary forces could exploit the
situation and undermine the state from within.
Hardly had Wegner spoken when an outcry was heard from the
media. The news was spread that a Left Party deputy was demanding
the re-establishment of the Stasi and the rebuilding of the Berlin
Wall, although this was not what Wegner said. The Left Party executive
responded by immediately dissociating itself from Wegner, and
two days later she was expelled from the partys state parliamentary
faction.
See Also:
Germany: CDU woos the Greens
in Hamburg state election
[28 February 2008]
Hesse after the election
Germanys Left Party woos the SPD
[15 February 2008]
An exchange on the result
of the election in Hesse, Germany
[14 February 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |