|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: France
France considers sending more troops to Afghanistan
By Kumaran Ira
12 March 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On February 26, French daily Le Monde published a report
suggesting that Paris is considering the deployment of hundreds
of additional troops outside Kabul in Afghanistan.
According to Le Monde, the government of President Nicolas
Sarkozy is developing a new French policy on Afghanistan. Deployment
of troops would be to zones of potentially fierce fighting, preferably
the eastern region of Afghanistan close to the tribal areas of
Pakistan, to combat Al Qaeda militants, the paper reported.
Sarkozys spokesman David Martinon declined to confirm or
deny the report. He told Reuters, The president has not
made a decision. We are in discussion with our partners inside
NATO, but not exclusively.
Sarkozys decision to dispatch more troops, especially
to the areas where anti-occupation fighting is the fiercest, would
represent a significant shift in French foreign policy. During
his one-day visit to Afghanistan on December 22 of last year,
Sarkozy did not commit himself to more involvement of French troops,
though he emphasised Frances long-term political and military
presence there. The report coincides with demands by the US government,
which has intensified pressure on European allies to send more
troops to the volatile southern regions of Afghanistan and has
criticised its allies for failing to support the Afghan mission.
Since the US-led occupation began in 2001, US and NATO forces
have been facing growing popular opposition. The growing insurgency
against occupation forces has intensified especially in the south.
The occupation forces have been suffering the heaviest losses
of the war recently. So far, the US, Canada, Britain, the Netherlands,
Denmark and Romania have deployed troops in the southern region.
These countries have asked other European allies to send more
troops into this region or to allow their forces in the relatively
safer northern and western areas of Afghanistan to be moved south.
In early February, Canadawhich has 2,500 troops in Afghanistans
volatile southern Kandahar provincewarned NATO that it would
bring its troops home at the end of their current mandate in February
2009, unless NATO allies deployed more troops to the areas where
the fighting is the fiercest. Meantime, Canadian Prime Minister
Stephen Harper contacted Sarkozy to request reinforcements of
soldiers and materiel if Canada is to remain in Afghanistan. The
deployment of additional French troops to eastern Afghanistan
would permit American troops there to move to Kandahar province
to fight alongside the Canadians, Le Monde noted.
At a NATO defence ministers meeting in the Lithuanian
capital, Vilnius, in early February, the US and other nations
with troops in the Afghan south called for other NATO countries
to send more troops to that region. At the end of January, US
Defence Secretary Robert Gates sent a letter to NATO allies, particularly
Germany and France, demanding more commitment of troop deployment
and military equipment to southern Afghanistan.
Germany, which has some 3,200 soldiers deployed in relatively
peaceful northern Afghanistan, has been reluctant to do so, because
two thirds of the German population oppose the German military
mission in Afghanistan. France has not yet committed itself to
more deployment of troops, reacting in the same fashion as Germany.
France currently has about 1,600 troops in Afghanistan as part
of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF),
most of them deployed around the capital Kabul. In the wake of
9/11, France offered its military resources and capabilities to
support the US-led military campaign, Operation Enduring Freedom.
French fighter aircraft regularly offer close air support
to ISAF ground troops.
France participates in the operational training of the Afghan
National Army. In eastern Afghanistan, France deployed four teams
of special French Military instructors (Operational Mentoring
Liaison Teams, OMLT), each consisting of 50 soldiers inserted
into units of the Afghan army. France has also sent more combat
aircraft to Kandahar in southern Afghanistan. Last month, two
multi-purpose Rafale fighter jets returned to Kandahar Air Base
to support ISAF troops against insurgents.
At the NATO defence ministers meeting, French Defence
Minister Hervé Morin confirmed that Paris is considering
a greater role in Afghanistan. He declined to give details but
suggested that President Sarkozy could announce a change in French
policy at an April NATO summit in Bucharest, Romania.
NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer met for the first
time in Paris with Sarkozy on February 1. Scheffer told a press
conference: I cant say that [Sarkozy] gave me definite
assurances, but the impression I had after the talks...and the
indications I received suggest that France might well take on
more responsibilities in Afghanistan, but of course its
the French governments decision.
France is taking over the rotating presidency of the European
Union in July. The US has urged France to use its presidency to
boost Europes defences by increasing military spending and
investment in hardware and troop levels, so that the USs
EU allies can play a greater military role in the occupation of
Afghanistan and Iraq.
French imperialism has considerable interests in Southwest
Asia. Its energy firms play a major role in regional pipeline
politics, and its corporations are pursuing lucrative defence
and infrastructure contracts. While it is to a certain extent
in competition with the US, a US defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan
would unleash social forces that would threaten its own interests
in the area.
Since his election in May, Sarkozy has taken a more pro-American
stance on a range of international issues. He has pledged his
support to the US-led occupation both in Afghanistan and Iraq
and the war on terror. He has adopted the tough US
line against Irans nuclear programme. During his visit to
the US last November, Sarkozy pledged that France will remain
engaged in Afghanistan for as long as it takes, because what is
at stake in that country is the very future of our values and
that of the Atlantic alliance.
In a September 2007 interview with the New York Times,
Sarkozy said that France was ready to rejoin NATOs military
command structurefrom which it had been absent since President
Charles de Gaulles 1966 decision to leave NATO, as part
of his plan for France to adopt an independent defence policy.
Sarkozys decision was warmly welcomed by the US.
Sarkozy has lined up behind the Bush administrations
claim that Iran represents a nuclear menace that must be countered
by tougher sanctions and the possible use of military force. Bernard
Kouchner, the French foreign minister, came out last fall in favour
of a military attack on Iran if negotiations fail.
Early this year, France announced the establishment its first-ever
permanent military base close to Irans coastline, which
will be set up by 2009 in the Persian Gulf region. The French
military has just conducted a two-week joint military exerciseGulf
Shield 01along with United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Qatar
troops. The exercises took place on UAE territory and in international
waters near the Strait of Hormuz, through which more than a third
of global oil shipments pass. The exercises involved 1,500 French,
2,500 UAE, and 1,300 Qatari troops operating on land, at sea,
and in the air. Around half a dozen warships, 40 aircraft, and
dozens of armoured vehicles were involved.
The base will give France its first permanent presence in this
region and is a further provocative action against Tehran. Iran
criticised the establishment of a French base as an unfriendly
move. We believe such a presence is not conducive to peace
and security in the region, said Mohammad Ali Hosseini,
the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman.
See Also:
France obtains energy deals,
establishes first military base in Persian Gulf
[24 January 2008]
French President Sarkozy visits
Afghanistan
[2 January 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |