|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Germany
German state of Hesse abolishes student fees
By Anna Rombach and and Helmut Arens
24 June 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On June 17 the state parliament of Hesse decided to abolish
student feesa measure which had been introduced one and
a half years ago. Certainly many students will be pleased with
the decision, which enables them to study free of charge. At the
same time, any jubilation on their part may well be short-lived.
Students should place no trust in any of the parties represented
in the Hesse state parliament in Wiesbaden.
None of these parties has a principled position for the defence
of the interests of students and the working population as a whole,
despite the new law to ensure equal opportunity at Hessen
universities passed by the state parliament majority, consisting
of the Social Democratic Party, the Greens and the Left Party.
The state parliament had already passed a motion reversing
the introduction of student fees on June 3. The state SPD and
Greens, with the support of the Left Party, passed the motion
with a slim one-vote majority. The original law to enforce study
fees of 500 euro per term had been introduced by the former state
governmenta coalition of the Christian Democratic Union
and the free market Free Democratic Partyin 2006, in the
face of fierce opposition by students.
However, the June 3 draft law to reverse student fees was incorrectly
formulated and the states acting Prime Minister Roland Koch
(CDU) refused to sign the measure two days later because of this
formal error. Koch accused the SPD and Greens of incompetence
on the basis of their inability to formulate a law correctly.
Koch received backing on June 11 from the Hesse High Court,
which declared in support of student fees even though the constitution
of the state guarantees education free of charge. In a move that
was clearly politically inspired, the court threw out an appeal
signed by 70,000 inhabitants of the state. The decision means
that student fees could be reintroduced at any time.
Finances to cover the costs of abolishing fees are ensured
in the state budget only to the end of 2008. Since none of the
parties is prepared to increase taxes on big business, it is clear
that the working population will have to make up the costs for
the new measure while universities will also suffer from declining
state financing.
Restructuring the universities
The Hesse SPD chairmen and leader of the state opposition,
Andrea Ypsilanti, declared that the abolition of student fees
meant that socially deprived layers would no longer be denied
access to the states universities. For the Left Party, Janine
Wissler declared that the measure could be a signal for the abolition
of student fees in other German states. In fact, nothing could
be further from reality.
The comprehensive restructuring of the universities is in full
swing. Across Europe public educational facilities are being converted
into privately owned and funded service enterprises. Privileged
elite universities, so called educational beacons
are being created while state run universities are being transformed
into quasi-private sponsored institutions such as the Goethe University
in Frankfurt, dependent on funding from private and business sources.
This process was set into motion by the former federal government,
the SPD-Green Party coalition led by Gerhard Schröder. It
is supported by all of the parties involved in the current grand
coalition government and the European Union.
Education is being transformed into a commodity with research
and education adapted to the needs of the German and European
business community. The ruling elites are exerting enormous pressure
on the universities to breed an academic elite that can serve
to advance competitiveness on the global market.
The universal introduction of student fees is one glaring expression
of this development, but it is not the only one. Waves of spending
cutsleading to the mass processing of students at state
universities forced to race through their standardized bachelor
training coursesincreasingly makes independent, critical
study a thing of the past.
In order to ensure free, high-quality education with equal
opportunities for all up to university level, it is necessary
to liberate the education system from the grasp of business interests
and structure education in the interests of the working populationa
perspective which is vehemently opposed by the SPD, the Greens
and the Left party.
The crisis of the SPD
There is no doubt that Roland Koch is a cynical representative
of the extreme right of the German political establishment. His
behaviour in the state parliamentincluding insults directed
at his political opponentsmakes a mockery of the most elementary
democratic principles. He is only able to succeed, however, because
of the role played by the SPD.
Andrea Ypsilanti was able to achieve a narrow majority in the
state parliament on the basis of a broad movement to the left
in the state electorate. In the state election campaign earlier
this year, voters clearly rejected the racist campaign against
young foreigners launched by Koch. They also expressed their discontent
with the anti-social policies of his coalition. In the course
of the election campaign, the SPD was able to wipe out a twenty
percent deficit in the polls and rival the CDU in the vote. The
Left Party obtained 5.1 percent.
However, instead of utilising this electoral base, Ypsilanti
declined to stand as candidate for the post of Prime Minister,
allowing Roland Koch to remain in office as acting Prime Minister
despite his drubbing at the polls on January 27.
Ypsilantis decision came on the heels of a vicious and
reactionary campaign by political and media circles, which had
the full support of the right wing in the SPD, directed against
co-operation between the SPD with the Left Party. Leading national
SPD politicians, such as Wolfgang Clement and Klaus von Dohnanyi,
conducted public polemics against Ypsilanti, while the right wing
in the Hessen SPD organised in the Networker group
of the Seeheim Circle campaigned behind her back.
SPD state deputy Dagmar Metzger, who refused to support Ypsilanti
because she feared the latter would cooperate with the Left Party,
was merely a pawn in the manoeuvres of these rightwing in the
SPD.
Ypsilantis most prominent rival inside the SPD, parliamentary
group deputy Jürgen Walter, recently called for a coalition
with the CDU with our eyes open.
Andrea Ypsilanti does not embody any sort of left or progressive
tendency in the SPD. Her politics are based on the attempt to
direct broad public discontent and the desire for change into
the channels of official bourgeois politics. In order to restore
some credibility in the SPD, Ypsilanti ran an election campaign
based on criticising some aspects of the anti-welfare Hartz IV
and Agenda 2010 programs, which had been originally introduced
by the SPD-Green federal coalition. At the same time she sought
to undermine support for the Left Party and prevent it from entering
the state parliament.
The promise by the SPD to abolish student fees has to be seen
in this light. It is a tactical manoeuvre aimed at heading off
the broad discontent with education politics that has resulted
in a wave of unrest in universities across the state.
At the same time, Ypsilanti has made no appeal to the students
and workers who supported her in the election against Koch. She
is utterly opposed to any popular mobilisation against the consequences
of policies that her own party introduced. All that is left is
the war of words between Kochs transitional government and
the majority in the state parliament. This effectively disenfranchises
the population as a political factor.
In fact the only one to profit from the situation is Roland
Koch. According to opinion polls, fresh elections would result
in a majority for the CDU and FDP.
Stalemate in the state parliament
Koch is hoping to play for time and delay new elections until
next summer to coincide with planned European elections. In the
meantime his acting government is repeatedly refusing to enact
resolutions passed by the majority in the state parliament.
In April the Hesse Interior Minister Volker Bouffier (CDU),
a close confidante of Koch, refused to enact a halt to the deportation
of refugees from Afghanistan, a measure that had been passed by
the state parliament. On the homepage of the state CDU, two party
representatives Peter Beuth and Holger Bellino, argue that such
deportations are politically necessary, because young Afghan men
have a responsibility to help re-construct their countryin
particular because the Hessen police is also active in such reconstruction.
The SPD spokesman for domestic affairs, Günter Rudolph,
called Bouffiers refusal an inappropriate party-political
test of strength, while the head of the Left Party
in the state parliament, van Ooyen, declared that Bouffiers
decision represented an affront to the entire state parliament.
However, the CDU is able to justify its stand by pointing out
that there is no ban on deportations in other German states where
the SPD is in power.
Progressive asylum politics have no support in the SPD, and
so at the start of the legislative period the Hessen SPD made
a retreat and dropped the issue.
Another explosive issue is the refusal by Koch and Bouffier
to rejoin the local employers state contract community (TDL)
despite a vote in favour by the state parliament in May. The state
government refuses to enact the resolution arguing it would allegedly
cost hundreds of millions of euros. Predictably Andrea Ypsilanti
grumbled over what she called an enormous snub for parliament
and all those employed in Hessen and a political scandal.
The same issue is due to come up again as part of budget consultations
at the end of 2008 and beginning of 2009. It is another potential
factor that could precipitate the dissolution of the state parliament
and new elections.
The role of the Left Party in the Hesse state
parliament
The Left Party in Hesse openly took up the issue of the TDL
agreement to declare its solidarity with the SPD and the Greens.
Together with both parties it sought an appropriate means of ensuring
that Koch could not repeatedly snub the state parliament.
At the same time it deliberately remains silent on the role
of its sister organisation in Berlin. As part of a state coalition
with the SPD in the German capital, the Left Party supported the
withdrawal of Berlin from the local employers TDL. The Senate
in Berlin deliberately took this step in order to be able to implement
drastic savings in the citys public services.
In the short period of time in which it has sat in the Hessen
state parliament, the Left Party has made no secret of its political
orientation to the SPD and Greens. It has dropped any independent
profile in favour of the role of loyal junior partner to the SPD.
The Left Party is not an alternative, but rather pursues the
goal of resurrecting reformist illusions in the SPD. The desolate
condition of the SPD is a direct expression of the fact that it
is no longer possible, in times of globalisation and international
financial and economic crises, to reconcile a policy of reformist
concessions to the working population with the defence of the
capitalist order.
The objective unity of the international working class is the
basis for an independent, international party of the working class,
which must break with the reformist politics of the SPD and the
Left Party. The Socialist Equality Party, as part of the International
Committee of the Fourth International, fought for this perspective
when it stood for elections in Hesse in January.
See Also:
Germany: a political balance sheet of
the Berlin transport strike
[17 June 2008]
Germany: Roland Koch remains
prime minister in Hesse
How the SPD right wing overturned an unwanted election result
[13 March 2008]
Hesse after the election:
Germanys Left Party wooes the SPD
[15 February 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |