|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: France
France: Unions, employers sign labour reform gutting workers
rights
By Francis Dubois and Alex Lantier
25 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On January 21, trade unions and employers organisations
signed an agreement for a drastic reform of French labour law.
The general thrust of the law is to increase trial periods for
new hires, make employment more directly contingent on market
conditions and the economic climate, and force fired workers to
accept any jobs offered to them. The agreement, passed behind
the backs of the workers, is a further betrayal of the workers
by the trade union bureaucracy.
With the agreement signed, the government of President Nicolas
Sarkozy and Prime Minister François Fillon is now free
to present it to the National Assembly for passage. Inside the
National Assembly, their conservative UMP (Union for a Popular
Majority) has a comfortable majority, guaranteeing passage of
the law.
The agreement substantially lengthens trial periods for new
hires in CDI positions (Indeterminate-Length Contracts, the principal
non-temporary job contract in France). It will increase from one
month to two months for workers and employees, to three months
for technicians, and to four months for professional workers.
Another provision allows for the renewal of the trial periodin
effect, doubling its length to four, six or eight months.
The more substantial change in this direction, however, is
the creation of a new type of CDD (Fixed-Length Contracti.e.,
temporary job contract)the Mission CDD, a nonrenewable
contract structured around a mission with a precise
goal, lasting 18 to 36 months. A worker in such a contract
would only have rights to 10 percent of his or her total pay as
a severance package if his employer decided to fire the worker
before the set date.
Maryvonne Labeille, CEO of the recruiting firm Labeille Conseil,
confirmed that the goal is to create a layer of workers whose
employment is completely dependent on the vagaries of the capitalist
market: The Mission CDD will above all allow [firms] to
absorb temporary economic growth. However, she also noted
that these Mission CDDs will be used to test out a position
and a job candidate that might later be turned into a longer-term
position, thus avoiding the CDI restrictions altogether.
Another major change is the introduction of friendly
ruptures of job contracts, making it substantially easier
to hire and fire workers. The friendly rupture is
a third way to terminate a job contract, besides resignation by
the employee or a formal firing (licenciement), for which
the employer must provide legal justification and which entitles
the fired worker to severance pay and a hearing before the conseil
des prudhommes (labour law courts). The friendly
rupture would allow employers seeking to fire employees
to dispense with such hearings, allowing employers to negotiate
severance pay directly with the worker instead of in the labour
courts.
Other measures include allowing employers to avoid paying indemnity
fees to workers discharged due to illness (the charges would be
paid by Social Security institutions) and making severance payments
to workers dependent on workers active search for
work and accepting valid job offers.
The passage of the accord testifies to the close political
collaboration that has evolved between Sarkozys government
and the trade union bureaucracy. Negotiations started on the accord
on September 7, 2007, after Fillon sent letters inviting the trade
unions to negotiations with employers federations. These
negotiations were kept secret and went unreported in the press
during the October-November railway and public sector strikes
against the cuts in the régime spéciaux pension
plans. Plans for a major reform in French labour law were announced
only during Christmas vacation.
The accord was signed at the headquarters of the Medef (Movement
of French Enterprisesthe main employers organisation)
by employers organisations as well as four of the five official
trade unions in France: the French Democratic Labour Federation
(CFDT), Workers Power (FO), French Christian Workers Federation
(CFTC), and the General Federation of Professional Workers (CGC).
The Stalinist-dominated General Confederation of Labour (CGT),
though it participated in all four months of negotiations over
the agreement, decided not to sign at the last minute after it
was clear that FO, the CFTC, and the CGC would all sign the agreement,
providing the minimum number of trade unions required for the
agreement to be presented to the National Assembly.
Employers organisations hailed the measure, with Medef
President Laurence Parisot declaring it a major social innovation.
The bourgeois press widely commented that it represented a French
version of flexisecuritythe combination of minimal
state protection and highly precarious employment that is the
basic model of labour law in the Scandinavian countries.
The introduction of flexisecurity has been advocated for some
time by the European Commission, various governments and a section
of the European bourgeoisie as the best way to reduce the living
standards of the working class and maintain European firms
competitiveness in the global economy without provoking a social
explosion. In this model, the trade unions play a major role,
as the main instrument whereby the legal attacks on living standards
are ratified and imposed on the workforce.
However, it is clear that this reform is only one step in a
more extensive plan of attacks being prepared on the living standards
of the working class. The trade unions reportedly convinced the
employers federations to put off the announcement of measures
reducing severance packages, which will doubtless be reintroduced
later. This month has also seen the publication of the decree
cutting the régime spéciaux pensions, and
further cuts in the general pension scheme will be negotiated
between employers federations, the government, and the trade
unions after the March 2008 municipal elections.
Many business figures criticised the present agreement as not
going nearly far enough. Jean-René Boidron, head of the
pro-business lobbying group Croissance Plus, told the conservative
daily Le Figaro, Its a symbolic victory because
of the idea of flexibility that it introduces, but it will not
revolutionise the situation. For all the hype presented
to the public about increasing employment by passing these laws,
Boidron judged that their impact would be minimal.
The labour law agreement not only represents a significant
attack on workers, but provides an important political lesson
in the limitations and ineffectiveness of militant protest aimed
at pressuring the state. The populations basic opposition
to flexisecurity underlay the multimillion-strong 2006 strike
and protest movement against the First Job Contract (CPE), which
aimed to introduce into French labour law conditions very similar
to those in the current agreement: lengthening trial periods and
facilitating hiring and firing.
This movement was brought to an end, however, by the shelving
of the law due to the concerted opposition of the trade unions
and then-interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy, who sought to defeat
his political rivals, then-president Jacques Chirac and then-prime
minister Dominique de Villepin. The trade unions and Sarkozy,
having defeated the CPE, are now plotting substantially greater
attacks on the living standards and working conditions of the
French masses.
See Also:
The wages of betrayal: France: Top union
pension negotiator gets lucrative promotion
[10 January 2008]
Report documents growth of social inequality
in France
[4 January 2008]
France: social cuts announced over Christmas
holidays
[3 January 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |