|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Middle
East
Bush uses Abu Dhabi speech to escalate threats against Iran
By Joe Kay
14 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
US President George Bush has used his trip through the Middle
East to escalate his warmongering threats against Iran. Speaking
at numerous stops in a region of the world where he is widely
and deeply hated, Bush has mouthed democratic platitudes while
seeking to build support among the Arab bourgeois regimes for
a wider military conflagration.
From his first stop in Jerusalem, Bush has sought to counter
any notion that his administrations bellicose policy toward
Iran has been altered by the US National Intelligence Estimate
(NIE) released in November. The NIE stated that by 2003 Iran had
halted any program to develop nuclear weapons, while concluding
that such a program had previously been underway. The report was
widely interpreted as a rebuke to the administrations claims
that Iran represented a nuclear menace that had to be countered
by more punishing sanctions and the possible use of military force.
However, Bushs repeated statements in the course of his
eight-day Middle East tour make clear that some form of military
actioneither by the US or Israelremains a very real
possibility.
On Sunday, Bush gave what the White House billed as a major
foreign policy address in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United
Arab Emirates. Recycling his standard accusations, he declared
that a prime cause of instability in the Middle East is
the extremists supported and embodied by the regime that sits
in Tehran. Iran is today the worlds leading state sponsor
of terror.
Bush accused Iran of promoting terrorism in Lebanon (by virtue
of its support for the popular anti-Israeli Shiite movement Hezbollah)
and the Palestinian territories (in the form of support for Hamas,
which two years ago won a popular election in the Palestinian
Authority). Without providing any evidence, he repeated the assertion
that Iran sends arms to the Taliban in Afghanistan and Shia
militias in Iraq. Finally, he insisted, that Iran defies
the United Nations and destabilizes the region by refusing to
be open and transparent about its nuclear programs and ambitions.
Underscoring the main purpose of his trip, Bush declared: Irans
actions threaten the security of nations everywhere. So the United
States is strengthening our longstanding security commitments
with our friends in the Gulfand rallying friends around
the world to confront this danger before it is too late.
The Middle East tour was preceded by a confrontation between
US war ships and Iranian speedboats in the Strait of Hormuzan
incident that the US has exploited to heighten tensions and ratchet
up its threats against Iran. Washington has portrayed the incident
as an Iranian provocation and a US naval officer has said he was
on the verge of giving the order to fire on the Iranian boats
when they turned away.
Iran has denied the charges and called the incident an unexceptional
encounter, one of many that occur in the narrow waters off the
Iranian coast that are patrolled by US war ships. On Sunday, the
Navy Times reported that the voice heard at the end of
a recording released by the US, warning that the American ships
would soon explode, may have had no connection to the Iranian
boats. Instead, it may have come from a locally famous heckler
known to intervene in radio transmissions between ships in the
area.
US rhetoric over the Strait of Hormuz incident was escalated
over the weekend. Bushs press secretary, Dana Perino, reported
a discussion between Bush and US Vice Admiral Kevin Cosgriff,
commander of the US Navys operations in the Gulf, in which
Cosgriff told Bush that he took the incident deadly seriously.
The Navy also acknowledged that in a separate incident in December,
US warships fired warning shots at an Iranian boat. This is the
first official confirmation of shots being fired in the Gulf.
There have been many signs in recent months that the Bush administration
and the US military are deliberately seeking to provoke the Iranians
into an action that could be seized on as a pretext for intensified
diplomatic hostilities and possible military attack.
Bush is able to count on the complicity of the Democratic Congress
in conducting his warmongering policy against Iran. Democrats
in the Senate helped pass a resolution last September, urging
the Bush administration to declare the Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps of Iran a terrorist organization. The two leading presidential
candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, have repeatedly
made bellicose anti-Iranian statements, declaring their willingness
to use the military against Iran.
On the same day as Bushs speech in Abu Dhabi, the United
Nations International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicated that
Iran was cooperating with its inspectors, contradicting Bushs
claims. A spokeswoman for the head of the IAEA, Mohammad El Baradei,
said that Iran had agreed to answer all remaining questions over
the next four weeks concerning the countrys alleged past
nuclear activities.
According to a report in the Associated Press, Shortly
before El Baradeis trip [to Iran over the weekend], diplomats
told the AP that Tehran had ended years of stonewalling and begun
providing some information on topics including whether it ever
had a military nuclear program and the state of its enrichment
technology.
El Baradeis efforts to diffuse US threats of war reflect
concerns among some European powers over a possible US or Israeli
military strike, an act that would further destabilize the entire
Middle East. These concerns have had no effect on the policy of
the Bush administration, however, which continues to press for
harsher UN sanctions. The US is demanding that Iran completely
halt all nuclear fuel processing as a precondition for negotiations.
Bushs comments on Iran came in a speech laden with contradictions
and absurdities. The US president, whose government is conducting
a war and neo-colonial occupation that has caused the deaths of
hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, announced the beginning of a
new era that offers hope for millions across
the Middle East who yearn for a future of peace and progress and
opportunity.
For decades, Bush declared, the people of
this region saw their desire for liberty and justice denied at
home and dismissed abroad in the name of stability. Today your
aspirations are threatened by violent extremists who murder the
innocent in pursuit of power.
Bush did not mention that the principle power working to frustrate
desires for liberty in the Middle East has been the United States,
which has supported and continues to support dictatorial and monarchical
regimes in order to secure the American corporate elites
domination over the vast oil resources of the region.
To the people of Iran, Bush promised that the day would come
when Iran joins the community of free nations. And when
that day comes, you will have no better friend than the United
States of America. The Iranian people could only interpret
these words as a threat that the same horrors wrought in Iraq
will be visited upon them if Iran does not accede to the demands
of American imperialism.
There was, of course, no attempt to square Bushs pose
as peacemaker and liberator with the intense and almost universal
hatred for him among the oppressed masses of the region. Popular
opposition to Bush was particularly evident in Ramallah, the capital
of the Palestinian Authority, which received the president on
January 10. The US has given strong support to PA President and
Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas as a counterweight to Hamas.
According to a report by the Agence-France Presse,
the region where Bush spoke was placed in a lockdown to keep
ordinary Palestinians away from the US president. Around
4,000 security officers sealed off the area around the Palestinian
Authority compound of Muqata to pedestrian traffic, with numerous
checkpoints set up to verify the identification of passers-by,
the AFP reported.
Residents in the area were closely monitored and told to stay
away from windows and rooftops. According to an Associated Press
report, US snipers were deployed throughout the area.
Bush was prevented from flying to Ramallah from Israel by heavy
fog. As a result, he had to travel to the Palestinian town as
part of a motorcade of dozens of cars that had to pass through
Israeli checkpoints. The AFP noted, Armed Israeli soldiers
lined the route from the King David Hotel to the Beit El checkpoint,
where military responsibility switched to Palestinian control
as the presidential limousine hurtled along the normally congested
streets.
Despite unprecedented security measures, some protests did
break out, but these were quickly crushed with tear gas and batons
by the police forces of the Palestinian Authority.
Bushs visit to Abu Dhabi followed a stop in Kuwait to
speak to General David Petraeus, the commander of US forces in
Iraq. Bush presented the US surge policy in Iraq as
a success, at the same time that the US military was engaged in
a massive escalation of violence in the environs of Baghdad.
Bush also indicated that the US might put on hold plans for
a limited withdrawal of the extra troops sent to Iraq last January.
He said that any decision on the drawdown of US forces would be
determined by Petraeus, whom he told, If you want to slow
her [the planned troop reduction] down, fine. Its up to
you.
Petraeus is due to report his recommendations on troop levels
to Congress in March or April.
See Also:
Bushs vision of a Palestinian state:
Subservient to Israel and policed by the major powers
[12 January 2008]
US carries out massive bombing on outskirts
of Baghdad
[12 January 2008]
Bush exploits Strait of Hormuz incident
to threaten Iran
[11 January 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |