|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East : Iraq
British-Iraqi survey confirms one million deaths as a result
of US invasion
By David Walsh
1 February 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Even as the Bush administration, virtually unchallenged by
the Democrats or any significant voices in the media, claims success
in Iraq and makes clear its intention to establish permanent bases
there, further polling data has emerged that underscores the dimension
of the US war crimes in that country.
The British polling agency ORB (Opinion Research Business)
issued survey results January 28 that confirm its earlier estimate
that more than one million Iraqi civilians have died as a result
of the American-led invasion and occupation. The British agency
carried out the work in association with its Iraqi research partner,
the Independent Institute for Administration and Civil Society
Studies (IIACSS).
In September 2007 ORB made public its finding that an estimated
1.2 million violent deaths had taken place in Iraq since March
2003. The agency commented at the time that US-occupied Iraq had
a murder rate that now exceeds the Rwanda genocide from
1994 (800,000 murdered), with another one million wounded
and millions more driven from their homes into exile, either internal
or foreign.
The American media, true to form, essentially took no notice
of the report, despite ORBs indisputable pedigreethe
firm has conducted polls for Britains Conservative Party
and the BBC. The Democratic Party presidential candidates also
ignored it. Neither the White House nor the Pentagon felt obliged
to comment on the research.
The ORB findings vindicated the study published in the Lancet,
the British medical journal, in October 2006, which put the Iraqi
death toll then at approximately 655,000.
As a co-author of the Lancet study, Les Roberts, wrote
in an email to MediaLens in response to the ORB surveys
publication in September, The poll is 14 months later with
deaths escalating over time. That alone accounts for most of the
difference [between the October 2006 Lancet paper and the
ORB poll]. Roberts noted that the Lancet and ORB
studies seem very much to align.
In its January 28 press release, ORB commented that further
survey work had confirmed its earlier estimate of more than
1 million Iraqi deaths as a result of the conflict which
started in 2003.
The agency referred to presumably critical or skeptical responses
to its earlier work, which was based on surveys undertaken primarily
in urban settings, and explained, We have conducted almost
600 additional interviews in rural communities. By and large the
results are in line with the urban results and we
now estimate that the death toll between March 2003 and August
2007 is likely to have been of the order of 1,033,000. If one
takes into account the margin of error associated with survey
data of this nature then the estimated range is between 946,000
and 1,120,000.
The results were culled from face-to-face interviews with a
representative sample of 2,414 Iraqi adults aged 18 and over (with
a margin of error of plus or minus 1.7 percent). Those surveyed
were asked: How many members of your household, if any,
have died as a result of the conflict in Iraq since 2003 (i.e.,
as a result of violence rather than a natural death such as old
age)? Please note that I mean those who were actually living under
your roof?
Among those answering the question, some 20.2 percent reported
at least one death in their household as a result of the US invasion
and occupation. Within those households, the average number of
deaths was 1.26 people. The last complete Iraq census in 1997
reported a total of 4,050,597 households. The polling firm thus
came up with the figure of approximately one million deaths since
March 2003.
The ORB-IIACSS team found that more than 40 percent of Baghdad
households had lost a family member, higher than in any other
area of Iraq. Among those willing to declare their doctrine (about
50 percent of the respondents preferred to describe themselves
simply as Muslims), Sunni households were more likely to have
known a victim or victims of the conflict (33 percent); the corresponding
figure among Shias was 16 percent.
The polling firm conducted 1,824 interviews in urban areas
and some 590 around rural sampling points. The survey methodology
utilized multi-stage random probability sampling and covers fifteen
of Iraqs eighteen governorates. Overall 112 unique sampling
points were covered92 in urban areas and 20 in rural locations.
For security reasons interviews were not conducted in Karbala
and Al Anbar provinces, and in Irbil the local Kurdish authorities
prevented the research team from conducting its work. The head
of IIACSS, Munqith Daghir, told Research magazine that
Kurdish security forces asked to accompany our interviewers
to the houses, just to be confident that we were not harming or
harassing people. Of course, this was just an excuse. I knew they
wanted to know what we were doing and they wanted to watch people,
to discover how they talked to us.
The updated survey found that 40 percent of the violent deaths
were attributable to gunshot wounds, 21 percent to car bombs,
8 percent to aerial bombardment, 4 percent to sectarian violence
and 4 percent to accidents.
The figure for deaths from aerial bombardment, some 80,000
or more, must refer to fatalities resulting from US or British
operations, since only their forces are equipped with airplanes
and helicopters.
As was the case in September, the American media has chosen
to ignore the ORB findings. The web sites of the New York Times,
Washington Post, Boston Globe and ABC News ran a brief
Reuters news story about the ORB findings. The Los Angeles
Times, Chicago Tribune, Detroit Free Press, Wall Street Journal,
CNN and CBS News have had no reference to the survey.
Neither Barack Obama nor Hillary Clinton has commented on the
death toll. On his web site, Obama makes mention of displaced
Iraqis, but has no reference whatsoever to civilian deaths.
In a speech Thursday in Las Vegas, George W. Bush unequivocally
defended the invasion of Iraq and brushed aside public opposition
to his policies. Bush asserted, The decision to remove Saddam
Hussein was the right decision. The world is better off without
Saddam Hussein in power. And so are the Iraqi people. There has
been some interesting progress in Iraq. They wrote a constitution.
They voted. Imagine a society going from a brutal tyrant to being
able to vote in a short period of time.
The president boasted that his decision to launch last years
surge in Iraq was based on the considered judgment
of military people and not upon any Gallup poll or
focus group. It was based upon what was right for the future of
the United States, and that is, as opposed to pulling troops out,
send more in.
Bush explained that he intended to go on flouting the popular
will: You know, a lot of folks say, well, whats next,
Mr. President? And my answer is, we have come too far in this
important theater in this war on terror not to make sure that
we succeed. And therefore any further troop reductions will be
based upon commanders and conditions. Iraq is important for our
security. I will be making decisions based upon success in Iraq.
The temptation, of course, is for people to say, well, make sure
you do the politically right thing. Thats not my nature.
Thats not exactly what were going to do.
The Iraqi people, and thousands of Americans, will continue
to suffer death and devastation until the international working
class intervenes and puts an end to the neo-colonial occupation
of Iraq.
See Also:
British polling agency:
More than one million Iraqi deaths since US invasion
[15 September 2007]
A deafening silence
on report of one million Iraqis killed under US occupation
[17 September 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |