|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Sri
Lanka
Sri Lankan president nervously assesses military stalemate
By K. Ratnayake
5 April 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Nearly three months after it formally abandoned the 2002 ceasefire,
the Sri Lankan governments hopes for a quick victory against
the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) are fading as military
operations in the North become bogged down.
Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse called a meeting of
the National Security Council (NSC) with military commanders from
the northern war fronts at his residence on March 28 to discuss
the situation. Four northern area commanders were present, along
with two key naval commanders.
Like every other aspect of the war, the NSC meeting was subject
to heavy censorship. Any hint that military operations are not
proceeding as planned has political ramifications for Rajapakses
shaky ruling coalition, which re-launched the communal war and
denounced any, even limited, criticisms as undermining the war
effort and tantamount to treason.
In that context, the Situation Report in last weekends
Sunday Times indicated an atmosphere of crisis at the NSC
meeting. Offensive operations in the North began in the Mannar
sector last July, after the LTTE was driven out of its eastern
strongholds, and in other northern sectors in January. Army commander
Lieutenant General Sarath Fonseka predicted he would defeat the
LTTE militarily by the end of 2008 when he planned to retire.
At the NSC meeting, however, none of the northern military
commanders could boast of impressive victories. The armys
ability to make rapid advances in the East depended in large measure
on a debilitating split in the LTTE ranks in 2004 that resulted
in the loss of thousands of fighters and their arms. Moreover,
the breakaway Karuna group acted as an auxiliary militia, collaborating
with the military in attacking LTTE positions. In the north, the
army is fighting on four fronts against entrenched LTTE positions
in a war of attrition in which casualties have been heavy on both
sides.
According to Sunday Times defence correspondent Athas
Iqbal, the NSC meeting decided that the weather was to blame.
Most of the military commanders, he wrote, were of the view
that an unexpected enemyincessant rainshad hampered
offensive operations in the Vanni. These were both in the Mannar
and Weli Oya sectors.... The bunkers were flooded. Air activity,
like surveillance, close air support, casualty evacuation, among
others, were being hampered by bad weather. Roads were muddy.
Deployment of armoured vehicles was posing a problem.
The military also accused the media of not being sufficiently
patriotic. A senior army officer had taken issue over Rupavahini,
the national television network not airing visuals they sent regularly
depicting successes in the battlefield, Iqbal wrote. Instead
footage of previous military activity was being broadcast.
An angry president immediately summoned Rupavahini officials to
the meeting to explain.
Iqbal cautiously noted that, having launched the war, the president,
who is also commander-in-chief and defence minister, would
naturally want to ascertain the progress made in the light of
heavy expenditure incurred on defence. Some aspects relating to
this cannot be commented upon due to personal constraints. They
include the all-important subject of casualties. Iqbal,
a conservative commentator with connections to the military hierarchy,
came under intense fire from the government last year for exposing
a scandal involving defence procurements.
Other commentators also point to the military standoff in the
North. Writing about the same NSC meeting, the state-owned Sunday
Observer declared that Rajapakse was concerned over
when the troops were able to get the Madhu area ... The President
was also worried about the increase of casualties among the troops.
Operations in the Mannar areas have been proceeding for more
than eight months without significant progress. Fighting is currently
taking place near the Madhu Church, leading to accusations and
counter-accusations by the military and LTTE that the other is
desecrating the area. Priests have moved out of the church, along
with a statue regarded by Catholics as sacred.
The Island reported on Monday that the army was also
confronting stiff resistance from the LTTE in the Weli Oya sector.
The newspaper quoted military spokesman Brigadier Nanayakkara
as saying that although the army had inflicted sizeable
damages on the defenders, the LTTE is determinedly resisting troops
operating on the Weli Oya front.
The navy suffered a setback on March 22 when the LTTE sunk
a Dvora Fast Attack Craft, resulting in the deaths of at least
10 sailors. Speculation continues as to the means used by the
LTTEwhether it was a suicide attack or a mine. The sinking
took place in deep waters off the LTTE base at Mullaithivu. The
attack raises concerns in Colombo that the LTTE may be able to
disrupt supplies to military forces based on the northern Jaffna
peninsula. The LTTE currently controls all land routes to Jaffna.
A recent request for more supplies from Pakistan on an emergency
basis is another sign of the strains on the military. According
to the India Asia News Service (IANS), Army Commander Fonseka
asked for 150,000 60mm mortar rounds as well as hand grenades
for immediate delivery. Other requests included 81 mm, 121 mm
and 130 mm mortar ammunition worth $US25 million. Last year, the
military bought $50 million worth of ammunition from Pakistan.
Ordering large quantities of replacement ammunition indicates
preparation for new offensives. The Sri Lankan army has relied
heavily on indiscriminate artillery and mortar barrages, as well
as aerial bombardment, not only to attack LTTE positions, but
to terrorise the local population. Hundreds of thousands of people
have fled their homes over the past two years.
Early last month, General Fonseka met with the Indian defence
officials and requested additional military equipment. India has
been providing military training, shared intelligence and non-offensive
equipment to the Sri Lankan forces. Concerned about the reaction
among Tamils in southern India, New Delhi has been reluctant to
openly support the war and appears to have denied Fonsekas
latest appeal.
Prime Minister Ratnasiri Wickramanayake made a four-day visit
last month to Israel, another of Sri Lankas arms suppliers.
The delegation included Ranjit Wickremasinghe, chief executive
officer of the Lanka Logistic Company and other top military officials.
The Lanka Logistic Company, which is controlled by the defence
ministry, is the sole purchaser of defence items for the military.
Wickramanayake met with Israeli Defence Minister Eduhard Barak
and visited the state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries and other
military suppliers. Sri Lanka has bought naval vessels, war planes
and guns from Israel since the 1980s but this is the first time
that a Sri Lankan prime minister has visited the country. Military
hardware and assistance was undoubtedly at the top of the agenda.
Janes Defence Weekly reported on March 14 that
the Sri Lankan government had concluded arrangements with Russia
to buy five MiG-29 fighter-bomber aircraft.
These large military purchases will place further strains on
government finances. Rajapakse has allocated 167 billion Sri Lankan
rupees ($US16 billion) for defence in the 2008 budgeta 20
percent increase over 2007. To cover the growing budget deficit,
the government has had to borrow domestically as well as on the
international money market at high interest rates.
The military spending and international price hikes for oil
and food pushed the countrys annualised inflation rate to
28 percent in March. Far from seeking a political solution to
the war, Rajapakse is driven to intensify military operations
in a bid to deflect mounting popular anger over deteriorating
living standards. Any military setbacks and high casualties would
only further fuel opposition, including in the governments
own ranks.
Rajapakses policies are a product of the communal politics
practiced by Sri Lankan ruling elite since independence in 1948.
Unable to solve any of the countrys social problems and
provide basic democratic rights, successive Colombo governments
resorted to whipping up to anti-Tamil communalism to divide the
working class.
The government of President J. R. Jayawardene provoked the
war in 1983 as a means of diverting attention from the devastating
impact of his free market politics. Despite more than 70,000 deaths,
none of his successors has been able to end the conflict, precisely
because they have been mired in the same reactionary outlook.
See Also:
Sri Lankan local polls: a travesty of
democracy
[2 April 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |