|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Brain injuries more prevalent among US troops than earlier
estimates
By Naomi Spencer
1 October 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The number of US troops who have sustained traumatic brain
injuries from bomb blasts in Iraq may be far higher than previously
estimated, new research suggests.
The political establishment has been well aware of the mounting
brain injury rate for years. However, the Pentagon has refused
to release figures on brain injuries, claiming that publishing
data on tests it has conducted would put soldiers at risk.
Bombs frequently cause concussions, or a bruising of the brain.
According to a September 23 article in USA Today, however,
research has found that the shock wave from an explosion can also
damage brain tissue in the middle of the brain, causing a change
in cellular metabolism and cell death. Unlike a concussion, the
cellular damage does not heal.
The USA Today article is based on research being carried
out by a team led by Johns Hopkins University scientist Ibolja
Cernak into the effect of blasts on animals. The researchers have
found that metabolic changes create a cascading effect
leading to the premature aging and death of surrounding tissue,
resulting in worsening brain damage over time.
Similar effects are being seen in humans as well. The symptoms
of this brain tissue death, including loss of memory functioning,
headaches, and dizziness, may not surface or be diagnosed for
years. In more severe cases, those with brain injuries suffer
seizures, numbness in the limbs, loss of coordination and vomiting.
Some soldiers must re-learn such basic skills as walking and talking.
Because troops are exposed to multiple bomb blasts, traumatic
brain injury is considered the signature wound of
the Iraq war in the same sense that Agent Orange exposure was
a major source of medical problems among Vietnam veterans.
Cernak told USA Today that the number of brain-injured
troops in Iraq may actually be far higher than reported because
soldiers may appear unhurt following a blast and be returned to
duty. These soldiers could have hidden injuries with long-term
consequences, she said.
Since October 2001, the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center
has diagnosed some 3,000 cases of traumatic brain injury. Some
neurologists within the Veterans Administration estimate the number
of undiagnosed cases to be more than 7,500. In 2005, doctors at
Walter Reed hospital screened every wounded soldier and found
60 percent had brain injuries. A similar screening at the National
Naval Medical Center found 83 percent of the arriving wounded
had brain damage.
Its the so-called invisible injury, Dr. Alisa
Gean, a neurosurgeon at the University of California, San Francisco,
told the Associated Press. Its where a troop takes
10 times the normal time to pack his rucksack ... a complicated
injury to the most complicated part of the body.
Advances in medical technology and the use of body armor have
made the US fatality rate in Iraq and Afghanistan substantially
lower than those of Vietnam, Korea, and World War II. Yet the
survival of so many seriously injured troops in Iraq has created
a higher proportion of severely disabled veterans than any other
war.
Since the 2003 invasion, more than 3,800 US troops have been
killed, and over 27,700 have been wounded in hostile circumstances.
The military has performed another 28,645 non-hostile related
medical air transports in Iraq, according to Defense Department
figures.
The war presents a staggering social burden in the form of
its human and financial costs. Based on 2006 records from the
Department of Veterans Affairs, the veteran advocacy group
Veterans for America estimated that current active duty soldiers
could file 400,000 disability claims in the coming years. Given
that this estimate was made before the addition of 30,000 troops,
that the political establishment has no plans to end the occupation
of Iraq, and that new war plans are being drawn up against Iran,
the number of disabled veterans will likely be much higher.
Soldiers returning with devastating physical and psychological
wounds are dependent upon military-administered medical care.
The VA facilities are overcrowded and understaffed, leading to
poor sanitation, neglect, complications due to infection, and
psychological withdrawal.
The parents of one soldier suffering from a traumatic brain
injury told the Boston Globe in an article published September
9 that they had no choice but to remove their son from the VAs
polytrauma center in Richmond, Virginia. The conditions
on the floor were horrible, the soldiers mother said.
It was dirty. Our son developed a bedsore from not being
moved enough and then it became infected.
I came one day and found my son sitting in his own feces,
she said. The nurses would not allow us to change him because
of the IV and the monitors. So he was made to just wait .... They
made him wait an hour and a half .... We knew we had to get him
out of there.
Yet private care is out of reach of most families. Many states
have no brain injury rehabilitation centers at all, and where
they are available, few provide any specialized care. For serious
cases of brain injury, rehabilitation costs more than $1,000 a
day. The recommended minimum rehabilitation period is 90 days,
and care over a lifetime for severe brain injury is estimated
at $17 million or more.
As concern for rising numbers of brain-injured veterans grows,
some politicians have sought to posture as advocates for wounded
soldiers. Congress authorized $150 million for brain injury research
as part of the war-spending bill passed in May.
This year, Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton
introduced a slew of bills bearing names such as Heroes
at Home Act, Restoring Disability Benefits for Injured
and Wounded Warriors Act, and Protecting Military
Family Financial Benefits Act.
These bills are largely symbolic, and unwittingly do more to
reveal the deplorable conditions wounded troops face than to alleviate
them. The reality is that when soldiers are wounded, they are
not guaranteed coverage for their care, they are neglected, and
their injuries are not acknowledged by the military.
The cynical posturing of Democratic politicians such as Clinton
comes as they continue to support the occupation of Iraq. In a
debate last week, Clinton and the other major Democratic Party
presidential candidates said they could not guarantee that US
troops would be out of Iraq by 2013. Responsibility for the deaths
and injuries of Iraqis and US soldiers lies with the entire political
establishment, which launched the Iraq war, and is now preparing
for war against Iran.
See Also:
US commission on wounded soldiers:
stopgap measures for a veterans healthcare system in "meltdown"
[28 July 2007]
Soldiers, families speak
at Walter Reed public hearing
Government indifference, cost-cutting compound ravages of war
for wounded US troops
[15 March 2007]
Walter Reed scandal lifts
lid on neglect of wounded US troops
[10 March 2007]
US soldiers in Iraq
suffer horrific brain and mental injuries
[20 November 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |