|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
US State Department offered immunity to Blackwater mercenaries
By Kate Randall
1 November 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
More than a month and a half after the September 16 massacre
carried out in Baghdad by guards from the Blackwater USA security
firm, it has come to light that the US State Department offered
limited immunity to the mercenaries involved in shooting
to death at least 17 Iraqi civilians.
The offer of immunity was granted to the Blackwater guards
by State Department officials in Baghdad in the immediate aftermath
of the shootings in exchange for giving sworn statements about
the incident. This immunity was granted without the knowledge
of the US Justice Department, and news of the deal apparently
caught State Department officials in Washington off guard.
Under the use immunity granted to the mercenaries,
any statements they makeand any evidence gathered as a result
of the statementscannot be used against them in any future
prosecutions. A scenario could develop where State Department
officials are privy to information they do not relay to prosecutors.
According to ABC News, each of the interviewed guards
statements begins with the following: I understand this
statement is being given in furtherance of an official administrative
inquiry, and that, I further understand that neither
my statements nor any information or evidence gained by reason
of my statement can be used against me in a criminal proceeding.
News of the immunity offer has outraged relatives of the shooting
victims, and has focused renewed attention on the operations of
Blackwater and the other security firms operating in Iraq. While
Blackwater CEO Erik Prince continues to maintain that the guards
fired in self-defense, mounting evidence demonstrates that the
massacre was unprovoked.
A preliminary investigation by the Iraqi government concluded
that the Blackwater guards did not come under attack, but opened
fire when a vehicle carrying a woman and a child moved slowly
into the traffic circle and toward their convoy. A US military
probe into the shootings also found that the shootings were unprovoked.
Iraqi officials are coming under pressure to hold the mercenaries
to account. Sami al-Askari, a senior adviser to Iraqi Prime Minister
Nouri al-Maliki, commented, Blackwater guards committed
an unjustified crime in cold blood intended to kill as many Iraqis
as possible. The American side says it needs much more time ...
but the prime minister wants them [Blackwater] to leave now. They
must leave.
On Tuesday, the Iraqi cabinet authorized and sent to parliament
for approval draft legislation lifting immunity for foreign private
security companies. The measure would end a provision known as
Order 17, established in 2004 under the Coalition
Provisional Authority, granting full immunity from prosecution
in Iraqi courts to foreign contractors, including private security
firms.
The measure, however, would not be retroactive and would not
apply to the security guards involved in the September 16 incident.
It is also highly unlikely that the State Department and Blackwater
would cooperate with any Iraqi prosecution in this or similar
cases of violence against Iraqi civilians.
The immunity deal is also complicating the current FBI investigation
into the shootings. Many of the dozen or so Blackwater guards
involved have declined FBI interviews into the incident. The FBI
probe is one of four currently under way. The Iraqi police, the
Pentagon and a joint panel of the US Embassy and the Iraqi government
have also undertaken inquiries.
Even without the immunity, it would be extremely difficult
to prosecute the Blackwater mercenaries in US courts. Upon completion,
the FBI will submit its evidence to Justice Department officials
who will decide whether or not to prosecute. Any such prosecution,
however, would face steep legal hurdles.
While the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act permits
prosecution of contractors working abroad in support of Defense
Department operations, it does not necessarily apply to contractors
working for the civilian-led State Department.
A panel commissioned by the Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice in the wake of the September 16 shootings concluded as well
that even if a private security guard committed cold-blooded murder,
there may be no legal basis for prosecuting the guard in the US
court system.
The panels report, drafted by Patrick Kennedy, the State
Departments director of management policy, concluded, The
panel is unaware of any basis for holding non-Department of Defense
contractors accountable under US law.
The panel also recommended a series of toothless requirements
governing security contractors, including having agents from the
Bureau of Diplomatic Security accompany security convoys, and
placing video recording, audio, and tracking equipment inside
the vehicles.
Their report also advised that the mercenaries undergo training
to increase their cultural awareness. According to
the State Departments own records, which likely underestimate
such violent incidents, since the beginning of the year Blackwater
guards have been deployed on 1,873 missions and have discharged
weapons in the course of 56 of these. Sensitivity training is
unlikely to alter this behavior.
In an interview with CNN, Blackwaters Prince commented,
In the ideal sense, we would be subject to the Iraqi law,
but that would mean ... there was a functioning Iraqi court system
where Westerners would actually get a fair trial ... Thats
not the case right now.
The Blackwater guards and other security contractors are an
integral component of the US occupation of Iraq. Blackwater USA
has government contracts totaling at least $800 million, providing
security to US Ambassador Ryan Crocker and other diplomats. While
every investigation undertaken to date has established that the
Blackwater guards fired with impunity and without provocation
in the September 16 incident, there have been no indications by
the State Department that the security firm will be held to account
for its actions.
Preliminary reports from the FBI probe into the incident corroborate
earlier findings. Three witnesses interviewed as part of this
investigation spoke to the Los Angeles Times after their
debriefings. They said that the investigators were seeking to
determine whether the security guards were fired upon first.
In interviews that lasted about two hours, the witnesses were
shown a large aerial image of Nisoor Square, the scene of the
massacre, and were asked to explain how they arrived at
the scene, what their vantage point was when the shooting occurred,
their detailed recollection of events, and what the shooters looked
like, according to the Times.
All three witnesses told the FBI that they did not see anyone
fire on the security guards. Hassan Jabbar Salman, a lawyer, said
he was about 20 yards from the guards and was shot four times.
They asked me whether they were exposed to fire, he
said. I replied to them that they were never exposed to
any kind of fire.
Another witness, Baraa Sadoon Ismail, 29, who still has two
bullets and 60 bullet fragments in his abdomen from the shooting,
told the FBI that he did not see anyone fire on the Blackwater
guards.
Mohammed Hafidh Abdul-Razzaq, 37, lost his 10-year-old son
Ali in the massacre. He was shot and killed as he sat in the back
seat of his car. He saw no one open fire on the guards. Speaking
to the Christian Science Monitor, Hafidh recalled the shooting
as a nightmare. I saw them shoot at people who were already
dead over and over again.
In his interview with the FBI, Abdul-Razzaq recounted how he
was trapped on all sides by stopped cars and was helpless as the
security guards pummeled his car with bullets. When the shooting
stopped, he ran to a nearby car to check on a shooting victim.
The LA Times described the horrifying scene as told
by Abdul-Razzaq: He said he had glimpsed his son earlier
through the rear-view mirror, slumped against the door in the
back seat, and assumed he must have fainted.
But when he opened the door, blood and brain tissue poured
from his sons head. He slammed the door shut in disbelief.
Then he jumped into the car, feeling his 10-year-old sons
chest to see whether his heart was still beating. The race to
the hospital was futile.
Witnesses Salman and Abdul-Razzaq both told the FBI investigators
that they saw people in cars shot as they tried to turn and drive
away, and even after they had jumped out of their cars and attempted
to flee on foot.
Abdul-Razzaqs sister, who was in the car with him that
day, was also interviewed by the FBI. He told the Times
that she told the investigators that it would be better
for them to bomb Iraq with an atomic bomb rather than kill one
or two people on a daily basis. Kill us all in a matter
of seconds so that we may be free of this torment,
she said.
A total of seven victims families have been offered cash
payments for their losses, which the US Embassy claims is not
an admission of guilt. Mohammed Hafidh refused to accept an envelope
filled with $12,500 in cash offered to him on October 24 by the
US Embassy as compensation for his sons death. Rejecting
the offer by Patricia Butenis, deputy chief of mission at the
embassy, he commented, I told her that I want the courts
to have their say, according to the Monitor.
Haythem al-Rubaie, 37, lost his wife and son in the September
16 shooting. His son Ahmed was most likely the first to be killed
as the car he was driving entered the roundabout in Nisoor Square.
He was driving his mother Mahesen, a dermatologist, for errands
in western Baghdad after dropping off his father. Rubaie refused
to even meet with the embassy officials.
See Also:
US government unable to account
for $1.2 billion paid to Iraq contractor
[24 October 2007]
Iraqi probe finds Blackwater
mercenaries fired without provocation in Baghdad massacre
[8 October 2007]
Blackwater mercenaries
record of murder in Iraq
[1 October 2007]
US forces kill Iraqi civilians
every day
[17 July 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |