|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Afghanistan
US massacres of civilians spark protests in Afghanistan
By Joe Kay
5 May 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Bombing raids by US-led NATO forces in western Afghanistan
last week killed at least 50 civilians and perhaps over 100, reports
from Afghan government officials and human rights organizations
have confirmed.
The aerial bombings took place on April 28 and 29 in the Shindand
District of the western province of Herat. According to a statement
by the US military, 136 Taliban fighters were killed
in two separate bombing raids, but this claim provoked immediate
anger and skepticism on the part of local residents, who insist
that there are no Taliban in the region. Earlier this week, thousands
gathered to protest the killings and denounce the US-backed government
of Hamid Karzai. At least 20 were wounded when Afghan police opened
fire on the demonstrators.
In recent days, reports have emerged from the province itself
about the nature of the bombings. Ghalum Nabi Hakak, the Herat
representative of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission,
told the Washington Post on Wednesday night, So far
the people have buried 45 bodies, and they are still taking out
more. Yesterday they buried 12 children, he said. The
exact number of dead is not clear, but the people are very angry.
Those who visited the area said that by mid-week villagers
were still attempting to dig out bodies from collapsed mud houses
destroyed in the NATO raids on two villages.
Reports differ on the number of people killed and displaced
by the bombings. One resident said that more than 100 people had
been killed, and all were civilians. Many more were injured. Adrian
Edwards, spokesman for the United Nations Assistance Mission in
Afghanistan, said a separate investigation found 49 civilians
killed and over 900 families displaced. Farzana Ahmadi, a spokeswoman
for the governor of Herat, said that 100 houses were destroyed
and 1,600 people rendered homeless.
Ahmadi said that a report prepared by local officials concluded
that some women and children were drowned in the river,
and it was maybe in the heat of the moment that the children and
people wanted to escape and jumped into the water.
While the exact nature of the events leading up to the bombings
is unclear, it is known that US special forces were in the area
conducting operations. The US military claims that these forces
met some resistance, but there is no independent confirmation
of these claims. NATO air support was called in, and the villages
were bombed.
In response to this latest massacre, NATO military and Bush
administration spokesmen repeated the same rationales given for
every atrocity. General Dan McNeill, commander of NATOs
International Security Assistance Forces, declared that only
firing insurgents were targeted.
White House spokesman Tony Snow tried to pin the blame for
the deaths on Afghans, saying on Thursday that the Taliban was
deliberately placing [civilians] in harms way.
The nature of US operations in the western region of Afghanistan,
which borders Iran, is unknown. Most military actions in the past
have concentrated on the south, near the border with Pakistan,
where the Taliban has the most support. Local residents insist
that there are no members of the Taliban in the area. It is possible
that the US is seeking to establish a firmer grip on western Afghanistan
in preparation for any planned operations against Iran.
The killings in western Afghanistan took place amid a broader
spring offensive by US and NATO forces that has led
to the deaths of scores of people throughout the country. On Friday,
Janan Gulzai, a provincial assembly member, said that at least
13 civilians were killed in a NATO bombing raid in southern Afghanistan
on Tuesday night. Gulzai told Reuters, I saw all the victims
are civilians.
These civilians were apparently killed in a similar manner
as those in Herat province. NATO warplanes were summoned after
ground forces came under fire. The planes bombed the area indiscriminately,
destroying three automobiles containing the 13 people killed.
An ongoing British-led NATO offensive in the south this week
has killed at least 75, all described by the NATO forces as Taliban.
These incidents follow two separate killing sprees by US forces
near the eastern city of Jalalabad. Six were killed during a raid
on April 29, including one woman and one child. In March, US marines
went on a rampage in the same area that left 12 civilians dead
and 35 more injured.
It is difficult to derive any objective measure of the toll
on the Afghan population from operations by US and NATO forces
in recent months. Media coverage of events outside of the capital
of Kabul is based largely on statements by US and NATO military
commanders. An AP account found that 151 civilians have been killed
this year, including 51 blamed on US and NATO forces (not including
the recent reports from Herat). However this tally is based on
figures provided by NATO and the Karzai government, and both have
an obvious interest in underreporting civilian casualties.
Mounting civilian casualties have, however, led to a sharp
increase in popular opposition to the occupation and the Karzai
government.
The most recent killings in Jalalabad have led to several days
of protests involving thousands of people, including many Afghan
students. The AFP quoted one student attending a protest on Wednesday
asking, Why are they [Karzai and Bush] not accounting for
the blood of innocent people who are being killed by the Americans
on our soil? Another declared, The Americans have
invaded our country. They have made themselves the owners and
us their slaves.
Opposition to the government is growing, and is not confined
to supporters of the Taliban. Demonstrations over the past week,
including protests by hundreds of people on Friday, have clearly
shaken the unstable puppet regime in Kabul, prompting Karzai to
issue statements denouncing the civilian deaths. One of the principal
demands of the protests has been for Karzais resignation.
Karzai insisted on Wednesday that his government can no
longer accept civilian causalities. The intention
may be very good to fight terrorism, sometimes mistakes are made,
but five years on, it is very difficult for us to continue to
accept civilian casualties, he said. Its not
understandable anymore. Karzai warned of serious consequences
for all if the violence against civilians is not curtailed.
Certainly he counts himself among those who might face these serious
consequences.
In comments to the AFP, veteran Afghan journalist and commentator
Ikhpolwak Safi noted, When civilians dieobviously
not for good reasonand it is linked to [Karzais] government,
it will turn people against him. Dropping bombs on villages because
one individual attacked them is not a wise thing to do. This is
what the foreign troops have been doing.
See Also:
NATO troops launch new offensives in
Afghanistan
[1 May 2007]
Reports confirm Canadas
complicity in Afghan state torture
[27 April 2007]
Australia dispatches more
troops for phoney war on terror in Afghanistan
[19 April 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |