|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
New Zealand threatens to cut aid to the Solomon Islands
By John Braddock
16 July 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters used a visit to
the Solomon Islands last week to threaten Prime Minister Manasseh
Sogavare with the withdrawal of aid unless his government ended
its attempts to rein in the activities of the Australian-led Regional
Assistance Mission (RAMSI) and acceded to demands over key appointments.
According to the New Zealand Herald on July 11, Peters
spent a tense hour talking to Sogavare about the contentious
issues in a meeting that coincided with the swearing in
of constitutional lawyer Julian Moti as attorney-general. Mohammed
Jahir Khan, a Fijian, had already been installed as police commissioner.
Both appointments have been opposed by Canberra. Australian police
officer Shane Castles was dumped as police commissioner after
he waged a vendetta against Moti.
The Australian government has been seeking Motis extradition
on child sex charges, dating back to 1997 in Vanuatu, where they
have already been dismissed. As far as Canberra is concerned,
Motis real crime is that he helped establish a Commission
of Inquiry into the causes of riots in Honiara in April 2006,
following national elections. The investigation threatens to expose
RAMSIs role in provoking the unrest to create the conditions
for the deployment of more Australian personnel.
In 2003, New Zealand supported the Australian-led armed intervention
into the Solomons as a means for realising its own predatory ambitions
in the Pacific. RAMSI was the legal-political umbrella under which
troops, police, administrators and private businesses from the
two regional powers virtually took over the key levers of the
Solomons state apparatus, and it is regarded as a model
for future interventions elsewhere.
RAMSI currently comprises about 250 police from 10 Pacific
nations35 from New Zealand as well as three in key managerial
and official posts. More than 6,300 peopleout of a population
of only 500,000have been arrested in the Solomons since
2003. Last year, Prime Minister Helen Clark declared that New
Zealands involvement would be for as long as it takes
and claimed the law-and-order situation had been transformed
out of sight.
Relations with Australia have become increasingly bitter amid
growing opposition in the Solomons to RAMSIs neo-colonial
operations. While not wanting a complete break in relations, Sogavare
is seeking to curb Canberras influence over his government.
A review of RAMSIs operations, set up by the Pacific Islands
Forum last year in response to Sogavares criticisms, is
due to report back this month.
Peterss comments last week underlined the real character
of the RAMSI intervention. He was by turns pedantic, patronising
and menacing. We have to put our cards on the table here
and get a clear declaration of understanding and support of RAMSI
by the Solomon Islands government and indeed every politician
in the Solomons, he told a press briefing.
Warning that aid came with conditions, Peters added: We
want to be a good neighbour in the Pacific but, whilst we dont
give aid in a tied fashion on a criteria (sic) requiring certain
responses from them, nevertheless aid we give has a certain series
of principles attached to it and good governance is a critical
one in the view of the New Zealand government.
Good governance is the code word used by Wellington
and Canberra to describe those regimes and policies that coincide
with their own economic and strategic agendas.
Hailing RAMSIs achievements, Peters declared there was
no doubt the Solomons would be in a critically adverse
situation if RAMSI were not there. New Zealand would be very
concerned, he said, if the situation deteriorated while
the Solomon Islands government ignored its friends
advice. To drive home the point, he added: If weve
got points of objection then lets hear it now.
Peters was particularly incensed at plans to end the current
monopoly of arms, and immunity from prosecution, enjoyed by RAMSI
police. Khan has announced he wants to re-arm local police and
has sought $US2.6 million from the budget for that purpose. Peters
said New Zealand would find it hard to stomach any
proposals to strip RAMSI personnel of protection.
I dont think that [Sogavares] under any illusion,
foreign countries couldnt accept that, he declared.
Peters further challenged the appointment of Moti and Khan,
saying Sogavare had previously said he wanted Solomon Islands
nationals in key positions. My point to him was youve
just got two paramount key appointments that are to do with any
good governance operation, chief of police and attorney-general,
and they are both foreigners, and how does that square with your
statements to me last year?
Responding to Sogavares claims that no suitable locals
were available, Peters declared: I have to tell you that
I was alarmed at that. The interpretation of those statements
would suggest there is some confusion as to the separation of
powers in that you had to have servants loyal to the government
to occupy those positions. Peters sought assurances that
RAMSI would not be affected by the appointments.
All of these comments reek of gross hypocrisy. The Australian
and New Zealand governments have ridden roughshod over the national
independence and constitution of the Solomons Islands. Peterss
concerns have nothing to do with the niceties of constitutional
law. Rather he is seeking to ensure that the top posts continue
to be held by servants loyal to Canberra and Wellington.
Moreover, Peterss own position as foreign minister is
politically, if not constitutionally, dubious. He is the leader
of a minority right-wing party, NZ First, in the ruling Labour-led
coalition in Wellington. Under his deal with Labour, Peters insisted
on the unprecedented arrangement whereby he remains a leading
minister, but outside cabinet, responsible to no one and free
to be as loyal or disloyal to the elected government as it suits
him.
Peters justified his threat to withdraw aid with the populist
pitch: [W]e have people who need to be at work at 5 oclock
in the morning to pay taxes to cover this recovery. Lets
understand our commitment to them back in New Zealand.
New Zealand politicians periodically boast that the Solomon
Islands is the countrys principal bilateral aid recipient.
The official NZAid contribution rose from $16.1 million in 2004/05
to $21.1 million by 2007/08. A substantial portion of this aid
is spent on the salaries of New Zealand personnel, rather than
providing badly needed social services. This annual figure was
less than the $34 million lump sum handed over to the wealthy
private yachting syndicate that unsuccessfully challenged for
the Americas Cup in Valencia last month.
Overall, New Zealands aid budget remains very small.
Proportionately New Zealand lags behind most other OECD nations,
spending just 0.27 percent of its gross national income (GNI)
on foreign aid.
In the end, Peters walked away from his meeting with Sogavare
with empty hands. He told the media that the meeting wasnt
the easiest and that his objective was to make sure
there was no doubt about where New Zealand stood ... Whilst we
were committed to being a good neighbour, that wasnt at
all (sic) cost. Behind the open threat of cutting aid, Wellington
and Canberra are undoubtedly considering other plans to undermine
the Sogavare government.
See Also:
Solomons Islands' government defies Canberra,
reappointing Julian Moti as attorney-general
[11 July 2007]
New Zealand widens sanctions on Fiji
following high commissioner's expulsion
[10 July 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |