|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East : Iraq
Saddam Hussein execution: A sectarian lynching
By Patrick Martin
3 January 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A video of the final minutes of Saddam Hussein, released to
the Arab media late Saturday and widely broadcast around the world,
demonstrates that the execution of the former Iraqi president
was an act of sectarian vengeance by the Shiite Muslim groups
placed in power by the US invasion of the country.
The video, apparently made using the cell phone of one of the
guards or official witnesses in the death chamber, records the
last fragments of conversation between Hussein and his hooded
executioners, who were apparently loyal to the Shiite radical
clergyman Moqtada al-Sadr, head of the most powerful militia force
in Iraq, the Mahdi Army.
Several of the executioners and witnesses began chanting the
name of the Shiite leader, Moqtada, Moqtada, Moqtada,
as the noose was slipped around Husseins neck. He responded
with surprise, and then a scornful retort, Moqtada? Is this
how real men behave?
Other onlookers chanted the name of Moqtada al-Sadrs
fathera co-founder of the Dawa Party, one of the backers
of Prime Minister Nouri al-Malikiand one shouted, Go
to hell, to which Hussein responded that those responsible
for his execution had erected a gallows of shame.
Even the judge who had ratified the death sentence, Munir Haddad,
reproached the sectarian outburst by the Shiite guards, telling
them, Please no! The man is about to die. The video
then concludes with grisly footage of the trapdoor opening and
Hussein plunging to his death, his neck broken and his body swinging.
Beyond the events recorded on the video, the very fact that
Mahdi Army loyalists were among the guards in the death chamber
and could record the proceedings without hindrance has enormous
political significance. It demonstrates the extent to which the
US-backed Iraqi regime has become the instrument of factions in
the sectarian conflict raging throughout much of Iraq.
For nearly a year, Sunni Muslims, Christians, secular Iraqis
and others targeted by Shiite death squads have been hunted down,
tortured and murdered. Most of these atrocities have begun with
the seizure of the victims by armed members of the Iraqi police
and militarythe very forces the Bush administration claims
it has been training to fight terrorism.
By Monday, with the digital recording circulating throughout
Iraq and the entire Arab and Muslim world, it was clear that for
the Maliki government and the US occupation regime the execution
had become a political debacle. Thousands of Sunnis marched in
protest demonstrations in Tikrit, Mosul and cities and towns throughout
Anbar province. In Samarra, where the bombing of the Shiite Golden
Mosque last February touched off the sectarian warfare, Sunnis
marched through the shattered structure with a coffin representing
Saddam Husseins.
The Maliki government, in a belated effort to distance itself
from the images of Shiite triumphalism, ordered an investigation
into how the video was shot in the death chamber and how it was
distributed. But at least one eyewitness, one of the prosecutors
in Husseins trial, said that the cell phone was brought
in by a top government official, whom he would not name, not by
a guard, and that the recording of the final altercation between
the guards and Hussein was done quite openly.
Detailed reports in the US media conceded that the execution
had backfired on the Bush administration. An account published
in the New York Times Monday observed that it would be
difficult for the White House to disassociate itself from the
rushed execution of the former president, since the hanging took
place at a US-controlled military facility in Baghdad, and Hussein
remained in US custody until he was handed over to the executioners.
The article, co-authored by John Burns, the Times bureau
chief in Baghdad and one of the most avid apologists for the war,
noted that Iraqs new Shiite rulers . . . seemed bent
on turning the execution and its aftermath into a new nightmare
for the Sunni minority privileged under Mr. Hussein.
The Times reported that US officials in Iraq were privately
incensed at the dead-of-night rush to the gallows, and had
repeatedly urged the Maliki government to delay the execution
by a few weeks in order to conform to provisions in the Iraqi
constitution and legal code, requiring approval of the hanging
by the three-member Iraqi presidency, and barring executions during
the celebration of Id al-Adha, a Muslim religious holiday.
The timing was perhaps the most brazenly sectarian aspect of
the execution, since Saturday is the first day of Id al-Adha,
according to the Sunni practice, while the holiday begins on Sunday
for Shiites. One official effectively declared the Shiite observance
to be the law of the land, and, as the Times revealed,
the Shiite clergy were given final decision-making power, not
the elected government.
The Times reported that the Maliki government had debated
objections from US officials and Sunni politicians over conducting
the execution on Saturday, then decided to refer the decision
to the marjaiyah, the council of ayatollahs in the Shiite holy
city of Najaf, which is the highest body of the Shiite clergy.
According to the Times, The ayatollahs approved.
Mr. Maliki, at a few minutes before midnight on Friday, then signed
a letter to the justice minister, to carry out the hanging
until death.
The Times concluded with the remarkable admission, None
of the Iraqi officials were able to explain why Mr. Maliki had
been unwilling to allow the execution to wait. Nor would any explain
why those who conducted it had allowed it to deteriorate into
a sectarian free-for-all that had the effect, on the video recordings,
of making Mr. Hussein, a mass murderer, appear dignified and restrained,
and his executioners, representing Shiites who were his principal
victims, seem like bullying street thugs.
A second article in Mondays Times reinforced this
picture by reporting the reaction among Sunni Arabs in Baghdad:
the grainy recording of the executions cruel theater
summed up what has become increasingly clear on the streets of
the capital: that the Shiite-led government that assumed power
in the American effort here is running the state under an undisguised
sectarian banner.
The Associated Press, in a report on the Sunni response to
the execution, noted that the hanging was followed by a US military
raid on the Baghdad offices of a prominent Sunni politician, in
which six Iraqis were killed, and warned, The current Sunni
protests, which appear to be building, could signal a spreading
militancy.
Rizgar Mohammed Amin, the Kurdish judge who presided over the
first trial of Saddam Hussein until he was forced to resign by
official pressure from the ruling Shiite bloc, condemned the timing
and manner of the execution. The hanging violated a clear legal
prohibition (enacted under Husseins rule and still in force)
stating that no verdict should be implemented during the
official holidays or religious festivals, Amin told Associated
Press.
The cell phone video of the execution of Hussein demonstrates
the reality of the democracy which the US invasion
has brought to Iraq. The invasion has destroyed the framework
of the Iraqi state, exacerbated social tensions, and provoked
an explosion of sectarian violence at the cost of hundreds of
thousands of lives. The continuing US occupationin which
American and British troops continue to kill thousands of Iraqis
even as murder squads operate on both sides of the Sunni/Shiite
dividehas brought about not the flowering of freedom,
but the virtual dissolution of Iraqi society.
See Also:
The execution of Saddam
Hussein
[30 December 2006]
A legal farce: Iraqi
court confirms Saddam Hussein's death sentence
[27 December 2006]
US Marines charged
in Haditha massacre of Iraqi civilians
[23 December 2006]
Year-end press conference:
Bush sets stage for major escalation in Iraq
[21 December 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |