|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
CIA destroyed torture tapes
By Joe Kay
8 December 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The revelation that the Central Intelligence Agency destroyed
at least two video tapes depicting the torture of prisoners held
by the United States underscores the brazen criminality of the
Bush administration. Aside from the torture itself, the elimination
of evidence of brutal interrogation exposes top CIA and government
officials to obstruction of justice charges.
In an article published on Friday, the New York Times cites
several unnamed current and former government officials in reporting
that at least two videotapes were destroyed. The tapes
showed the 2002 interrogation of two prisoners, one of whom was
Abu Zubaydah, considered a top member of Al Qaeda. The other individual
was not named.
Although the government has never officially acknowledged it,
Zubaydah, captured by the CIA in March 2002, was subjected to
water-boarding, a form of torture involving the near drowning
and suffocation of the prisoner. One can only assume that the
tapes depict water-boarding or worse forms of torture.
The existence and destruction of the tapes was first revealed
on Thursday by CIA Director Michael Hayden in a letter to CIA
employees. Hayden issued the letter only after the government
was informed by the New York Times Wednesday that the newspaper
planned to publish an article on the topic.
Haydens letter attempts to create a rationale for what
was clearly a move to hide the governments actions from
American and world public opinion and destroy evidence of criminal
activity by CIA operatives and government officials, up to and
including President Bush.
As the CIA well knew, if the tapes had become publicespecially
in the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib revelationsthey would
have evoked a wave of shock and revulsion in the United States
and around the world, and confirmed that Abu Ghraib, far from
an aberration, was the outcome of US government policy.
Hayden made the improbable claim that the tapes were destroyed
to protect CIA interrogators from retaliation by Al Qaeda. He
wrote in his letter that the CIA halted the practice of taping
interrogations in 2002, after only a few recordings had been made.
The Times reported that the tapes were destroyed in
part because officers were concerned that video showing harsh
interrogation methods could expose agency officials to legal risks,
several officials said.
If this statement is true, it is clear evidence of obstruction
of justice. The officials also said that CIA officers had
judged that the release of photos or videos depicting his interrogation
would provoke a strong reaction. That is, the destruction
involved a conspiracy to prevent the population from learning
of the actions of the American government.
The tapes were destroyed in late 2005, as the extent of the
CIA program of abusive interrogations was first coming to public
light. On November 2, 2005, the Washington Post published
the first report on the CIA interrogation program overseas. Subsequent
reports detailed the techniques used, and on November 18, ABC
News reported that one of these techniques was water-boarding.
ABC reported on December 5, 2005 that one of the prisoners involved
in the program was Zubaydah, and that he had been held in a CIA
prison in Thailand.
The destruction of the tapes also took place in the context
of the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, accused of conspiring in the
September 11 attacks. Moussaouis lawyers wanted to review
any videotapes of interrogations of Al Qaeda members in order
to demonstrate that Moussaoui was not involved in plans for the
attacks.
In 2003 and again in 2005, US District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema
ordered the prosecutors to disclose whether any interrogations
had been recorded, but the government refused to comply. On November
3, 2005, Brinkema asked about videotapes of specific interrogations.
On November 14, the government reported that it did not have any
tapes of these interrogations.
It is not clear exactly when the tapes were destroyed. According
to the Washington Post, however, the destruction
came after the November 14 response to Brinkema. According a CIA
spokesman, the videotapes destroyed were not among those specifically
requested by Brinkema.
Last month, the government acknowledged that it had in its
possession two videotapes and one audiotape that it had failed
to report in 2005, but again did not mention the video tapes that
it had destroyed. The revelation of the destroyed tapes is only
the latest in a pattern of government misconduct in the prosecution
of Moussaoui.
There were several other investigations and lawsuits ongoing
at the time the tapes were destroyed. Among these was a Freedom
of Information request brought by the American Civil Liberties
Union. In August 2004, a judge ordered the government to turn
over all records relating to interrogation or explain why the
records could not be released.
Before being destroyed, the tapes were also withheld from the
commission established by the Bush administration and Congress
to investigate the attacks of September 11. The 9/11 Commission
issued its final report in 2004, one year before the tapes were
destroyed, but it was never informed of their existence.
The Times quotes Philip Zelikow, who served as executive
director of the commission, as saying, The commission did
formally request material of this kind from all relevant agencies,
and the commission was assured that we had received all the material
responsive to our request. No tapes were acknowledged or turned
over, nor was the commission provided with any transcript prepared
for recordings.
The Times goes on to report, Daniel Marcus, a
law professor at American University who served as general counsel
for the Sept. 11 commission and was involved in the discussion
about interviews with Qaeda leaders, said he had heard nothing
about any tapes being destroyed. If the tapes were destroyed,
he said, its a big deal, its a very big deal,
because it could amount to obstruction of justice to withhold
evidence being sought in a criminal or fact-finding investigation.
The 9/11 Commission was from the beginning intended as a whitewash
of government inaction and likely foreknowledge of the terrorist
attacks. The fact that the commission was denied access to interviews
of an individual who was purportedly a close associate of Osama
bin Laden only underscores the fraudulence of its findings.
In addition to depicting torture, it is possible that the interrogation
of Zubaydah included information contradicting the official story
of September 11. This would explain why no transcript of the interrogation
was provided to the commission.
In his letter to CIA employees, Hayden wrote: Beyond
their lack of intelligence valueas interrogation sessions
had already been exhaustively detailed in written channelsand
the absence of any legal or internal reasons to kept them, the
tapes posed a serious security risk. Were they ever to leak, they
would permit identification of your CIA colleagues who had served
in the program, exposing them and their families to retaliation
from Al Qaeda and its sympathizers.
These are flat-out lies. The suggestion that there was no reason
to keep the tapes is absurd, as Zubaydah was at the time under
US custody and potentially faced some form of trial or military
judicial proceeding. He has since been transferred to Guantánamo
Bay and may be brought before a military commission. Videotapes
of his interrogation would obviously be one of the most critical
pieces of evidence in such proceedings.
As for the question of security, it would be a simple matter
to obscure the identity of the interrogators in any videotape,
if this were really the governments concern. According to
Haydens logic, the CIA would have to destroy any document
in its possession identifying CIA interrogators, to prevent them
from being leaked.
The threadbare character of Haydens attempt to justify
the tapes destruction only serves to highlight the criminal
intentions of the government.
Complicity of the Democratic Party
A central question emerges from these revelations: Who knew
about the tapes and their destruction, and when did they know
it? The answer to this question points to the complicity of the
entire political establishment in the cover-up of torture.
In his letter, Hayden declared, The decision to destroy
the tapes was made within CIA itself. Haydens claim
that the decision to eliminate the evidence was entirely internal
to the CIA is almost certainly a lie. It is highly unlikely that
the tapes were destroyed without the knowledge and approval of
top administration officials.
According to the New York Times, the decision was made
by Jose Rodrigueza long-time CIA operative who at the time
occupied the high-ranking position of head of the Directorate
of Operations, in charge of clandestine and covert actions. Until
shortly before his retirement in September, Rodriguezs identity
was classified.
The Times report quotes two former intelligence
officials as saying that then-CIA director Porter GossRodriguezs
direct superiorwas not told of the decision and was angered
when he learned of the tapes destruction.
For his part, Bush was quick to issue a carefully hedged denial
of knowledge. White House spokesman Dana Perino said on Friday
that Bush has no recollection of being made aware of the
tapes or their destruction before yesterday.
The CIA has said that it received direct authorization to use
the methods employed in the videos, though the form of this authorization
has never been released to the public. This position was reiterated
by Hayden on Wednesday, when he wrote in his letter, Before
[the interrogation procedures] were used, they were reviewed and
approved by the Department of Justice and by other elements of
the Executive Branch.
This means that ultimate responsibility for any actions depicted
in the videos lies with Bush, Cheney, former Attorney General
John Ashcroft and others in the administration. In this sense,
the videos are more damaging even than the photographs of torture
at Abu Ghraib, which the government could claim was the unauthorized
behavior of a few individuals.
Bush has repeatedly declared that the US does not torture,
but the tapes would provide incontrovertible proof that it does.
Hayden also insisted, The leaders of our oversight committees
in Congress were informed of the videos years ago and of the Agencys
intention to dispose of the material. This would include
the ranking members of the Senate and House intelligence committees
at the time, Democratic Representative Jane Harman and Senator
Jay Rockefeller, and the Republican chairmen, Representative Pete
Hokestra and Senator Pat Roberts.
A spokesman Hoekstra denied any knowledge of the tapes, but
remarks from Harman and Rockefeller confirm Haydens account.
The Associated Press reported that Harman was one of
only four members of Congress informed of the tapes existence,
and cited her as saying she objected to the destruction
when informed of it in 2003.
I told the CIA that destroying videotapes of interrogations
was a bad idea and urged them in writing not to do it, Harman
said.
This is a dodge. Harman, and therefore the Democratic Party,
knew of the tapes in 2003, but decided not to inform the American
people or do anything to expose the governments policy of
torture. This knowledge was withheld from the American people
throughout the Abu Ghraib scandal, which began in 2004. The tapes
existence was known by leading Democrats two years before the
American people were first made aware that the US government had
used water-boarding.
The AP goes on to report, While key lawmakers were briefed
on the CIAs intention to destroy the tapes, they were not
notified two years later when the spy agency went through with
the plan. It reports that Rockefeller only learned
of the tapes destruction in November 2006.
Even if one were to accept this account as true, it means that
the Democrats have known for over a year that these tapes were
destroyed but decided to say nothing about it.
In September 2006, Rockefeller voted, along with 11 other Democrats
in the Senate, for the Military Commissions Act. Both that act
and the Detainee Treatment Act, passed in December 2005, included
provisions shielding CIA operatives and Bush administration officials
from prosecution for torture and other war crimes.
From the beginning of the Bush administration, the Democratic
Party has played a critical role in facilitating the massive attack
on democratic rights and legal constraints. It has helped confirm
the nomination of all the administration officials who have spearheaded
a policy of tortureincluding Hayden and, most recently,
Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who was approved by a Democratic-controlled
Senate despite his refusal to denounce water-boarding as torture.
The complicity of the Democrats in covering up the existence
and destruction of the videotapes means that any investigation
will be a whitewash. On Friday, Rockefeller said the Senate Intelligence
Committee would review the full history and chronology of
the tapes, how they were used and the reasons for destroying them,
and any communication about them that was provided to the courts
and Congress. Senator Edward Kennedy called on the Justice
Departmentheaded by Mukaseyto open an investigation.
The Democrats are now pushing for a bill that would bar the
CIA from using enhanced interrogation techniques,
knowing full well that if passedwhich appears unlikelyit
will simply be vetoed by Bush.
By itself, the destruction of the CIA torture tapes constitutes
a sufficient basis for impeachment of top government officials.
It comes on top of revelations of massive domestic spying and
illegality. It was done by a government that routinely violates
and ignores laws, launches illegal wars of aggression, and conspires
against the democratic rights of the American people.
But the Democratic leadership has resolutely, since winning
control of both houses of Congress over a year ago, ruled out
any impeachment investigation. No serious hearings or investigations
have been carried out into the Bush administrations torture
program and other brazen violations of American and international
law under the Democratic Congress.
There may be fall-out from the destruction of the videos. Some
lower-level individuals may be made fall guys for the White House
and the CIA. But the Bush administration is counting with good
reason on the Democrats to keep things under control.
This new revelation underscores the lawless character of the
clique around Bush and the immense dangers it represents to the
democratic rights of the people. It also highlights the Democratic
Partys lack of any serious commitment to the defense of
democratic rights. These rights can be defended only through the
independent political mobilization of the working population against
the two-party political establishment and the US ruling elite
whose interests it serves.
See Also:
Appeals court panel bars key
evidence from lawsuit against NSA spying
[19 November 2007]
Democrats cave in on torture:
Key senators back attorney general nominee
[3 November 2007]
Red Cross confirms Bush administration,
CIA used torture in interrogations
[7 August 2007]
Bush sanctions CIA torture
program
[23 July 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |