|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Spain
Delphis exit from Spain to be followed by other relocations
By Marcus Morgan
8 August 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Following the announcement in February that the Delphi-owned
Puerto Real factory in Cadiz would be closed due to unprofitable
operating costs, the automotive parts manufacturer has left Spain
with a severance deal of 120 million euros (US$163 million) for
the 1,600 workers left jobless. Workers voted overwhelmingly to
accept the offer negotiated between the unions and the company.
According to reports in the Spanish press, the company is also
preparing to hand over the factory assets to the regional government,
estimated to be worth 160 million euros, and promises to take
on additional debt to help fund industrial regeneration.
The Puerto Real plant is located in the southern region of
Andalucia, one of Spains poorest regions. Unemployment is
above 100,000, at a rate of 14 percent, the third highest in the
country.
Delphi was originally owned by General Motors, but was spun
off in 1999, as GM itself tried to cut costs by closing factories.
Delphi filed for bankruptcy protection in October 2005. Known
as Chapter 11 in the United States, bankruptcy protection gives
a firm a limited time to regain profitability while protected
from its creditors. The Spanish subsidiary filed for an insolvency
proceeding in March.
Delphi spokesman Ignacio Campos Garcia blamed the decision
to close the Puerto Real plant on operating losses of 150 million
euros over the past five years and high operating costs. The future
of three other Spanish Delphi plants is also uncertain. Plants
at Pamplona, Tarazona, and one east of Barcelona now face the
threat of closure, with the loss of 4,000 jobs.
Under the terms of the agreement worked out between Delphi,
the Spanish government and the largest union, the UGT (aligned
to the ruling Socialist Party-PSOE), the firm will pay the Puerto
Real workers a severance package of 45 days pay for every
year they have worked. Delphi had to obtain the release of the
money from the US bankruptcy courts. If the deal had fallen through,
they told the courts, the Spanish government could have dismissed
the settlement and reverted to a 2005 agreement under which they
would have been liable to cover 60 days pay for every year
workers had worked, as well as continuing paying wages until 2010.
The trade unions and government officials present the closure
of the plant, with the loss of hundreds of jobs, and the smooth
exit strategy of Delphi, as some kind of Pyrrhic victory for the
workers. They claim it is a warning to other transnational corporations
considering a similar course of action. It is, rather, a clear
indication of the role they have played in betraying the struggle
against closure.
Antonio Fernández, the head of the regional labour department,
tried his best to give a positive sheen to the events with a hollow
and almost comical threat: It is a warning to any company
looking to pull out that it will have to leave its assets behind
in Andalucia. Without explaining how these assets
of specialised machine tools and technology can be maintained
as a viable productive facility, he made the vague assertion the
factory would be utilised for alternative industrial projects.
Aside from recycling, it is difficult to imagine what kind of
industry he has in mind.
In like manner, the head of the UGT, José Barriga, commented,
It is harsh signing a deal to close a factorys 1,600-strong
workforce, but the agreement we have is the lesser of two evils,
since Delphi wanted to pay the minimum severance of 20 days
pay per year.
The closure in Spain coincides with Delphis acceptance
of a new bid from the private equity firm Appaloosa Management
LP and others to invest up to US$2.55 billionafter turning
down proposals from other competitors such as Cerberus Capital
Management, which recently bought out Chrysler in the United States.
Delphi was already intending to close 20 of its least productive
plants and transfer production to areas of lower labour costs.
It was also seeking to restructure its administrative departments
away from better-paid European and North American workers. There
can be little doubt that the new directors will pursue further
closures and job cuts.
Some political conclusions must be drawn. Opposition to the
closure has failed, with the direct collusion of the UGT and the
PSOE government of Prime Minister Zapatero. It was not until April
20 that union leaders were forced to call a general strike. They
confined this to 14 towns. Rather than seeking to unite Puerto
Real workers with other Delphi workers internationally, the unions
made their central demand that Zapatero should intervene directly
to prevent the job losses and take legal action against Delphi
for its breach of the original agreement with the government.
They focused the strikes and protests on demanding that jobs and
industry be kept in Andalucia.
The industrial plan stipulated that Delphi would
enjoy special treatment in the form of low corporate taxes and
subsidies on condition that it remains within Spain until at least
2010. According to Andalusian authorities, Delphis Puerto
Real plant has received regional and central government grants
worth 60 million euros since 1986. But the possible illegality
of Delphis exit has been passed over by the PSOE in virtual
silence, and the limited compensation deal has been lauded as
a smokescreen to conceal this betrayal.
These developments follow a similar pattern to that of workers
experiencing job losses and wage cuts in the US. The United Auto
Workers (UAW), the largest Delphi union in the US, has assisted
Delphi in imposing wage cuts and the shutdown of several plants.
The central agreement between the UAW and Delphi, affecting about
16,000 workers at 21 plants, is to cut workers wages from
US$27.00 an hour to US$18.50.
Delphi has applied to the courts to reject labour agreements,
particularly on pension and health care provisions, allowing it
to cut its global workforce by as much as a quarter and eventually
reduce wages by 25 percent internationally.
The experiences in Spain reflect the same process that is taking
place across the advanced capitalist nationsthe relocation
of production to areas able to fulfil capitals need for
cheap labour and low taxes.
In the 1980s, Spain was able to provide these requirements
as one of the lowest-wage countries in the EU, but this is no
longer the case. These conditions are now being met in areas of
eastern Europe and Asia.
Almost immediately after the plant closure in Spain, Delphi
announced that a new factory in Romania would be built. Wage levels
in Romania, the recent and newest entrant into the European Union,
are among the lowest on the continent. According to the Romanian
state news agency, the factory will be ready by 2012 and will
produce injectors and other components for diesel engines and
employ more than 1,000 workers. Delphis former parent company,
GM, is also interested in the new EU member and is in negotiations
with the Romanian government to buy a former Daewoo plant.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |