|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Andrew Young, bagman for US capitalism in Africa
By Lawrence Porter
30 April 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Andrew Young, the former black civil rights leader and confidant
of Martin Luther King Jr., has recently come under criticism for
his dirty dealings with corrupt African governments, especially
for his close relationship with General Olusegan Obasanjo, Nigerias
former president.
Young has followed the well-worn path from protest to politician
to venal corporate bagman. His case is particularly repugnant
in that his earlier struggles against segregation and police repression
in the American South of the 1960s contrast starkly with his present
political alliances with brutal dictators. While operating as
a purveyor for American corporations in their plunder of African
resources, he has, not incidentally, gotten very rich in the process.
Recently both the New York Times and the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution published exposes on Youngs consulting
firm, ironically named GoodWorks International (GWI), as a lucrative
conduit for facilitating US interests in the emerging markets
of Africa.
According to the New York Times article, questions about
Young and GWIs relationship with the corrupt outgoing president
of Nigeria, Olusegun Obasanjo, became a lighting rod for those
opposing Obasanjos anti-democratic policies during the run-up
to the sham elections held last week. (See Call
for Nigerian presidential election to be annulled after massive
corruption.)
The firm advertises that it opens doors for corporations
interested in doing business in Africa and the Caribbean.
The mayor of Atlanta, Shirley Franklin, who is also a friend of
Young, praised GWI for practicing public-purpose capitalism.
This view is not shared by those following human rights issues
in Africa. Andrew Young has never been interested in these
[humanitarian] issues, Femi Falana, president of the West
African Bar Association, told the Times He is just
here making money.
Young put it another way, For 40 years of my life,
he told the Times, I was on the outside seeking change.
I realized that I could be more effective being on the inside
implementing it.
What changes have GWI implemented? As the principal lobbying
agent for the government of Nigeria in the US, it is making millions
representing major companies like ChevronTexaco, General Electric,
and Motorola seeking contracts from the Nigerian government.
The company generally receives a commission equal to 1 ½
percent of a contracts value. This is a tidy sum when GoodWorks
consults on contracts such as General Electric Energys agreement
to provide $400 million in turbines for Nigeria, as they did last
year.
The firm is a major shareholder in a Nigerian energy company,
Suntrust Oil, which won a lease for offshore oil fields. According
to the Atlanta-Journal Constitution, Nigeria provides as much
as 40 percent of GoodWorks revenues, paying $1.75 million to the
company since 2000, not including a retainer fee of $60,000 a
month.
GWI also specializes in relations with other oil-producing
African states, including Sudan and Angola. Moreover, it represents
other American companies among the most notorious for their slave-wages
and environmental destruction in Africa, including Nike, Coca-Cola
and the gold mining concern Barrick Gold, a company connected
with the Bush family
The principals at GWI represent a virtual whos
who of political and corporate Democrats. According to the
Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Young set up GWI in 1997 with
the help of Hamilton Jordon, President Carters former chief
of staff. Foundation directors for GWI include President Bill
Clinton, Alexis Herman, the former Secretary of Labor, and Maurice
Tempelsman, a diamond merchant and fund raiser in the Democratic
Party. Tempelsman has been implicated as an important figure in
the DeBeers diamond cartel in Africa, now known as the blood
diamond business.
Reports indicate that Youngs ties to Africa developed
while he was the US ambassador to the UN in the late 70s, meeting
Obasanjo, the military-installed president of Nigeria, at the
time. Obasanjo and I kind of hit it off immediately,
Young told the Times. We were mainly interested in
democracy.
Actually, Obasanjo was a US operative, closely allied to the
CIA, who took power in 1976 after his predecessor, Murtala Muhammad,
was assassinated under unexplained circumstances. At the time,
the US was still reeling from the OPEC oil embargo and was vitally
concerned with Nigerian oil interests.
When Obasanjo left power the first time, in 1979, he was appointed
to the board of directors of the CIA-run African American Institute,
headed by the former US ambassador to Nigeria Donald B. Easum.
In the 1980s, Obasanjo was sent on high-profile speaking tours
by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the
US Institute for Peace.
Young has defended his relations with Obasanjo, portraying
him as the defender of democracy in Nigeria who has broken the
past practice of corruption that has been rampant since the country
won its independence. Obasanjo has also received the praises of
President George W. Bush and Colin Powell as an example of the
type of democracy they would like to see in Africa.
A very different picture is drawn in the February 14 issue
of the International Herald Tribune, in an article entitled,
Fooling people some of the time, which reports that
Obasanjo has done nothing about corruption in the country with
as much as $600 billion in ill-gotten gains sitting in foreign
bank accounts while the rural farmers live on less than one dollar
a day.
The paper accuses Obasanjo of monopolizing power the
day he entered office, and of keeping the oil portfolio
for himself so that he could use Nigerias vast oil wealth
for political ends. As a result, all politicians in the
government were beholden to him for money.
In an attempt change the constitution so that he could run
a third term, he tried to pressure state governors and members
of Parliament with bribes as high as $400,000, the Herald Tribune
said. Governors who refused were threatened with impeachment,
as was the case with his former ally and vice president, Atiku
Abubakar, who broke with Obasanjo and ran against his hand picked
successor for president.
In 2004 Transparency International ranked Nigeria the most
corrupt regime in Africa. According to the BBC, out of 145 countries,
only Haiti and Bangladesh ranked worse. That year, Obasanjo, despite
sitting on the worlds sixth largest reserves of oil, ended
government subsidies on oil, sparking a series of strikes and
pitched battles in which the police and military murdered protesters.
The removal of subsidies was part of an IMF restructuring program
that Obasanjo imposed with a vengeance.
Who benefits from Andy Youngs relationship with
the government of Nigeria? Its not the Nigerian people,
remarked Ken Silverstein, a reporter for Harpers Magazine.
As I see it, the primary beneficiaries of his work in Nigeria
and elsewhere in Africa are those corrupt, authoritarian regimes
he works with and his private corporate clients.
Young has provided his services both to enrich his clients
and himself, but also to assist the United States as it joins
hands with various blood-soaked dictatorships and strongman in
order to secure American strategic interests in the pivotal continent.
Young is a member of the National Security Study Group and
therefore would have been briefed on the Bush administrations
newly established United States Africa Command (AFRICOM).
Young is aware that the US has developed strategic interests
in the oil states of Africa and has made plans for the establishment
of strategic military bases. West Africa alone has an estimated
15 percent of the worlds oil reserves. And by 2015, the
region is expected to provide 25 percent of the US energy market.
Meanwhile, the funds flowing into GWI and the hands of Andrew
Young are at the expense of the Nigerian and African masses. Despite
the nations wealth in natural resources, 70 percent of its
population of 140 million lives on less than US $1 per day.
See Also:
Call for Nigerian presidential election
to be annulled after massive corruption
[24 April 2007]
Another deadly pipeline
explosion in Nigeria
[29 December 2006]
More than 200 dead
in Lagos suburb: Pipeline explosion highlights legacy of imperialism
in Nigeria
[28 May 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |