|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific : New
Zealand
New Zealand government demands further wage restraint as living
standards decline
By John Braddock
6 July 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
New Zealand Finance Minister Michael Cullen last month warned
workers against expecting significant pay rises, even as the cost
of living sharply increases. Speaking to a parliamentary finance
committee on June 14, Cullen gave his backing to Reserve Bank
Governor Alan Bollard. A week earlier Bollard had proclaimed that
wage restraint was necessary to curb inflation, which the bank
forecast would rise to 3.9 percent.
Bollard warned he would push up interest rates even higher
if workers won extravagant pay rises. Prior to Christmas,
Bollard increased rates to a record 7.25 percentthe ninth
rise since January 2004to dampen spending. The countrys
official cash rate is now among the highest in the OECD.
The Labour finance minister insisted it was important he back
messages from the bank. We cannot afford large wage and
salary increases across the board ... Unfortunately that does
mean you cant expect wage and salaries to compensate you
for what are major shifts in relative prices over which we ourselves
have no control he declared, referring to the countrys
ordinary working people.
Cullen himself received an 8.1 percent pay increase last year,
taking his salary from $226,700 to $245,000 while Bollard received
a pay rise of almost 7 percent, bringing it to more than $480,000.
Emphasising that workers would have to bear the brunt of the
Labour governments anti-inflationary policies, Cullen said
the Reserve Bank could afford to look through the
initial impact on inflation of higher fuel prices, which currently
sees petrol priced at over $1.71 per litre. However, if workers
sought compensation for higher prices, inflation would spike higher,
forcing the bank to lift interest rates.
Significantly Cullens speech took place on the eve of
the first ever national strike by the countrys junior doctors.
It was aimed at sending a message to the business elite that the
government would hold firm against the wage claims by doctors
and radiation therapists. His remarks amounted to a directive
to the 21 district health boards (DHBs) that they could not allow
any increases that would raise costs: Were saying
very clearly that we cant afford large expenditure increases
in that respect. It would be inflationary.
Labours broken promises
In the 2005 elections, faced with an aggressive campaign for
tax cuts waged by the opposition parties, with the support of
economic commentators and the media, Labour posed as the defender
of public services and living standards and as the friend of ordinary
people. On this basis, it was narrowly returned to office for
a third term.
It has not taken long for these promises to be exposed as entirely
bogus. In the health sector, radiation therapists have been struggling
for a minor inflation adjustment to their pay in the face of a
nil pay offer from the DHBs. At the same time, the recent unprecedented
five-day strike by 1,500 junior doctors was the result of the
continual failure of the DHBs and government to address their
appalling working conditions, in which hospital residents typically
work 70 hour weeks and regular rosters involving 18 hour shifts.
Further, the week before the strikes, the Hawkes Bay, Wellington
and Auckland DHBs had announced they were culling thousands from
hospital waiting lists due to lack of funds and an inability to
reduce lengthening queues. Currently 180,000 people are officially
awaiting surgery or specialist assessment, often for more than
12 months. An official announcement was also made that certain
surgical proceduressuch as breast reconstruction surgery
following a mastectomywould no longer be performed in the
public hospital system due to cost constraints.
Cullens blunt declaration that workers should bear the
brunt of impending economic difficulties makes clear that the
Labour government is preparing further attacks on jobs and living
standards as the economic downturn gathers pace. Rushing to endorse
the warnings, Employers & Manufacturers Association chief
executive Alasdair Thompson declared that the outlook for slower
growth and rising inflation raised the spectre of stagflation.
Rising prices and lower growth sets the scene for stagflationrising
prices without real growthwhich hurts everyone, he
said.
A sign of the economic reversalafter five years of consistent
growth and record private sector profitswas revealed a week
after Cullens pronouncements. While economists had forecast
a horror current account deficit for the March quarter,
figures released by Statistics NZ showed the result was significantly
worse than expected.
The March quarter seasonally-adjusted deficit for the countrys
financial dealings with the rest of the world came to $4.1 billionthe
worst quarterly deficit in the 52-year history of the figures,
surpassing the $3.85 billion record set in September 2005. The
quarterly deficit pushed the annual shortfall to a massive $14.5
billionanother record. The worsening debt position, up from
$13.7 billion for the December year, prompted international ratings
agency Standard & Poors to say the chronic
current account deficit position was high and unsustainable,
placing pressure on the countrys credit rating.
The annual deficit equates to 9.3 percent of gross domestic
productthe worst result since the 13 percent recorded during
the first oil shock of 1975. Alarm bells normally ring for international
investors when a countrys deficit hits 5 percent of GDP.
The news immediately sent the NZ dollar spiralling lower against
the United States dollar. This followed an earlier 9 percent plunge
by the currency against the greenback.
Statistics NZ said the widening of the deficit was mainly due
to an increase in imports of goods and services combined with
an increase in profits and earnings extracted by foreign-owned
companies. The price of petrol imports rose for the eighth time
in nine quarters. Imports of goods exceeded exports by $1.058
billion in the quarter, even though the value of exports rose
$190m to $8.15 billion from the December quarter. While export
prices rose 3.2 percent, volumes fell.
The deficit was financed by $7.9 billion of foreign investment
into New Zealand during the quarter, exceeding the $5.8 billion
of New Zealands investment abroad. The banking sector was
the most significant contributor to these transactions. Nearly
$4 billion of the deficit resulted from banks borrowing funds
overseas, primarily for the housing market.
Economic commentators were quick to lay the blame for the ballooning
deficit at the door of working people, with the New Zealand
Herald taking the opportunity to note that the shortfall was
equivalent to overspending of $3500 per person. The
paper attributed this to a nationwide splurge on housing
and consumer goods. Bank of New Zealand economist Craig
Ebert said this is what you get when you have an overheated
economy... it will take a long time to play out and will be an
albatross around the neck of the currency.
Harsh conditions
Such reasoning is being used to prepare the ground for even
sharper inroads into livings standards. Far from engaging in extravagant
binge buying, ordinary people are struggling, under ever more
difficult circumstances, to make ends meet. Last years average
wage increase of 3.1 percent was below the rate of inflation,
currently running at 3.4 per cent.
Most ordinary workers are only sustaining their daily lives
by plunging ever more deeply into debt. Reserve Bank data released
last week showed ongoing growth in credit card debt. The average
daily total owed by all New Zealanders on credit cards in April
was $4.29 billion, up 7 percent on the same month a year ago.
Total household debt is now about $128 billion, an increase of
$32 billion in just two years.
The increasingly fragile conditions that many people confront
has been brutally exposed with the onset of winterwith record
snowfalls and the coldest temperatures in 34 years. While a 4-hour
power blackout in the main city of Auckland on June 12 saw business
leaders fulminating about a purported $70 million loss in production,
hundreds of rural families in the central South Island went for
nearly 14 days without electricity or telephone connections after
basic services failed.
Although winter is only a month old, the burden is already
falling hardest on the low paid and welfare beneficiaries, as
families battle to pay soaring power bills and the elderly scrimp
on heat. In Christchurch, the South Islands main city, the
local newspaper reported that the Salvation Army had distributed
140 food parcels in the first fortnight in June, compared with
its usual 40. Age Concern paid power bills for 35 people in the
same periodcompared with 81 in the whole of last yearto
prevent disconnections.
A Salvation Army spokesman said people were going to the food
bank because they were short of cash after paying power bills.
Some had decided to go without food to keep the power on, while
others were asking for blankets so they could stay warm without
using electricity. Many were working families whose part-time
work has slowed down over the winter.
Age Concern Canterbury chief executive Andrew Dickerson said
there were elderly people suffering extreme hardship. His organisation
had found people whose electricity had been disconnected some
months before. Dickerson said those most in need were over 75,
suffered chronic health conditions, were in financial hardship
and typically lived alone. The temperature in the homes of some
elderly people reached only 10 degrees Celsius and the inhabitants
were forced to use candles and torches, and to visit the local
mall for hot drinks. Two-thirds of respondents to a recent Grey
Power survey reported difficulty paying their electricity bills.
Meanwhile, the main preoccupation in ruling circles remains
the demand for more market reforms, attacks on public services
and tax cuts. In the May budget, Labour rejected the renewed calls
for tax cuts after bringing down a $8.48 billion surplus. At the
time, Cullen argued they would take money away from health, education
and infrastructure investment. Moreover, in light of Treasury
warnings of a turn in the economy, and economic growth expected
at just 1 percent next ear, Cullen warned tax cuts were unaffordable.
To have tax cuts at this point would have to be balanced
by comparable cuts to expenditure, he told reporters. There
is no free lunch in this years budget at all.
Later, however, the finance minister raised the possibility
of tax cuts at the next election, telling TV3s Campbell
Live programme: We havent got tax cuts yet, but we
may in a year or twos time.
See Also:
New Zealand: CEO pay skyrockets
as workers' living standards fall
[5 June 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |