|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East
Washington, Tel Aviv threaten Syria and Iran
Ground invasion of Lebanon looms after Israel bombs Beirut
airport, imposes blockade
By Chris Marsden and Barry Grey
14 July 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Following a major escalation of military strikes on Lebanon
Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Friday ordered
a further intensification of attacks by warplanes, heavy artillery
and gunboats stationed off the Lebanese coast. Following a late-night
meeting between Olmert and security officials, Israeli Army Radio
quoted political sources as saying, The decision was made
to intensify Israels operations in Lebanon.
Soon after, early Friday morning, Middle East time, Israeli
aircraft struck the main highway linking Beirut with the Syrian
capital, Damascus. That attack was aimed at consolidating the
land, sea and air blockade imposed by Israel on Lebanon on Thursday,
and sending yet another signal to Syria that it might be targeted
by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF).
Israel initially claimed its military assault, the biggest
air attack on Lebanon in 20 years, was aimed at forcing Hezbollah,
the political-military organisation that controls southern Lebanon
and that captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid
Wednesday, to return the soldiers. This was belied by the scale
of the Israeli attack, and the Israeli government rapidly escalated
its demands to encompass the removal of Hezbollah from its positions
near the Israeli border.
After a day of heavy bombing of Lebanese targets from the land,
air and sea, resulting in the deaths of 55 Lebanese civilians
and the wounding of at least 100 more, Israeli officials were
increasingly talking of breaking Hezbollah and carrying
out a long-term operation in the country. At the same time, they
repeatedly accused Syria and Iran, which have long supported Hezbollah,
of orchestrating the groups actions, a theme that was echoed
in the statements of US officials.
On Thursday, Israel bombed the Beirut airport twice. The first
attack, from the air, left huge craters in all three runways,
forcing the closure of the facility. The second, by means of shells
fired from gunboats, ignited two fuel depots. Israel also struck
two military air bases located near the Syrian border and hit
roads, bridges, power stations and villages in the southern part
of the country. Three facilities of the pro-Hezbollah Al Manar
television channel in Beirut and elsewhere were also bombed. In
all, Israel hit over 100 targets.
At the same time, Israeli naval forces imposed a sea blockade,
turning back ships seeking to deliver supplies to Lebanon.
Israeli officials made clear that no part of Lebanon would
be safe from attack, and Israeli warplanes dropped leaflets over
the Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs of Beirut, warning residents
to evacuate. Thousands of Lebanese civilians in the south and
in Beirut packed up their belongings and sought to flee to Syria,
the only border open to them.
Hezbollah, for its part, fired more than 80 Katyusha rockets
into northern Israel, hitting 20 towns and villages. Israeli authorities
said 2 civilians were killed and 43 were wounded in the rocket
attacks. Hezbollah also said it bombarded the headquarters of
the northern Israeli military command in Safad with dozens of
rockets. It further claimed to have repulsed an Israeli military
force that tried early Thursday morning to move across the border
into Lebanese territory.
Israel is using Thursdays firing of Katyusha rockets
into Haifa as justification for a possible ground invasion. Hezbollah
denied firing rockets into the city of 250,000 some 30 miles south
of the Lebanese border.
Israel brushed aside this disavowal on Thursday, and Israels
ambassador to the US, Daniel Ayalon, called the rocket firings
on Haifa a major, major escalation.
All options are available, Israeli Army spokesman
Captain Jacob Dallai said early Friday when asked about a ground
offensive. Strategically speaking, if the third largest
city in Israel is under attack, its a big thing and a response
can be expected.
Israel has called up its reserves and appears to be setting
the stage for a full-scale invasion with its demands that the
Lebanese government clear Hezbollah fighters out of their positions
along the Lebanese-Israeli border and deploy the Lebanese army
in their place. Any such move, as Israel well knows, would provoke
a civil war in Lebanon, where Hezbollah is supported by much of
the countrys poor Shiite population and holds posts in both
the parliament and the cabinet of Prime Minister Fuad Siniora.
While Israels aggression against Lebanon has evoked condemnatory
statements from the European Union, Russia and France, the United
States has defended it, giving Israel, publicly at least, a green
light to escalate its attacks. Speaking at a joint press conference
in Germany with Chancellor Angela Merkel on Thursday, President
Bush cast Israel as the victim of terrorist aggression and said,
Israel has the right to defend itself.
Implying that Israel, which is already in the second week of
a brutal incursion into Gaza, was a force for peace, Bush added,
There are a group of terrorists who want to stop the advance
of peace.
In a direct threat to Damascus, Bush declared, Syria
needs to be held to account.
Bushs only caution was, Whatever Israel does should
not weaken the Siniora government in Lebanon. This government,
pro-US and anti-Syria, is the product of a US-backed campaign
that forced Syria to withdraw its troops from Lebanon.
Siniora has denounced Israels open-ended aggression,
while insisting he had no foreknowledge of Wednesdays Hezbollah
border raid. He instructed Lebanons ambassador to the United
States, Farid Abboud, to return to Beiruit after he made statements
supporting Hezbollah in an interview with CNN.
The US underscored its backing for Israeli aggression on Thursday
by vetoing a United Nations Security Council resolution sponsored
by Qatar that called for Israel to immediately end its military
incursion into Gaza, which has killed scores of Palestinian civilians
and created a humanitarian disaster. Ten of the councils
15 members voted in favour of the resolution, 4 others abstained,
and the US cast the only no vote.
Within Israel itself, there is growing anxiety over the prospect
of full-scale war with Lebanon and an even wider conflagration
in the region. This was reflected in an editorial published in
Haaretz under the headline No to Lebanon War II.
Warning that an outburst of Israels tremendous
power can easily get totally out of control, the newspaper
wrote that Syria, too, is liable to be seen as an appropriate
target, and concluded: Israel must not let the abductions
drag it into a regional war.
However, both the Israeli and US governments are blaming Syria
and Iran for the eruption of violence, pointing to a widening
of the war to target one or both of these countries.
A senior Israeli Foreign Ministry official, Gideon Meir, told
reporters Thursday that Israel had concrete evidence that
Hezbollah plans to transfer the kidnapped soldiers to Iran,
without providing any evidence for the claim or revealing its
supposed source. He continued: Israel views Hamas, Hezbollah,
Syria and Iran as the main players in the axis of terror and hate
that endangers not only Israel, but the entire world.
The White House issued a statement declaring, Hezbollahs
actions are not in the interests of the Lebanese people, whose
welfare should not be held hostage to the interests of the Syrian
and Iranian regimes.
National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones said, We
also hold Syria and Iranwhich directly support Hezbollahresponsible
for this attack and for the ensuing violence.
See Also:
Israel launches military assault on Lebanon
[13 July 2006]
Major powers complicit in Israeli war
crimes
[5 July 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |