|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
Amnesty International documents European complicity in secret
US rendition programme
Part 2: Collaborating with CIA kidnappers
By Martin Kreickenbaum
29 April 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The following is the second of a two-part article. The first part was posted April 28.
New details on the practice of illegal kidnapping and the secret
internment of alleged terror suspects carried out by the US secret
service agency, the CIA, emerged in a report issued by the human
rights organisation Amnesty International earlier this
month. (See Below
the radar: Secret flights to torture and disappearance).
The evidence presented by Amnesty on the practice of
renditions and American secret prisons is strikingly
comprehensive. While some details are already well known, the
report makes clear the extent to which European governments were
prepared to look the other way and even indulge in open cooperation
with the illegal CIA practices.
In 1995, then-US President Bill Clinton had already approved
the practice of abducting alleged terror suspects from foreign
countries. At the time, however, the official goal was to bring
these persons to the US in order to place them on trial. After
September 11, 2001, the entire programme was put exclusively into
the hands of the CIAand terror suspects were
no longer taken to the US. Instead, they were brought for interrogation
to secret prisons located in Syria, Jordan or Egypt. European
airports were regularly used as transit stopovers for planes carrying
those kidnapped. In other cases, the CIA directly kidnapped suspects
from European countries.
The German government had no problems with this practice. Two
German citizens were kidnapped by the CIA as they travelled abroad:
Khaled el-Masri, who was abducted in Macedonia, then transported
to Afghanistan and tortured; and Muhammad Haydar Zammar, who was
kidnapped in Morocco and incarcerated in the notorious Far
Falastin prison in Syria.
According to the official story, German authorities only learned
about the kidnapping of Zammar from the press. Nevertheless, six
German secret service officials were sent to Damascus in order
to cross-examine the German-Syrian Zammar, who was suspected of
involvement in a terrorist cell. It is well known that prisoners
at the Far Falastin are subjected to severe forms of torture.
While the German government has requested an explanation from
the Syrian government for the arrest, it has done nothing to secure
the release of Muhammad Zammar. In October 2004, Zammar was removed
from Far Falastin, and since then his location remains unknown.
In June 2005, his family received a final short letter, which
had been passed on by the International Red Cross.
The case of Abu Omar follows a similar pattern. He was kidnapped
in Italy by a group of 25 CIA agents and then flown to Egypt via
the Ramstein US military airport in Germany.
Claims by Germany and other European countries that their secret
services and authorities knew nothing of the activities of the
CIA are utterly implausible. In Paris, the secret services of
Australia, Canada, France and Germany maintain an anti-terror
centre together with the US under the pseudonym Alliance
Base. This is a centre for the exchange of information that
is collected worldwide. According to a report in the Süddeutsche
Zeitung from January, however, the US is the only country
that has direct access to individuals.
Even with its modest means, the human rights organisation Amnesty
was able to uncover more information over the practice of
renditions, transferrals and internments than national authorities
were prepared to acknowledge. Its documentation clearly reveals
the extent of the network of CIA bogus companies and points out
that in the most cases the same airplanes were repeatedly used
by the US secret service for renditionsi.e.,
illegal abductions.
Altogether, Amnesty documents more than 1,000 flight activities
that are directly linked with the CIA and its abductions and transferrals,
often involving intermediate stops at European airports. These
flights were carried out by front companies such as Stevens Express,
Keeler and Tate Management or Premier Executive Transport. An
additional 1,600 flights involved normal charter planes
frequently employed by the CIA.
Amongst the planes used by CIA cover firms was a Boeing 737
with the registration number N1313P, whose operations included
transporting Khaled el-Masri from Macedonia to Afghanistan. The
Boeing undertook direct flights from Afghanistan to Poland and
Romania, and also landed no less than 76 times on German soil
and on 52 occasions at British airports.
Press reports have referred most frequently to the activities
of the Gulfstream V airplane with the registration number N379P
in connection with renditions. A total of no less
than 590 flight activities by this plane were documented between
February 2001 and September 2005. The Gulfstream V landed 76 times
in Germany and on 58 occasions in Great Britain.
Both aircraft made repeated flights to Afghanistan, Egypt,
Uzbekistan, Morocco, Djibouti, Poland and Romania. In some of
these countries, it has been established that the US maintains
secret prisons; in other countries, their location remains unknown.
It is noteworthy that the CIA cover firms and the charter companies
used by the CIA have landing and tanking rights at American military
bases all over the worlda privilege shared by just 10 commercial
airlines.
European governments are determined to hoodwink the public
into believing that they knew nothing of the activities of the
CIA on their territory. In doing so, they have declared their
hands were tied by the agreement over international civil aviation,
known as the Chicago Convention, which prevents the stopping or
searching of private flights. This is just another lie.
According to the Chicago Convention, commercial and military
international flights must be registered and approved by the respective
states. On the other hand, it is not necessary to register private
flights, nor can they be searched or requested to reveal their
purpose. European governments are now using this principle to
cover up their complicity.
In fact, every state has the right to force a plane to land
and undertake a search if it has reasonable grounds to conclude
that it is being used for any purpose inconsistent with the aims
of the convention. Such reasonable grounds must
include the flagrant abuse of human rights involved in illegal
kidnapping and internment in secret prisons. Accordingly, European
governments were not only empowered, they had the international
legal obligation to stop the CIA flights.
In addition, the use of charter aircraft by the CIA flights
qualifies as commercial flight operations. These would then be
subject to state approval, requiring the airline concerned to
announce the flight eight days beforehand and naming the pilot
and purpose of the flight.
The extent of involvement by the German government in these
illegal practices was revealed by the false statement made by
the undersecretary of state in the Foreign Office, Klaus Scharioth,
who was responding to a question in the German parliament. Scharioth
maintained that only military flights were subject to approval.
This is legally incorrect and aimed at covering up the fact that
German authorities approved the CIA flights.
Already in December of last year, the human rights organisation
Statewatch published an agreement struck between the European
Union and the US in 2003 that allows the US to use European airports
for the transportation of criminal foreigners. In
line with this agreement, the German government has given its
official seal of approval to the CIA flights, and the connected
practices of kidnapping, transferrals and internments.
In the course of investigations over CIA activities in Europe
carried out by the Council of Europe, just 1 of the total of 46
European states has officially admitted to delivering
suspects to foreign agents in violation of the standards of international
law. The remark was made by Terry Davies, Secretary-General
of the Council of Europe, in the middle of April in Strasbourg.
He was unwilling, however, to identify the country in question.
All other European states maintain they knew nothing about such
activities and have deplored what they claim is the lack of means
to be able to deal with the violations of human rights by
secret agents from friendly states.
See Also:
Britain: Government minister
admits US rendition planes landed in UK
[8 March 2006]
Document proves European
Union agreed to CIA rendition flights
[17 December 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |