|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Korea
South Korea admits to carrying out secret nuclear experiments
By Peter Symonds
6 September 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
South Koreas confession last week that its nuclear scientists
secretly conducted experiments into uranium enrichment in 2000
has served to highlight the rank hypocrisy surrounding the Bush
administrations stance on the proliferation of so-called
weapons of mass destruction.
It does not require a great deal of imagination to surmise
Washingtons response if North Korea or Iran made similar
admissions. The White House has previously seized on any evidence
of uranium enrichment programs to accuse the countries of building
nuclear weapons and to threaten retaliatory action. As for Iraq,
its non-existent nuclear weapons program constituted a major element
of the Bush administrations justification for the invasion
and neo-colonial subjugation of the country.
It is quite different, however, with South Korea, a long-standing
strategic US ally in North East Asia. Seoul publicly acknowledged
last Thursday that scientists at a government research centre
had conducted a series of experiments over several months in early
2000 that enriched small amounts of uranium. Foreign Ministry
spokesman Oh Joon played down the tests as a one-off event,
declaring: South Korea has never had, and does not have,
enrichment or nuclear reprocessing programs, let alone a weaponisation
program.
The government and South Korean media followed a similar line
insisting that the experiments had been conducted by a rogue
group of scientists without government support or knowledge. Chang
In Soon, president of the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute,
told the media that government scientists had enriched an amount
of uranium smaller than a sesame seed merely to
satisfy their curiosity. Some misunderstood this experiment
as a step to build nuclear weapons, but atomic energy experts
would probably laugh at such claims, he said.
At this stage, South Korean authorities have divulged very
little information about the experiments. The media has not been
allowed into the research facility at Taejon, about 160 kilometres
south of Seoul. Officials claim that just 0.2 grams of enriched
uranium were produced using a laser technique. Reports vary as
to the level of enrichment achievedfrom 10 percent to nearly
80 percent. The latter is just short of the grade required to
manufacture a nuclear weapon.
What is clear, however, is that South Korea has breached the
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which does not ban uranium enrichment
but does require that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
be informed. The claims that the tests were carried out without
official approval or simply out of curiosity are simply not credible.
As spokesman Oh Joon admitted, there is an official ban on such
activities, of which all scientists involved would have been well
aware.
Washington was quick to dismiss the revelations. US State Department
Richard Boucher declared that the experiments should not
have happened but then added: I would say that South
Korea has voluntarily reported this activity. They are co-operating
fully and proactively in order to demonstrate that the activity
has been eliminated and it is no longer cause for concern.
All the indications are, however, that the confession was far
from voluntary. According to the International
Herald Tribune, IAEA inspectors had begun asking pointed questions
about a particular piece of equipment at the Taejon research institute
that they had been barred from visiting. It became clear
to the South Koreans that there would be environmental samples
taken, and the truth would be discovered. So they decided theyd
better disclose it first themselves, a diplomat told the
newspaper.
Even if this were not the case, South Korea was obviously concerned
about the implications of the IAEAs Additional Protocol
which it signed in February. The new measures, which were implemented
at Washingtons insistence and aimed primarily against Iran,
provide for far more intrusive inspections of nuclear facilities
at short notice. South Korea reportedly made a formal disclosure
to the IAEA on August 23. A team of IAEA inspectors has just completed
a visit to the country.
The disclosure raises a number of questions about South Koreas
nuclear plans. The claim by South Korean spokesman Oh Joon that
the country never had nuclear enrichment, reprocessing
or weapons programs is simply false. In the early 1970s, the countrys
military dictator, President Park Chung-Hee, concerned at the
implications of the US defeat in Vietnam and Washingtons
rapprochement with China, established a program to build nuclear
weapons. The regime negotiated with France to build a nuclear
fuel reprocessing facility and sought to procure material, equipment
and expertise through US civilian and military channels.
Under pressure from Washington, Park eventually agreed in 1975
to halt the program in return for a US pledge to stop further
US troop withdrawals from South Korea. However, according to the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute website: In
the late 1970s reports surfaced that the South continued to pursue
this program clandestinely. An opposition lawmaker Kang Chang
Sung stated that in 1978 President Park told him that the countrys
nuclear weapons program was approximately 95 percent complete.
If the reports so far are accurate, it is unlikely that the
experiments in isolation were part of a program to build nuclear
weapons. The use of lasers to enrich uranium has so far proven
to be cumbersome and expensive. But the fact that the tests were
kept secret for four years does pose the obvious question: what
other nuclear research is underway? South Korea already has an
extensive nuclear power industry, which produces about 40 percent
of the countrys electricity requirementsone of the
highest in the world. It thus has considerable scientific expertise
and, if an enrichment or reprocessing facility were established,
to large amounts of the fissionable material required to make
nuclear weapons.
South Koreas revelations can only add to the tensions
in the region. While it is yet to make a public statement, North
Korea can legitimately point to Washingtons double standards
in dealing with respective breaches of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty by Seoul and Pyongyang. South Koreas nuclear experiments
will only lead to further distrust in North Korea and add to the
danger of a regional nuclear arms race.
Reflecting concerns in Japanese ruling circles, an Asahi
Shimbun editorial described the news from South Korea as shocking
and the official explanation as not convincing. The
newspaper pointed out that the disclosure could undermine the
next round of six-nation talks in Beijing that are aimed at pressuring
North Korea to abandon its nuclear programs. Some in Japan
have suggested that Japan should possess nuclear weapons,
it warned. We fear that such an attitude will strengthen
on the news of the South Korean experiment.
The issue is likely to be discussed at an IAEA board meeting
scheduled for September 13. The Bush administration has been seeking
to make Tehrans alleged non-compliance with the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty the basis for referring Iran to the UN
Security Council for the imposition of sanctions. The US will
no doubt press ahead with these plans while at the same time arguing
that South Koreas experiments do not warrant any punitive
actions.
In other words, whether or not a country is branded as a nuclear
threat is determined not so much by their nuclear programs
but by the interests of US imperialism. Washington has targetted
Iran and North Korea, declaring them to be part of an axis
of evil, because these countries represent an obstacle to its
ambitions in the Middle East and North East Asia. India, Pakistan
and Israel have all developed nuclear weapons yet the US has taken
little or no action against these American allies.
The greatest impetus for a nuclear arms race is presented by
the US itself, which has the largest arsenal of nuclear bombs
in the world and the declared intention of building new, more
sophisticated weapons. The Bush administrations subjugation
of Afghanistan and Iraq can only lead North Korea, Iran and others
to conclude that nuclear weaponry is essential if they are to
defend themselves against future US aggression.
See Also:
US backflip over North Korean
nuclear programs
[28 June 2004]
Standoff continues over North
Korea's nuclear programs
[2 February 2004]
Washington scuttles
six-nation talks over North Korean nuclear crisis
[27 December 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |