|
WSWS
: Arts Review
: Film
Festivals
Sydney Film FestivalPart 3
Two perceptive Indian films
By Richard Phillips
7 August 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
This years festival included recent works by Aparna Sen,
Adoor Gopalakrishnan, Mani Ratman and Buddhadeb Dasgupta, some
of Indias more intelligent and humane filmmakers. Consistently
rejecting the escapist themes championed by Bollywood, the dominant
sector of the Indian film industry, these directors have seriously
attempted to examine different aspects of local social and political
life.
The World Socialist Web Site has already commented on
Ratmans A Peck on the Cheek and Dasguptas A
Tale of a Naughty Girl. Here we will review Adoor Gopalakrishnans
Shadow Kill and Mr and Mrs Iyer by Aparna Sen.
Aparna Sen is the daughter of film historian, critic, and filmmaker,
Chidanda Dasgupta. She began her movie career as an actress, first
appearing in Satyajit Rays Sampatti (1961), and starring
in over 20 films before making her directorial debut in 1981 with
36 Chowringhee Lane. Since then she has directed Paroma
(1984), Sati (1989) Yugant (1995) and Paromitar
Ek Din (2000).
Her latest film, Mr and Mrs Iyer, is a contemporary
love story set against the background of anti-Muslim communal
violence. It begins at a small bus terminal somewhere in the mountains
of northern India where relatives, friends and holidaymakers are
about to journey south. Those boarding the crowded bus constitute
a cross section of Indian lifeMuslims, Sikhs, Hindus, higher
and lower castes, middle class and poor. Most of the passengers
cannot speak each others native tongues and so virtually
all of the dialogue is in English. A group of boisterous teenagers,
who spend their time singing Hindi language pop songs, provide
some light relief in the early part of the journey.
The two central figuresRaja Chowdhary (Rahul Bose), a
Bengali wildlife photographer, and Mrs Meenakshi Iyer (Konkona
Sensharma), a Tamil Brahmin woman travelling with her infant son
to meet her husbandhave never met before and would not do
so under normal circumstances. The two, however, are
thrown together by the eruption of ethno-religious violence.
While initial contact between the two is cool, Meenakshi appreciates
Rajas help with her infant son during the hazardous journey
out of the mountains. She begins to warm to his presence, until
she learns of his Muslim background, and pulls back.
Some time during the trip, however, the bus is stopped from
entering a small town that has erupted in a wave of communal violence.
Hindu extremist thugs, determined to avenge the murder of a local
villager, discover the bus, climb aboard and demand to know the
religious background of all on board. They seize an aging Muslim
couple and are preparing to take Raja, when suddenly Mrs Iyer
claims him as her husband.
The thugs eventually depart and early the next morning Raja,
Meenakshi and some of the other passengers make their way to the
town to seek some alternative transport. The place is in chaos,
with Muslim houses destroyed and local police officers turning
a blind eye to the communalist looting. Raja and Meenakshi maintain
their new identity as husband and wife and take refuge for several
days at an abandoned forest guesthouse outside the town, where
they fall in love.
Raja and Meenakshi eventually locate train transport out of
the area and reluctantly go their separate waysMrs Iyer
planning to rejoin her husband and Raja returning to his job.
While little has changed in the world around them, their short-lived
relationship has given them a new sense of humanity. Some of their
previously held religious and cultural confusions have been pushed
back.
Although Mr and Mrs Iyer won a Best Director prize at
Indias National Film Awards this year the film is not a
complete artistic success. While the performances by Rahul Bose
and Konkona Sensharma are particularly strong and convincing,
the films message that love can somehow transcend ethno-religious
bigotry is somewhat simplistic. Nor does the film provide any
indication of the underlying causes of communal violence.
Nonetheless, the film is a sincere and healthy development
and its portrayal of the crazed Hindu chauvinists and the destructive
consequences of their pogrom is frighteningly real. Too few contemporary
Indian filmmakers are prepared to acknowledge, let alone examine,
the rise of religious fundamentalism and its impact.
In one media interview, Aparna Sen said she decided to make
Mr and Mrs Iyer out of deep concern over the
rise of Hindu chauvinism and added: [T]he secularism that
Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi stood up for is almost extinct.
Even among the urban middle class and the upper middle class,
the so-called educated, enlightened class, secularism is absent.
Sens sensitivity to the repudiation of secularism by a section
of the middle class is significant. One hopes that she will begin
to probe this phenomenon in the near future.
Shadow Kill (Nizhalkuthu), the latest feature by veteran
director and screenwriter Adoor Gopalakrishnan, is set in 1941
in a remote village in the princely state of Travancore, today
part of the southwestern Indian state of Kerala. Gopalakrishnans
slow-paced, powerful and at times visually beautiful film centres
on the tragic life of Kaliyappan (Oduvil Unnikrishnan), an aging
state executioner and his family.
Kaliyappan, who was appointed to his position by the local
maharaja, has hanged an innocent young man and is desperately
trying to find a way out of the grisly profession. His employment,
however, was given to his family by royal decree and he cannot
escape it, unless he passes on the job to his son. In exchange
for doing the states dirty work, the executioner and Marakatam
(Sukamari), his long-suffering wife, are provided with a few modest
privileges, including a house, some land and the hanging rope,
which is especially created for each execution.
Local villagers have an ambivalent attitude towards Kaliyappan.
On the one hand they regard him with contempt for doing the dirty
work of the maharaja and the British. But they also believe that
the death rope has healing powers and so bring their sick relatives
to Kaliyappan to be cured of all their ills. In exchange for a
small cash settlement, he burns a small portion of the rope, offers
a prayer to the Hindu goddess Kali and sprinkles the ashes over
the sick person.
Shadow Kill provides an accurate and disturbing glimpse
of the state apparatus created by the British colonial rulers
and their local Indian agents and the treatment of those at the
bottom of the pecking order. Kaliyappan, who is at the beck and
call of the local maharaja, is forced to live in a remote part
of the state, close to the Tamil Nadu border and well away from
the prison or the people he may have to put to death. The maharaja
dictates who will live and die but Kaliyappan, who carries out
his orders, is forced to bear all moral responsibility for the
executions.
Whenever the maharaja gives orders for an execution, for example,
he always has an official pardon ready. While Kaliyappan is directed
to make the long journey to the prison and hang the condemned
man, the maharaja can cynically wash his hands of any responsibility
by issuing a pardon but sending it too late to stop the execution.
The stay of execution always arrives just in time to be read out
over the prisoners body, leaving the executioner to shoulder
all blame for the barbaric act.
As the story unfolds, Kaliyappan, who seeks solace in heavy
drinking bouts, becomes increasingly disoriented and disturbed
as he awaits the next execution order. India is convulsed by political
turmoil with opposition to British rule rising throughout the
country. Although the family is located far from the main centres
of resistance, Muthu, Kaliyappans only son, becomes a strong
supporter of the Quit India movement.
The executioners life is also complicated by increasing
financial demands from his married daughter Madhavi and her unpleasant
husband and the awakening sexual maturity of Mallika, Kaliyappans
youngest daughter. Mallika falls in love with a local youth but
is brutally murdered soon after.
This tragedy, which coincides with a new execution order from
the maharaja, destroys Kaliyappan psychologically. He collapses
just before the hanging, forcing his son to carry out the death
penalty and take over his fathers macabre profession. Having
previously backed the struggle against the British, Muthu becomes
one of its instruments. His decision to become executioner could
very well be a metaphor for those who took control when the British
were forced out of India.
Shadow Kill is a dark and disturbing film with strong
performances by its experienced cast. Oduvil Unnikrishnan as Kaliyappan
is particularly noteworthy.
Adoor Gopalakrishnan has been making films for over 30 years
and is one of Indias most thoughtful contemporary filmmakers.
Explaining the films conclusion and Muthus decision
to take over his fathers job, he said: He is fighting
for freedom, he is part of the whole Gandhian movement. But what
exactly is freedom? Freedom from whom, and to do what? Examine
his story: His father is a hangman; his father gets land, and
other largesse, from the state. The son is against all this, yet
he is dependant on his fathers lands and his income. In
the end, he has a choice to assume his fathers role,
or to starve.
Is that a choice? Freedom means, really, the power to
choose. Does the son have it? The larger issue is, we have fought
for, and got, our freedom, or independence. But is it real freedom?
Are we really free? These are the questions I hope the audience
ends up asking itself.
See Also:
Sydney Film FestivalPart
1
Classic films a festival highlight
[7 July 2003]
Sydney Film FestivalPart
2
Blind Shaft director speaks about filmmaking in China
[18 July 2003]
Sydney Film Festival
2001
Art wedded to truth must, in the end, have its rewards
The Apu Trilogy, written and directed by Satyajit Ray
[2 August 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |