|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East : Iraq
The UN bombing: a product of the US occupation of Iraq
By Peter Symonds
20 August 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
A massive truck bomb yesterday tore through the Canal Hotel
that houses the UN offices in Baghdad killing at least 20 people,
including the top UN official in IraqSergio Vieira de Mello,
and injuring more than 100. The explosion took place at around
4.30 p.m., as a press conference was underway in the three-storey
building that has functioned as the UN headquarters in Iraq since
1991.
The attack was well organised. A concrete truck packed with
an estimated 250 kilograms of C4 military explosives was detonated
outside a newly-built, concrete retaining wall around the UN compound.
The wall offered no protection from the huge blast that destroyed
the front of the building, an adjoining hospital and a number
of cars and shattered windows blocks away.
No organisation has claimed responsibility for the bombing.
It has been immediately seized upon by the Bush administration
to justify further indiscriminate reprisals and repression against
the Iraqi people. At the same time, the attack underscores the
depth of hostility, anger and despair felt by wide sections of
the population in Iraq and throughout the Middle East towards
Washington's criminal occupation of the country. Political responsibility
for the bomb blast rests with the US and its accomplices, who
have created nothing short of a nightmare for the Iraqi people.
US President Bush briefly interrupted a game of golf to make
a banal statement to the media condemning the UN bombing. Every
sign of progress in Iraq adds to the desperation of these terrorists
and the remnants of Saddams brutal regime. The civilised
world will not be intimidated, he declared. The Iraqi
people have been liberated from a dictator. Iraq is on an irreversible
course toward self-government and peace.
His comments stand reality on its head. Washington has not
liberated Iraq but replaced a brutal dictatorship, which it helped
create, with a neo-colonial regime headed by Paul Bremer III,
a proconsul with absolute powers. The Iraqi people are no freer
under Bremer than they were under Saddam Hussein. Under the pretext
of hunting down Baathist remnants, US troops routinely
search people, vehicles and houses, killing or incarcerating anyone
suspected of opposition. Thousands of people are being held, and
in some cases tortured, in US-run jails and detention centres
in flagrant breach of their basic democratic rights.
The purpose of the US-led invasion was not to bring self-government
and peace but to loot the economy, particularly the countrys
huge oil reserves. Much of the limited and decaying physical and
social infrastructure that existed under the previous regime has
been destroyed, leaving masses of people without jobs, basic services
and essentials such as electricity, water and adequate food.
It is hardly surprising in these circumstances that young Iraqis
are joining the ranks of groups advocating armed resistance. Attacks
on US and allied troops are a daily occurrence. In recent days,
basic infrastructure has been targetted with a bomb attack on
a water main in Baghdad and the rupturing of an oil export pipeline
in the north of the country. On August 7, a large car bomb detonated
outside the Jordanian embassy in Baghdad, killing at least 17
people.
A number of US-based analysts and experts have begun speculating
that outsiders, possibly the Al Qaeda network, organised
the bombings at the Jordanian embassy and the UN compound. There
is no direct evidence of such involvement. Even if it turns out
to be the case, however, it simply highlights the fact that the
US invasion has transformed Iraq and the broader region into a
fertile breeding ground for anti-American militia of many different
complexions, including Islamic extremists such as Al Qaeda.
The most significant aspect of yesterdays bombing was
that the UN, and possibly even de Mello himself, were deliberately
targetted. In condemning the blast, various governments in Europe
and the Middle East have bewailed the fact that the UN was attacked.
Syria, for instance, issued a statement urging the UN to continue
its role in helping the Iraqi people restore their freedom
and independence.
But there is no reason why the Iraqi people should see any
difference between the US and the UN. For more than a decade,
the UN has been complicit in all of the crimes of the US and its
allies against the Iraqi people. The UN not only supported the
1990-91 Gulf War but, under the pretext of disarming Iraq, imposed
and supervised the decade-long economic sanctions that resulted
in hundreds of thousands of deaths. While the UN Security Council
drew back from giving a final seal of approval for the US invasion,
all of its members, including Syria, supported last years
resolution 1441, which set the course for war, and this May rubberstamped
the US occupation of Iraq and the plundering of its oil.
The UN headquarters in Baghdad has been a centre for intrigue
and duplicity since its establishment over a decade ago. It was
the base of operations for the UN weapons inspection teams that
were used to spy on and create provocations against the Hussein
regime. It was also used by the UN officials who supervised the
sanctions program that crippled the Iraqi economy and imposed
a decade of deprivation and suffering on the Iraqi population.
De Mello played an integral part in the UNs sordid operations
in Iraq and elsewhere. For three decades after joining the UN
as a young graduate in 1969, de Mello has served as a political
representative of the major powers in one trouble spot after anotherfrom
Cyprus to Bangladesh and Cambodia. He played a prominent role
in imposing the dictates of the US and European powers in the
Balkans during the 1990s. In 1999, he was inserted as the special
UN representative to help manage the NATO occupation of war-ravaged
Kosovo. In late 1999, he took up the post as chief administrator
following the Australian-led takeover of East Timor. When he left
in 2002, the East Timorese people, like their counterparts in
the Balkans, were still mired in poverty and unemployment.
His services were appreciated in the worlds major capitals.
In the discussions in May leading up to the UNs formal endorsement
of the US occupation, the media reported that de Mello was strongly
backed by the Bush administration for the senior UN post in Iraq.
De Mello was even mooted as a possible successor to Kofi Annan
in the post of UN Secretary General. Annans spokesman Fred
Eckhard underscored de Mellos significance yesterday when
he said his death would be a setback politically for the
UN mission.
There is no doubt that in the aftermath of the Canal Hotel
bombing, the Bush administration will step up its repression against
the Iraqi people. Bush hinted at what was in store when he declared
yesterday: [The] Iraqi people face a challenge, and they
face a choice. The terrorists want to return to the days of the
torture chambers and mass graves. The Iraqi people who want peace
and freedom must reject them and fight terror.
Stripped of its obvious lies, Bushs menacing statement
is a warning to the Iraqi people: either you are with us, or against
us. By recklessly invading and occupying Iraq, the US administration
has turned the country into a quagmire that is producing spiralling
opposition and resistance. Bushs comments are a signal that
the political gangsters in the White House are preparing to escalate
their war of attrition against the Iraqi population.
See Also:
Iraq: No letup in anti-US riots and guerrilla
attacks
[19 August 2003]
Release of Hussein sons
photos: Washington exposes its own barbarism
[25 July 2003]
Shakeup in US occupation as
Iraqi society disintegrates
[14 May 2003]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |