|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Why is the US media blacking out documentary on war crimes
in Afghanistan?
By Kate Randall
21 June 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Massacre in Mazar, a documentary by Irish director Jamie
Doran, was screened last week before select audiences in Europe.
The film documents events following the November 21, 2001 fall
of Konduz, the Talibans last stronghold in northern Afghanistan.
[See: Afghan war documentary charges
US with mass killings]
The film presents powerful testimony from Afghan witnesses
that US troops collaborated in the torture and killings of thousands
of Taliban prisoners near Mazar-i-Sharif. The film, which has
prompted demands for an international commission of inquiry on
war crimes in Afghanistan, received widespread coverage in the
European press, with major stories in the Guardian, Le
Monde, Suddeutsche Zeitung, Die Welt
and other papers.
This major story, however, has received virtually no coverage
in US newspapers or on network or cable television. Aside from
stories on some alternative Internet publications, and a June
16 article on Salon.com, the story has been essentially blacked
out in the US.
A search for news about the documentary in the major dailiesincluding
the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los
Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Boston Globe
and the Miami Herald turned up empty. Web sites for
ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News and CNN have likewise carried nothing
on the film.
Repeated telephone calls by the WSWS to these news sources,
inquiring why they have failed to cover the story, went unanswered.
How is possible that not a single major US media outlet chose
to cover such an important news event? There is no innocent or
journalistic explanation.
This wholesale political censorship cannot be justified on
the basis that Massacre in Mazar or the events it
depictsare not newsworthy. The two screenings
of the documentary in Germany prompted calls by a number of European
parliamentary deputies and human rights advocates for an independent
investigation into the atrocities exposed by the film. Calling
for an inquiry, prominent human rights lawyer Andrew McEntee commented
it was clear there is prima facie evidence of serious war
crimes committed not just under international law, but also under
the laws of the United States itself.
The film includes scenes of the aftermath of the massacre of
hundreds of Taliban fighters who were taken prisoner outside Mazar-i-Sharif,
at the Qala-i-Jangi prison, showing captured troops who were apparently
shot with their hands tied. The filmmaker also interviewed eyewitnesses,
who describe the torture and slaughter of 3,000 prisoners, who
were allegedly driven to a desert area and massacred. These witnesseswho
were not paidhave offered to provide testimony before any
independent investigation into the events.
The film footage is so damning that both the Pentagon and the
US State Department were compelled within days to issue statements
denying the allegations of US complicity in the torture and murder
of POWs, which are powerfully pointed to by the film. If the US
government is so concerned over the implications of what the documentary
exposes, why has the US media chosen not to report on it?
Since September 11, this same print and broadcast media has
consistently toed the Bush administrations propaganda line;
and there has been no shortage of coverage on the Afghan war.
The governments flouting of international law and the Geneva
Conventions in the treatment of Afghan war prisoners at the Guantanamo
Bay naval base in Cuba and proposals for secret military tribunals
have gone virtually unchallenged. Assaults on the democratic rights
of both immigrants and citizensincluding secret detentions
and suppression of protestshave been reported as legitimate
aspects of the governments war on terrorism.
One topic that has received short shrift in the American press
is the civilian death toll in the US air raids in Afghanistan,
which human rights advocates estimate at more than 3,500, not
including the thousands facing death from starvation and displacement.
The well-known motto of the New York Times, All
the news thats fit to print, increasingly masks a
practice by that newspaper and all the media of choosing to print
only that which fits the war propaganda needs of the Pentagon
and the White House.
The refusal of the press to report on the charges of US complicity
in the torture and mass killings in Afghanistan shown in Massacre
in Mazar or even to acknowledge the existence of the
filmserves one purpose: to keep the American people in the
dark about the Bush administrations military actions and
human rights violations.
The medias silence makes it complicit in what are horrific
war crimes. It also provides an even more sinister service to
the Bush administration. Filmmaker Jamie Doran decided to release
a rough cut of his documentary before final editing because he
feared Afghan forces were preparing to destroy evidence of the
mass killings, scattering the remains of the victims. Self-censorship
by the US media only facilitates such a grisly cover-up.
See Also:
Afghan war documentary charges US with
mass killings of POWs
Showings in Europe spark demands for war crimes probe
[17 June 2002]
Interview with Jamie Doran, director
of Massacre at Mazar
[17 June 2002]
New York Times whitewashes US torture
[19 June 2002]
Open-ended US bombing campaign
results in further Afghan casualties
[4 January 2002]
More evidence of US
war crimes in Afghanistan: Taliban POWs suffocated inside cargo
containers
[13 December 2001]
The Geneva Convention
and the US massacre of POWs in Afghanistan
[7 December 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |