|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America
IMF demands new austerity measures in Argentina
By Bill Vann
12 June 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The International Monetary Fund has continued to stall on sending
a mission to Argentina to negotiate new loans, insisting the government
of President Eduardo Duhalde implement still further austerity
measures.
Duhalde and other Argentine officials had confidently predicted
a swift loan agreement with the IMF after his government carried
out a series of steps demanded by the international lending agency.
These included the repeal of two Argentine laws that Western bankers
saw as a threat to their operations in Argentina, as well as an
agreement between the federal government and the provinces to
restrict spending.
One of these statutes, the so-called economic subversion
law, could have been used to prosecute bankers accused of illegal
activities prejudicial to the national economy. Argentine investigators
had begun probing the activities of major transnational financial
institutions like Citibank, which were accused of illegally transferring
truckloads of US dollars out of the country, helping trigger last
months economic collapse.
The second statute struck down was a bankruptcy law that offered
some protection to heavily indebted national enterprises. With
the laws repeal, the door is open to foreign creditors moving
in and taking over assets of bankrupt companies lock, stock and
barrel.
In a series of tense conversations with Argentine finance minister
Roberto Lavagna, however, top IMF officials have made it clear
that they are far from satisfied with the Duhalde governments
actions, and are demanding that he veto the measure repealing
the economic subversion statute and undertake other actions.
The Peronist bloc in the national legislature succeeded in
pushing through the repeal by a razor-thin margin, and the proposed
veto, underscoring once again the Duhalde governments complete
subservience to the IMF and foreign banks, is seen as politically
untenable.
The IMFs objection is that while repealing the law, the
legislature strengthened sections of the penal code dealing with
economic crimes. The IMF claims these strictures would discourage
investment. The foreign banks want a clear-cut guarantee that
they can continue looting the country without fear of legal consequences.
One of those expected to benefit from the laws repeal
is Domingo Cavallo, the former finance minister who was forced
to resign by mass demonstrations and rioting last December. He
was jailed in April on charges of participating in illegal arms
deals with Ecuador and Croatia in the early 1990s.
A judge has ordered Cavallos release, ruling that there
was insufficient evidence to charge him, despite his having signed
orders approving the arms shipments, which were ostensibly going
to Venezuela and Panama.
A Harvard-educated economist who first served as a leading
finance official in the military dictatorship that ruled the country
from 1976 to 1983, Cavallo was associated throughout his career
with policies that subordinated the Argentine economy to the needs
of international finance capital, with disastrous consequences
for the bulk of the population. It was widely expected that he
would face trial on other, more serious charges associated with
the scandal-ridden privatizations of state-owned enterprises in
the 1990s, and alleged insider deals with Argentine and foreign
bankers.
With his release and the repeal of the law, Cavallo is now
seen as virtually immune to prosecution.
The IMF has also questioned the Argentine governments
plan for lifting the so-called corralito, or freeze
on bank accounts, which was imposed six months ago. This measure
left large numbers of middle- and lower-income depositors penniless.
The plan calls for a voluntary conversion of the deposits
into government bonds redeemable in three to ten years. It also
allows for exceptions, including cash pay-outs for persons over
75 and those whose lives and health are at risk if they are unable
to use their funds.
Rejecting any flexibility, the IMF is calling for a mandatory
conversion to long-term bonds for all depositors, warning that
the current proposal could unleash a new round of inflation.
The federal government reached agreements last month with key
provinces to restrict state spending, which the IMF had characterized
as excessive. In the course of discussions with the provinces
on these measures, Duhalde himself admitted that the demands being
made by the IMF could destroy another 500,000 jobs in a country
where the official unemployment rate already hovers around 20
percent.
According to a report issued last month by the National Institute
of Statistics and Census, half of Argentinas 36 million
people are now living below the official poverty line, lacking
sufficient resources to pay for food, shelter and other basic
necessities.
In the hardest hit provinces, the situation is far worse. In
Corrientes province, for example, 90 out of 100 inhabitants are
indigent. In Formosa, the poverty rate is 89.4 percent; in Chaco,
88.8 percent; in Jujuy, 87.7 percent; and in Entre Rios, 86.7
percent.
There are mounting reports of hunger throughout Argentina.
In one of the many shantytowns surrounding the town of Quilmes,
just 20 minutes outside the capital of Buenos Aires, the principal
of the local school told reporters that families were eating rabbits,
rats and frogs to survive. The mayor of the town acknowledged
the problem, insisting that the funds provided by the federal
and provincial governments were not sufficient to provide any
food assistance, including school lunches.
The principal, Diana Barolich, told the press that the children
report daily how their parents search desperately for food. With
the rats, they cut off their heads, and adults try them first
to see if theyre all right to give to the children.
This is occurring in a country that was considered Latin Americas
most prosperous, and ranked among the greatest beef exporters
in the world.
Duhalde and other government officials have bristled at the
IMFs insistence that still another set of conditions must
be negotiated before approving a new loan. Nonetheless, the Peronist
president, who has repeatedly insisted that he has no Plan
B if the country does not submit to IMF demands, is expected
to submit. The agency cut off lending to Argentina last December
after the country defaulted on foreign debt payments.
The IMF has not indicated what type of mission it intends to
send to Argentina. While the Duhalde government had predicted
that a negotiating team would soon arrive in Buenos Aires to hammer
out a new loan agreement, IMF officials have spoken of an exploratory
or technical mission, indicating that any deal will
still require extensive talks and new conditions.
Once talks do get under way, they will center on drafting a
letter of intent, committing the government to a set of economic
and monetary targets that must be met to continue receiving IMF
credits. These will inevitably mean further austerity and deepening
misery for Argentine working people.
Throughout the 1990s, Argentina was touted as a model for IMF
prescriptions, achieving growth rates based on the sell-off of
state enterprises, while policies of strict austerity and dollar-peso
convertibility led to the ruination of the middle class and drove
large sections of the working class into unemployment and poverty.
Both the IMF and the Bush administration appear determined to
continue these policies, while sucking what wealth remains out
of the country.
One sign of concern that the results may be another revolutionary
upheaval came with the recent visit to Buenos Aires by Assistant
Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research Thomas Fingar.
According to one press report, Fingar made a 38-hour
inspection tour to evaluate the state of preparedness of the armed
forces and the police forces in case of a sharpening of social
conflicts in the coming months. He was disturbed, according
to this account, to learn that the federal police had lost electric
power because of the governments failure to pay the bills.
Meanwhile, Washingtons apparent indifference to Argentinas
economic meltdown came under fire at a June 10 meeting organized
by the Organization of American States. Cesar Gaviria, the OEA
secretary general and former president of Colombia, described
the US position as not very constructive, and warned
that continued neglect of the Argentine crisis would prove very
dangerous because the economic breakdown could spread across
Latin America, creating political instability and social upheavals.
If there is not an orderly end to the [Argentine] crisis
the contagion will be enormous in the rest of Latin America,
Gaviria declared.
See Also:
Discussions on the Argentine
crisis
[22 May 2002]
Argentine president bows to
IMF and banks
[27 April 2002]
Malvinas War veterans protest
Argentinas social crisis
[11 April 2002]
Shock therapy for Argentina:
75,000 jobs disappear in one month
[25 March 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |