|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
New York City police crack down on World Economic Forum protests
By Peter Daniels
9 February 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The protests at the recently concluded World Economic Forum
in New York City became the occasion for an unprecedented mobilization
of police power and official attacks on the rights of assembly
and free speech.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond
Kelly claimed afterwards that the five days of meetings and protests
had shown that the new mayor and his administration had ensured
that people had the ability to demonstrate, people had the
ability to say what they thought, and they did it generally without
impinging on others rights.
There would be something comical about this statement, if it
were not so sinister. The protesters were given permits, but faced
restrictions so draconian that no one could join them or hear
their message. They were turned into virtual prisoners, hemmed
in behind barricades or walls of police, with 4,000 cops deployed
against numbers that reached a maximum of about 10,000 on Saturday
afternoon.
As the New York Times acknowledged in its assessment
of the events, the police claimed the streets.... They surrounded
the demonstrators, bracketing marchers on the streets, at one
point with city buses and at another with police motorcycles,
and monitored the protests with television cameras mounted high
about the Waldorf and on a police helicopter.
The police preparations began several months ago. In the week
before the beginning of the forum, police officials held several
threatening news conferences. Police were deployed 38,000-strong
in steady 12-hour shifts, with an additional 700 cops on hand
if needed. The streets near the Waldorf-Astoria hotel were closed
off at 5 a.m. on Wednesday, more than 24 hours before the scheduled
start of activities.
Cops were stationed outside of Starbucks and Gap stores in
midtown Manhattan and some other areas as well, adding to the
atmosphere of an armed camp. The police also announced that they
were invoking an 1845 law banning groups, which they defined as
three or more people, from wearing masks or hoods in public, even
though a Manhattan Criminal Court judge had ruled recently that
the law could not be applied to peaceful rallies.
While paying lip service to free speech rights, the authorities
at the same time made clear their view of the protesters as the
enemy within and sought to use the events of September
11 to attack basic democratic rights. Michael P. OLooney,
the police departments deputy commissioner for public information,
put it this way: This is America. If people want to come
to New York to protest in a peaceful manner, we welcome and respect
their right to do so. But keep in mind that the citizens of this
city have been through a lot in the last five months. We will
not tolerate anyone breaking the law. If they do so, they will
be dealt with swiftly and firmly.
The police quarantine of demonstrators is not a brand new tactic,
and in fact has been increasingly used in the city, even before
the administration of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Never has its use
been more brazen, however. In this case it was accompanied by
a drumbeat of public statements designed to depict the protesters
as alien outsiders. The language of the police official was quite
conscious. By suggesting that people were coming to New
York to protest. he was declaring that no New Yorker could
possibly associate himself with any protest after September 11.
To make it even clearer, the police sent letters to office buildings
and other businesses in midtown instructing office workers not
to associate with the demonstrators!
These measures had the desired effect of discouraging thousands
of people from turning out for the protests. The cops went looking
for trouble among the smaller groups of demonstrators, and manufactured
it when they felt it necessary.
At many of the smaller protests and meetings held over the
five-day period, police outnumbered demonstrators. At the Fashion
Institute of Technology at 27th Street and 7th Avenue in Manhattan,
for instance, about 200 students arrived for a meeting in an indoor
auditorium on Friday evening. They were met by rows of police
officers stretching for two blocks on the sidewalk in front of
the school, along with mounted police officers on horses and a
police helicopter overhead.
Thirty-eight arrests were made on Saturday, about 150 more
on Sunday and several more on Monday, for a total of 201 during
the World Economic Forum. Most of the arrests on Saturday came
after the police, apparently bent on justifying the massive deployment,
waded into a crowd near 59th Street and Fifth Avenue and began
hauling people out, charging them with unlawful assembly and disorderly
conduct. The police commissioner claimed they had received a tip
that some individuals who were carrying plastic shields and masks
were about to attack the police. A lawyer for the
National Lawyers Guild, Leslie Brody, later declared that the
shields were plastic cafeteria trays that were being used as painted
placards.
The longer-term implications of the police operation are suggested
by other recent developments. Just weeks ago, the newly installed
police commissioner announced the creation of two new top positions
in the department, a deputy commissioner for counterterrorism
and a deputy commissioner for intelligence. General Frank Libutti,
a retired Marine Corps general, was named to the first position,
and David Cohen, a veteran of the CIA, was named to the second.
Each man had 35 years experience. Cohens most recent job,
before he retired in 1997, was overseeing the CIAs espionage
operations around the world.
The new appointments are a clear indication that the September
11 attacks are being used to set in motion the revival of police
spying on political dissidents. Police Commissioner Kelly said
the new posts were created in the closest collaboration with the
FBI.
Peaceful protesters at the World Economic Forum were hamstrung
in the name of the fight against terrorism, and the authorities
will seek to use the same methods against working people fighting
unemployment and budget cuts in the immediate future.
The huge police operation against political protest indicates
that the main worry of the political establishment is not the
actions of terrorists, but the likelihood that workers and youth
will take to the streets to protest growing unemployment, the
corruption and criminality symbolized by Enron, and blatant attacks
on democratic rights.
See Also:
German authorities suspend right to demonstrate
outside Munich Security Conference
[6 February 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |