|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Ireland
Northern Ireland: How the US told the IRA to begin decommissioning
By Mike Ingram
31 October 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
An article in last Sundays Observer newspaper
gives a revealing insight into how the commencement of IRA weapons
decommissioning came about.
The intense pressure from the US, which any informed observer
could not but fail to see, is explained at great length. Some
illustrative details could only have come from sources within
the American or British government, or possibly from within Sinn
Fein.
The author, Alan Ruddock, begins his account with the morning
of September 11, the day of the terrorist attack on the World
Trade Centre in New York, as the US special envoy to Ireland,
Richard Haass was preparing for a meeting with Sinn Fein leader
Gerry Adams. Under the heading, How America held the
IRA over a barrel, Ruddock writes:
After a few minutes of talking about inching forward
towards the peace process, Haass finally snapped. If any
American, service personnel or civilian, is killed in Colombia
by the technology the IRA supplied then you can f**k off,
he shouted, finger jabbing towards Adams chest. Dont
tell me you know nothing about whats going on there, we
know everything about it, Ruddock writes.
Haass was referring to the arrest of three alleged IRA men
in Columbia in August, one of whom was Sinn Feins representative
in Cuba, Niall Connolly. After the meeting with Haass, Adams made
the spurious claim that Connollys appointment had been made
without his knowledge or the authorisation of the international
department of Sinn Fein.
In a World Socialist Web Site article of October 25,
we drew attention to American interests in Northern Ireland and
the fact that Sinn Fein has sought to recast itself in the
role of a favoured political representative of American imperialism.
The article by Ruddock says, Adams principal concern
remained the maintenance of warm relations with the American administration
and the preservation of millions of dollars from rich, conservative
Irish-Americans.
Ruddock cites the case of Bill Flynn, one of the pivotal
figures in Irish-American politics. Describing him as a
close confident of Irish nationalists, Ruddock states
that Flynn, as chairman of the Mutual Bank of America, is
a conservative that no government in Washington can ignore.
The Observer states Flynn told the IRA that, after Colombia,
the only way to rescue the partys reputation in the
US capital was for the IRA to disarm.
They listen to me because they know I am a strong supporter
of what they are doing to unite Ireland, Flynn is said to
have told the Observer.
According to the Observer, Flynn is the figurehead
for a group of US businessmen sympathetic to Sinn Fein, who
are simultaneously crucial to fundraising while also pushing for
an end to the military campaign. Last year the party raised more
than $1 million from corporate Irish-American backers and Adams
realised that, such was the gravity of the situation, Sinn Fein
risked having to close its crucial Washington office.
Flynn was no less forthright than Haass in his communiqués
with Adams, which the Observer say were couriered by special
envoys, as both men were too nervous of being bugged to use the
telephone. Flynn told Adams, They (in Washington) are not
going to put up with any more nonsense... After Columbia and then
September 11, the time had come for real politics, and we had
got to decommission.
Niall ODowd, publisher of the New York-based Irish
Voice, told the Observer, I think that the Americans
played an understated but very significant role. And I think that
time will reveal the importance of what they did, especially the
presence of their ambassador at Sinn Feins Ard Fheis a couple
of weeks ago. In that apparent contradiction was a clear pointer
that the US was still involved and engaged, despite Columbia and
the World Trade Centre.
The article claims that, On September 27 at a safe house
in Dundalk, an Irish border town where many IRA men on the run
from the British security forces live, the Provisionals
leadership held an historic meeting.
Pat Doherty, a Sinn Fein MP, proposed that, for the coming
few months, Martin McGuinness should become the IRAs chief
of staff [a position he was rumoured to hold before becoming a
more public figure in Sinn Fein following the 1981 hunger strikes]
putting the pro-decommissioning wing in the driving seat.
Over the next few weeks, the Observer reveals, the Sinn
Fein/IRA leadership held meetings throughout Ireland with key
figures who were persuaded to back decommissioning. However,
the leadership avoided holding an Army Convention
fearing a nationwide gathering of the volunteers would become
a focal point for dissent.
This is the background to the closely choreographed events
leading to the simultaneous announcement by Adams in Belfast and
McGuinness in Washington on October 22, calling on the IRA to
save the peace process. The following day the IRA
announced that it had begun to decommission to save the
peace process and to persuade others of our intentions.
Ruddock says, It was made clear that America had two
big sticks to wieldvisas for Sinn Fein leaders and the right
to fundraise in the US. These would be withdrawn unless there
was decommissioning.
Absent from the article is any assessment of what America gets
in return. To examine this calls into question the democratic
pretences of the Good Friday Agreement and the new political structures
it has brought into being. Far from heralding the control of the
people of the north of Ireland over their own destiny, the Northern
Ireland Assembly brings together Unionist and Republican parties
that do the political bidding of one or another of the British,
American and Irish governments.
For Britain, the peace process was driven primarily by the
fact that its old methods of rule over the north though Unionism
and the Protestant ascendancy were no longer effective. With the
norths economic decline since the 1960s, Britains
public spending on the province increased substantially. While
cross-boarder trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic
of Ireland increased, with the Republic being northern Irelands
number one export market, the south was the main beneficiary.
Britain even saw its own interests in the north decline as Americas
advanced.
For the southern government, the peace process was driven by
the requirements of international trade and investments. The Republic
had benefited at the expense of the north, becoming the prime
European location for transnational corporations, particularly
American. But if this was to be expanded, the armed conflict had
to be ended.
For the US, the stabilisation of the situation in the north
was essential both for existing investment in the south and new
possibilities in the north. With the failure of earlier attempts
to reach a settlement that excluded Sinn Fein, it was evident
that the Republicans must be included within any new political
structures.
Their role as proxy for the US, however, has given them standing
beyond their wildest dreams. Not only can they maintain US funding
for their organisation, but they are now treated as respected
bourgeois politicians. One can only imagine McGuinness self-congratulatory
frame of mind as he was ushered into the State Department to meet
General Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State as what the Observer
calls a small treat for having agreed to disarm. How
better to mark Sinn Feins transition to respectability than
to have the titular head of the IRA shake hands with the man leading
Americas supposed war on terrorism.
See Also:
Northern Ireland: IRA decommissions arms
[25 October 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |