|
WSWS
: Arts Review
: Film
Festivals
An overview of the 12th Human Rights Watch Film Festival in
London
By Paul Mitchell
28 May 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email
The civil liberties organisation Human Rights Watch (HRW) held
its twelfth annual Film Festival in London recently, screening
22 dramas and documentaries. Several, such as Julian Schnabel's
Before Night Falls
have been reviewed on the World Socialist Web Site previously.
The festival provided the opportunity to see the world premiere
of Ken Fero's Injustice, documenting the 30-year struggle
against deaths in police custody in Britain. It also screened
the British premiere of several other films, including Shaya Mercer's
Trade Offa depiction of the World Trade Organisation
meeting in Seattle in 1999.
In all filmswhether they are political or notone
asks certain basic questions: Does the filmmaker approach his
or her subject in a fresh, satisfying and thoughtful way? Is the
film truthful in its reflection of reality? At a human rights
festival screening, with so many openly political films, one is
also obliged to ask in addition: What is the filmmaker's political
perspective? Do we learn any lessons?
My overall impression at the end of the festival was that many
of the films were good technically, and produced by filmmakers
who show an obvious sympathy for the oppressed. Important issues
are tackled. Emotions are arousedfew could be unmoved by
the sight of children scratching a living in the sewers of Romania
(Children Underground) or the courage of the French Resistance
fighters betrayed to the Nazis (Terrorists in Retirement).
However, there seems to be a universal weakness to these filmsthe
flippant or lazy treatment of their historical and social context.
Julian Schnabel, who introduced his own film Before Night Falls
at the gala night, exemplified this. The film deals with the life
of the gay Cuban poet Reinaldo Arenas, his persecution by the
Cuban regime and eventual death in poverty in New York. According
to Schnabel, What I liked was Reinaldo's humour. His sense
of humour kept him alive and keeps Cubans alive ... and in the
US and here I guess.
Humour is an essential ingredient in many films, but in Schnabel's
hand, an opportunity to explore the rich and complex interplay
between Arenas's life and Castro's Cuba is sacrificed to a few
cheap jokes. Are we any the wiser when all we are really told
about the regime is that it is now Cuba with balls,
i.e., another form of Latin machismo?
To portray humanity's problems creatively is only possible
if it is understood that these problems are historically rooted
and are the product of class society. To ignore this tends to
leave the audience with the conclusion that people are just naturally
violent, prejudiced or stupid. The problem is presented purely
as men hating women or a white state hating
black people. A few courageous individuals may try and fight
back, but all that one can do is show some moral outrage and pressure
the powers-that-be to do something.
What is missing is any conception that the working class and
oppressed should be mobilised to advance their own solution to
the problems created by capitalism. To see the only viable solution
to human rights abuse being the intervention by the international
communitywhich usually means the intervention of the
major Western powers or the United Nationsas advocated by
Human Rights Watch and other liberal critics gathered at the film
festival, will most assuredly pave the way for new disasters.
See Also:
From the 12th Human Rights Watch Film
Festival
Trade Off and Pester Power: Radicalism's dead end critique
of globalisation
[28 May 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |