ON THE
WSWS
Donate
to
the WSWS!
News Feed
Contact
the
WSWS
Editorial
Board
New
Today
News
& Analysis
Workers
Struggles
Arts
Review
History
Science
Polemics
Philosophy
Correspondence
Archive
About
WSWS
About
the ICFI
Help
Books
Online
OTHER
LANGUAGES
German
French
Italian
Russian
Polish
Czech
Serbo-Croatian
Spanish
Portuguese
Turkish
Sinhala-
Tamil
Indonesian
LEAFLETS
Download
in
PDF format
|
|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Film
Reviews
False advertising
Americas Sweethearts, directed by Joe Roth, written
by Billy Crystal and Peter Tolan
By J. Cooper
3 August 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Billy Crystal makes me laugh. When Harry Met Sally was
one of the funniest films Ive seen. Enticed by the promise
of a comedy that lambastes Hollywood excesses, produced by and
featuring Crystal, I was anticipating a well-spent mini-fortune
at the local multiplex. I left disappointed, realizing how unlikely
it would be for a truly biting, satirical film about Hollywood
to open in multiple theaters in the most ubiquitous movie theater
chain around.
Perhaps the intent of the producer Crystal and director Joe
Roth was to allow some of Hollywoods biggest stars (Julia
Roberts, Catherine Zeta-Jones, John Cusack and Crystal) to show
us a glimpse of the hypocrisy of their trade, to let us know that
they resent being idolized as stars rather than appreciated for
their abilities in their field. This is a worthy endeavor, but
unfortunately, the humor used to relate the message here is more
slapstick than satire, the story more romance than critique, so
this reviewer, at least, was dissatisfied.
The sweethearts in question, John Cusack as Eddie
Thomas and Catherine Zeta-Jones as Gwen Harrison, are an estranged
movie star couple whose careers have faltered after their off-screen
breakup. Starring together in a string of grade B romance adventures,
the couple had become the hottest item in Hollywood. Their last
picture together, the much anticipated Time Over Time,
is still in the hands of eccentric director Hal Weidemann (Christopher
Walken), who is editing the final cut in the Unibombers
cabin which has been relocated to his estate. The studio needs
the picture to make money, and the stars need the picture to resuscitate
their careers.
After firing his top publicist Lee Phillips (Crystal), the
studio boss (Stanley Tucci) brings Phillips back to preside over
a lavish junket. A veteran schmoozer and manipulator, Phillips
is the only one who can rescue what could be a financial disaster
for the studio. The assembled journalists will be expecting the
new film, but in case the director fails to show up with it, the
publicist is assigned to divert them. Such junketsat which
the media are showered with gifts and attention, presumably in
exchange for favorable reviewsare a common practice in the
American film industry. Phillips is to mastermind a fake reconciliation
of the ex-couple in order to generate box office interest. The
assembled press corps dutifully demonstrate their devotion to
some good, hot gossip.
The film revolves around Eddies torment over being dumped
by Gwen. But the characters are so artificial that it is difficult
to conceive of their even having a real life. Eddie
is a nice guy, so we cant imagine why he is so devoted to
Gwen, a vain and egocentric diva. There is too little with which
to empathize, and the opportunities to generate any strong feelings
for or against the characters and what they represent are frittered
away by director Joe Roth (notably of Revenge of the Nerds).
In the end, Eddie realizes that he has really fallen for Kiki
(Julia Roberts) the awkward, supposedly plain, formerly overweight,
self-abnegating sister and assistant of the glamorous mega-star.
An interesting scene that seems somewhat honest and revealing
takes place near the end of the film, when the eccentric director
arrives at the eleventh hour with his edited work. He has dropped
the film the studio set out to produce and has made the film that
he feels is importanta documentary secretly shot during
the filming of the feature picture, exposing the bitter and hypocritical
relationships that develop behind the scenes. The unauthorized
film is a hit with the press, reinforcing their status as gossip
junkies, and gratifying all involved. Unfortunately, this aspect
of Americas Sweethearts seems less important to the
filmmakers than the romance that develops between Eddie and Kiki.
It is an interesting and complex scene, but is almost lost on
the audience, taking place at the end of a tedious romantic sequence.
I found the characters too shallow and so exaggerated that
they became cartoonish rather than comic. Crude slapstick overcomes
any subtlety (for example, Phillips, the publicist, in attempting
to save Eddie from jumping off a roof, flings open a door, knocking
into Eddie, sending him flying to the edge while the studio head
mumbles jump, jump.). The satirical moment is lost
in the buffoonery. There are endless jokes about penis size, and
the musical soundtrack is almost cloned from Home Alone.
Possibly this is deliberate, intended as a comment on the well-known
blockbuster films, but since Americas Sweethearts
uses some of the same gags, the music just becomes part of the
lower-level humor.
Americas Sweethearts is advertised as a film that
dares to take on Hollywood. It purports to skewer the Hollywood
milieu of prima donna actresses, avaricious studio moguls and
sycophantic reporters. But the weapons are too blunt so no one
is scratched.
Most of the performances are good, and the film has some funny
moments. Alan Arkin, portraying a guru nurturing Eddie back to
mental health at an exclusive retreat, is very funny. As Phillips
whisks Eddie off, Arkin makes sure his luxury automobile will
be delivered the following week. This is one of several excellent
scenes which provide a keen insight into the atmosphere of greed
and duplicity that permeates Hollywoods upper echelon. If
the humor and plot had remained on this level the film would have
succeeded.
A stinging satire about Hollywood would be most welcome and
refreshing, but this is not it. Wag the Dog, which satirized
both Hollywood and Washington, was more successful. This film
tosses limp barbs at show business, but serves instead a very
run-of-the-mill and predictable romantic comedy. The chosen formula
is quite safe: big stars, a happy Hollywood ending, and the passive
acknowledgment of corruption and deception in Hollywood (as though
we never knew).
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |