|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Alcohol deaths reflect desperate conditions in Kenya
By David Rowan
24 November 2000
Use
this version to print
At least 137 people have died in the Kenyan capital of Nairobi
after drinking an alcoholic brew laced with methanol. A further
500 people are in hospitals across the capital, with some in a
serious condition, and there are reports that 20 people have gone
blind.
Methanol is an industrial alcohol used in the manufacture of
dyes and anti-freeze. It is added to the brew, known locally as
chang'aa ("kill me quick") or kumi kumi (ten-ten), to
increase its intoxicating effects. It is a highly poisonous substance
and as little as 30 millilitres is enough to kill a person, with
10 millilitres being enough to cause blindness. Those who died
suffered respiratory paralysis or liver failure.
There are numerous illegal drinking dens scattered around the
slum areas of Nairobi, where the liquor can be bought at a fraction
of the cost of highly taxed beers and spirits. Most of these dens
are run by widows who rely on the revenue to live, and who compete
with each other over who can offer the most powerful brew.
This latest incident is one of a growing number in Kenya. In
August 1998, 85 people died after drinking methanol contaminated
liquor and in 1999, 17 people died. Over the last two years 100
people have been blinded as a result of consuming the drink. There
is growing anger at the indifference shown to the deaths by the
government led since 1978 by Daniel arap Moi and
police complicity in running the drinking dens.
Kenya is currently in the grip of the worst social and economic
crisis in the country's history. For many from the most impoverished
sections of the population, the deadly brew has become an escape
from the daily misery they face.
The country is suffering the worst drought in 40 years. Conditions
are so bad in the countryside that nomadic pastoralists have trekked
into the cities to escape its devastating effects. Their cattle
block the roads as they graze on whatever vegetation they can
find.
But the more fundamental reason for Kenya's crisis is the policies
of the IMF and World Bank. In 1993, under their direction, the
Moi government implemented a structural adjustment programme that
removed import, price and foreign exchange controls. These measurestogether
with years of corruption and the squandering of resources by the
governmenthave led to a total breakdown of the economy and
infrastructure.
It has become impossible to cope with the drought in the North
and Eastern regions of the country. Electricity is rationed to
two hours use per day. Water supplies are only available a few
times a week. Over half the population of 30 million live below
official poverty levels and unemployment is at 50 percent. This
is set to rise as retrenchment takes place throughout the civil
servicewith up to 25,783 jobs to be axed as part of stipulations
laid down in an IMF loan package.
A further 35,348 people are to lose their jobs in the public
sector. Dr Richard Leakey, who was appointed as head of Kenya's
civil service in response to the IMF's diktat, summed up the attitude
of the western powers and Kenya's privileged elite towards the
restructuring when he said, "it is a painful exercise but
it has to go on".
Basic health care provision in Kenya is non-existent and one
in seven of the population is HIV positive. Primary school enrolment
is falling. A recent letter from the Kenyan finance minister to
the IMF highlighted worsening poverty and a general deterioration
in living standards. In drought hit regions 25 percent of children
under five years of age are suffering from malnutrition.
Yet the world financial institutions want to tighten the screws
even further. The Economist magazine described the conditions
attached to a new $198 million loan package granted by the IMF
in August this year as the "toughest ever imposed by the
fund on any government".
The IMF loan package contains 60 separate elements demanding
that the government draw up a daily balance sheet for inspection
by IMF officials and calls for all public officials, except President
Moi himself, to declare their assets. The loan will be paid in
instalments if the IMF is satisfied that the government has met
its terms. Any deviation from them will result in the loan being
stopped. These measures, which even the Economist describe
as "a virtual surrender of the country's national sovereignty",
mean that the IMF will have a vice-like grip over the economy
of Kenya.
The IMF is using Kenya as an example to other African governments
to demonstrate how it now wants to conduct business. This is what
lies behind the smokescreen of "transparency" and all
talk of fighting against corruption.
See also:
Kenya's
President Moi announces economic cutbacks in bid for IMF funding
[6 October 1999]
Questions
mount in Kenya, Tanzania bombings
[13 August 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |