|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Fighting intensifies in the Ethiopia-Eritrea conflict
By Barbara Slaughter and Chris Talbot
25 May 2000
Use
this version to print
For the last two weeks a new round of heavy fighting has been
under way between the famine-stricken African states of Ethiopia
and Eritrea. Ethiopia is pressing ahead with an offensive deep
into Eritrean-held territory and its troops have taken the strategically
important town of Barentu, which lies on the main road running
west from the Eritrean capital, Asmara. Ethiopian forces claim
to have captured the town for strategic reasons and insist they
intend to withdraw later.
There are, however, indications that Ethiopia intends to press
ahead and occupy their smaller neighbour, or at least seize the
port at Assab and thus regain access to the Red Sea.
Fighting between the countries started in 1998, ostensibly
over a disputed area on the border between them. The war continued
in the border region until the present breakthrough by Ethiopia,
with trench warfare on a massive scale. It is estimated that the
number of troops involved totals over half a million. There are
no accurate figures of casualties, but reports suggest that over
50,000 soldiers and civilians have died, a greater number than
in the Boer War of 1899-1902the last war in Africa on such
a scale.
According to the Eritrean government the fighting has uprooted
550,000 people. Sudanese reports said that 4,000 Eritrean refugees
had recently flooded into the eastern Kassala region of Sudan,
in addition to 67,000 refugees already there. UN Secretary General
Kofi Annan reported that 350,000 people in Eritrea needed "immediate
humanitarian assistance." These figures are in addition to
the number of people affected by famine in the south of Ethiopia.
Annan stated that eight million people in Ethiopia were in need
of assistance.
A major factor behind Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi's
military drive into Eritrea is the desire to divert attention
from mounting opposition to his government. For their part, Western
countries have cited the war as an excuse to cut back on desperately
needed food aid.
The present war began as an economic struggle between the two
countries, when Eritrea attempted to use its coastal facilities
to attract trade and investment denied its poorer, landlocked
neighbour. Eritrea became an independent state in 1993, after
Issaias Afwerki, the present president of Eritrea, and Meles Zenawi
fought a protracted civil war against the Soviet-backed Ethiopian
military dictatorship of Mengistu Haile Mariam. The United States
has given both regimes military aid to support rebel movements
in Sudan, but the West has done nothing to develop the economies
of these countries, which are among the world's poorest. Ethiopia
has huge debts to the IMF.
The United Nations imposed a 12-month arms embargo on Ethiopia
and Eritrea, with Russia tabling a competing motion urging more
diplomacy involving the Organisation for African Unity. When the
UN Security Council finally adopted the embargo by a unanimous
vote, Russia and France insisted that it should be reviewed in
a year's time.
The embargo will have little impact in the short term, because
both sides have stockpiled weapons for at least two years, including
high-tech arms. Both sides are said to have spent about $1million
a day since the conflict began in May 1998. It is believed that
much of the military equipment stockpiled was purchased from Russian
and other Eastern European arms manufacturers.
Origins of the war
The war is repeatedly described as "senseless". However
this tragic conflict, and the nationalism which has been stoked
up in these two countries, is entirely explicable when seen within
the context of a century of imperialist intrigue and Stalinist
betrayals. The Ethiopian and Eritrean people face the same dilemma
that confronts Africa as a whole in the aftermath of the Cold
War: either working people and peasants unite in their own economic
and social interests against imperialism, sweeping aside irrational
borders which were created by colonialism a century ago, or the
assorted nationalist cliques, ex-Maoists-turned-free-marketeers
and tribalist warlords who have emerged in the last decade will
drag them into the wars now consuming a large part of the continent.
Increasingly, as witnessed in Sierra Leone, Western governments
will become involved on one side or the other, using humanitarian
rhetoric to regain direct control over Africa's resources.
The Italians carved the coastal principality of Eritrea out
of Ethiopia in the 1880s and 90s, after they failed to take Ethiopia
in the scramble for Africa. Neighbouring Somalia was divided up
between the British, French and Italians, and Djibouti grabbed
by the French. This left only Ethiopia as a semi-feudal independent
state, as the rival European powers struggled for control over
the strategically important Red Sea coast, the Gulf of Aden and
the Arabian Sea. The importance of the region for the Western
powers continues to this day, given the huge amount of oil still
being shipped out of the Middle East.
The divisions and the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia have
their origins in this bloody colonial conquest, rather than in
language or cultural differences. In the 1930s the Italian fascists
under Mussolini waged a brutal war against Ethiopia, using poison
gas and aerial bombardment. They unified Eritrea, Ethiopia and
the Italian part of Somalia into Italian East Africa. During World
War II, Britain took military possession of the region, and its
future became the subject of a dispute between the United States,
Britain, France and the Soviet Union.
US policy in Africa and the Third World in general was to end
direct colonial rule and encourage the local elites to set up
nominally independent nation states, thereby weakening the grip
of their European rivals and containing the wave of working class
and anti-imperialist struggles that emerged after the war. Britain
and France eventually gave way and by the early 1960s most African
countries were granted independence.
Stalinism's role
A treacherous role was played by the Moscow and, later, Peking
Stalinists in this process. At every stage Soviet and Chinese
Stalinist regimes subordinated the interests of the workers and
rural masses of Africa to their manoeuvres with the Western powers.
Even where there were large Communist parties, as in Egypt and
Sudan, they were directed to prop up the local bourgeois nationalist
regimes.
In Ethiopia the interests of the US were eventually upheld
against the British, who were prepared to allow Eritrea to become
a UN trust administered by the Italians, as in neighbouring Somalia.
The US wanted to build up a naval base on the coast, and accordingly
Eritrea was merged with Ethiopia in 1952. With US military aid
the empire of Ethiopian dictator Haile Selassie was propped up
until 1974.
As the Cold War developed, Soviet interest in establishing
military bases in Africa grew. Moscow began supplying the Somali
regime with arms from 1963, which gained them naval access at
Berbera to the Gulf of Aden. The next year war broke out between
Ethiopia and Somalia over the Ogaden region of Ethiopia, whose
population is predominantly Somali. Siad Barre, who seized power
in a military coup in Somalia in 1969, was backed by the Soviet
Union. With Moscow's imprimatur, Barre claimed that his regimeone
of the poorest in the worldwas socialist.
In 1976 the Soviet Stalinists switched to backing the Ethiopian
regimewhich by then was also calling itself socialistand
began using this larger country as a naval base instead. With
a huge amount of Soviet military equipment shipped into Ethiopia,
including aircraft and training programmes, together with 17,000
Cuban troops, the Horn of Africa became the centre of the Cold
War build-up on the continent. Somali forces were driven out of
the Ogaden and Siad Barre gained support from the US, which gave
military backing to his regime in the 1980s and took over the
port at Berbera.
From 1976 onwards the Ethiopian military regime, known as the
Derg, led by Mengistu Haile-Mariam, ruled by brutally suppressing
the population. It was involved in a series of civil wars against
separatist movements of Eritreans and Tigrayans, as well as the
Oromos and Somalis. Soviet backing was never extended beyond military
aid, and the country became even poorer than under Haile Selassie,
plagued by drought and the famine of 1984 and 1985, in which hundreds
of thousands perished.
With the collapse of the USSR, the nationalist movementsthe
Eritrean Peoples Liberation Front (EPLF) and the Tigrayan Peoples
Liberation Front (TPLF)were able to defeat the Ethiopian
regime of Mengistu. The TPLF, based in the northern part of Ethiopia
next to Eritrea, eventually brought together other movements opposing
Mengistu and established the present Ethiopian government under
Meles Zenawi.
The popular revolutionary uprising which overthrew Haile Selassie
in 1974 united working people, intellectuals and peasants against
the regime and its US backers and was politically amorphous. Nationalism
only came to dominate the political opposition after the military
regime, which had immediately begun jailing and executing all
opponents, was courted by the Moscow Stalinists and received their
military backing. Even then both the EPLF and the TPLF employed
socialist phraseology borrowed from Maoism to embellish their
nationalist agenda. Since taking power both movements have abandoned
their verbal allegiance to socialism, supporting free market economics
and vying for support from Western governments.
See Also:
Aid withheld as famine grips
Horn of Africa
[19 April 2000]
Ethiopia
and Eritrea
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |