|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America
State Department documents confirm
US hypocrisy on human rights
The case of Colombia
Part 4 of a series by Peter Stavropoulos
18 September 1999
Use
this version to print
The Clinton administration justified its military onslaught
against the people of Serbia with the claim that the massive bombing
was motivated by concern over the violation of human rights in
Kosovo. The State Department and the White House, backed by the
American media, charged that the government of Yugoslav President
Slobodan Milosevic was engaged in a Nazi-like campaign of ethnic
cleansing against the Albanian majority in Kosovo.
The claim of humanitarian concern has been undermined by
the events which have ensued in Kosovo since the Yugoslav surrender.
Subsequent investigation has shown that Serb atrocities against
the Albanians, while they did take place, were grossly exaggerated
in order to provide a suitable pretext for war. Meanwhile the
Albanian KLA has launched its own equally brutal campaign of ethnic
cleansing against the Serb minority, which has been largely expelled
from Kosovo.
The claim of humanitarianism has been refuted from another
sourcein documents released by the American government itself,
in the annual State Department review of human rights violations
worldwide. In lengthy, country-by-country reports, the same agency
which spearheaded the propaganda barrage against Yugoslavia details
charges mass repression against many of the closest American allies.
These reports demonstrate irrefutably, out of its own mouth,
that the American government is a well-informed, knowing collaborator
in some of the worst atrocities being perpetrated against oppressed
peoples around the world, arming and financing governments which
engage in ethnic cleansing, the forced removal of the population
of villages and entire regions, and mass murder.
We have selected four of these reports for careful review.
All four countriesTurkey, Sri Lanka, Israel and Colombiahave
governments considered friendly by Washington. As a result there
will be no bombs dropped on their capital cities and no magazine
covers with mug shots of their presidents, although the crimes
committed by these regimes put Milosevic in the shade.
The following segment on Colombia is the final part in the
series.
Colombia is strategically situated as the only South American
country with coastlines on both the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean
Sea. The former Spanish colony has a population of 39 million
and is nearly three times the size of Montana. The country is
rich in natural resources such as petroleum (3.5 percent of the
world's total), natural gas, iron ore, nickel, gold, copper and
emeralds. It has 14 percent of the world's coal reserves.
Vast sections of these rich mineral resources are under the
control of large multinationals such as Shell, Gulf, British Petroleum,
Chevron, PetroCanada, Amoco and Occidental Petroleum. Any discovery
on their behalf automatically gives the multinationals one-half
ownership, while the Colombian government is restricted to purchasing
the other half from them.
Colombia has been wracked by civil war over the last 40 years,
with various governments fighting against thousands of guerrillas
and, in doing so, financing and arming up to 500 right-wing paramilitary
groups. Government and paramilitary forces openly collaborate
and are indicted by the State Department report for responsibility
in a widespread campaign of terror organized from the highest
offices of the political, military and judicial establishments
of Colombia. The "Colombia Country Report on Human Rights
Practices for 1998," was issued February 26, 1999 by the
department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. The
report says:
The Government continued to face a serious challenge
to its control over the national territory, as long standing and
widespread internal armed conflict and rampant violenceboth
criminal and politicalpersisted. The principal participants
were government security forces, paramilitary groups, guerrillas,
and narcotics traffickers.
In some locations on a few occasions the army attacked
and captured members of illegal paramilitary groups; in others
members of the security forces collaborated with such groups,
and several general officers were under investigation during the
year for arming and sharing intelligence with such groups. Although
their record showed some improvement, the armed forces and the
police committed numerous, serious violations of human rights
throughout the year.
The Government's human rights record remained poor; there
was some improvement in several areas, but serious problems remain.
Government forces continued to commit numerous, serious abuses,
including extrajudicial killings, but at a level below that of
previous years. The authorities rarely brought officers of the
security forces and the police charged with human rights offenses
to justice.
Mass killings, torture and forced displacements
The scale of the killing in Colombia dwarfs that in Kosovo,
while the forced removal of peoplealmost entirely imposed
by the government, not the guerrillasis roughly equivalent.
But there has been no government and press campaign to portray
President Andres Pastrana as the "Hitler of the Andes."
On the contrary, the American media has begun to give greater
attention to Colombia as a country where the American military
might have to intervene on the side of the government, not the
insurgents. The State Department report continues:
The National Institute for Forensic Medicine stated in
a preliminary report that at least 19,665 murders occurred during
the year ... a final homicide rate of 60 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants.
The police and the Prosecutor General's office have insufficient
resources to investigate most killings adequately. In 1996 the
Superior Council of the Judiciary reported that 74 percent of
all crimes go unreported, and between 97 and 98 percent of all
crimes go unpunished. The 1996 Government Commission on Public
Spending placed the impunity rate for all crimes at 99.5 percent.
The cycle of violence involving government forces, paramilitary
groups, and guerrillas resulted in the deaths of 2,000 to 3,000
persons; according to one non governmental organization, during
the first 9 months of the year in cases in which the perpetrator
was identified credibly, government forces committed at least
21 extrajudicial killings in the context of the internal conflict
and in other actions, paramilitary groups committed at least 573,
and guerrillas at least 160. Violence and instability in rural
areas displaced 300,000 civilians from their homes during the
year, more than any other similar period during the past decade.
The total number of internally displaced citizens during 1995-98
probably exceeded 750,000.
The government of Pastrana's predecessor, Ernesto Samper, presided
over the bulk of the forced displacements, while taking little
responsibility for the subsequent suffering. According to the
State Department, a Colombian government agency estimated that
some 65 percent of these displacements became permanent:
"The Samper Government's response to the needs of the
displaced population was inadequate, and by its own estimate reached
only 10 percent of the displaced population. Most displaced citizens
receiving government assistance received it for only 90 days.
Conditions at the Government's two camps for displaced persons,
at Pavarando and Turbo, were poor and unhygienic; health care
is poor and there are few educational or employment opportunities....
Thousands of displaced persons also fled to Panama, Ecuador, and
Venezuela, where they usually were denied refugee status, treated
as illegal immigrants, and denied protection or assistance."
The role of the military
Colombia is the third largest foreign recipient of US military
aid, after Israel and Egypt, despite a record of human rights
violations by its military forces which even the State Department
concedes is abysmal:
The military judiciary convicted 76 security force members,
including 3 police officers and 1 army officer, during the year,
including some for human rights violations. Those courts convicted
29 of homicide, 41 of assault, 4 of deprivation of liberty, 1
of abuse of authority, and 1 of rape.
However, the Ministry of Defense reported neither the
nature of sentences in the 76 cases nor the circumstances of the
crimes.... The Penal Code authorizes restriction to base as an
acceptable substitute for imprisonment when military jails or
prisons are unavailable."
The Colombian government has admitted its role in only a handful
of the thousands of deaths perpetrated by soldiers and right-wing
paramilitary squads:
In July just before leaving office, President Samper
publicly and formally recognized state responsibility for the
deaths of some 50 citizens in 3 massacres and 2 extrajudicial
killings that occurred during 1991-93.... Despite the President's
statement, military courts had already absolved those army and
police personnel investigated of any responsibility for the killings....
The other 4 cases for which President Samper accepted
state responsibility are the December 1991 massacre of 20 Paez
Indians by the police at Caloto, Cauca; the November 1992 killing
of 10 persons in Medellin's Villatina neighborhood by police officers;
the April 1992 murders of Faride Herrera and Oscar Ivan Andrade
by members of the army and the police; and the June 1993 killing
of a youth, Roison Mora Rubiano, by members of the army.
"On March 31, an anonymous civil court judge sentenced
five police and army officers.... The officers had been charged
with terrorism and complicity in the November 1988 paramilitary
massacre of a group of 49 people and the injury of 56 others.
Colombian military personnel have received training in the
United States or in US military schools in Panama. The United
States has provided equipment to the Colombian military through
the military assistance program and foreign military sales. During
the period 1988-95, the United States provided approximately $691
million in assistance to Colombia. In 1996, US assistance totaled
$73.9 million.
The paramilitary death squads
It is estimated that up to 54 percent of forced displacement
of civilians is due to the terror campaigns of paramilitary forces
who alongside the Colombian military are responsible for social
genocide. The State Department report gives details:
Vigilante and paramilitary groups that engaged in 'social
cleansing'the killing of street children, prostitutes, homosexuals,
and others deemed socially undesirablecontinued to be a
serious problem.... Throughout the country, paramilitary groups
murdered, tortured, and threatened civilians suspected of sympathizing
with guerrillas in an orchestrated campaign to terrorize them
into fleeing their homes, thereby depriving guerrillas of civilian
support....
The paramilitary groups centered their actions in selective
killings, intimidation, and the forced displacement of persons
not directly involved in the hostilities. They targeted teachers,
labor leaders, community activists, mayors, town council members,
and peasants whom they accused of supporting the leftist guerrillas.
Credible allegations of cooperation with paramilitary
groups, including instances of both silent support and direct
collaboration by members of the armed forces, in particular the
army, continued. There were tacit arrangements between local military
commanders and paramilitary groups in some regions, and paramilitary
groups operated freely in some areas that were under military
control. The authorities assigned two senior officers with links
to paramilitary groups to top leadership positions.
Paramilitary groups continued to target and kill judicial
and criminal investigative employees for their efforts to enforce
the rule of law ... the number of killings of Prosecutor General's
office employees grew during the last 2 years to 30; in the Medellin
office alone 7 were killed between January and June.... CINEP
reported that paramilitary groups were responsible for 573 extrajudicial
killings.
On November 7, the authorities found the skeletons of
25 children in a common grave near Pereira, Risaralda department.
Forensics experts concluded that the children had been murdered.
Some observers speculated that the killings may have been the
result of a social cleansing campaign."
Torture and judicial frame-up
Like most countries, Colombia's constitution and laws prohibit
torture. But these strictures have no effect on the conduct of
the security forces when someone has the misfortune to fall into
their hands as a "suspected" guerrilla or supporter
of the guerrillas. The State Department report concedes: reports
of incidents of police and military torture or mistreatment of
detainees continued. Of the 140 investigations of security force
members completed by members of the human rights unit of the Attorney
General's office between January and July, 108 investigations
involved allegations of torture committed in previous years.
The Office of the Attorney General received 119 complaints
of torture during the year; they reported investigating 462 cases
of torture committed by the police, DAS, army, prison officials,
and other agents of the State between June 1995 to October 1996.
A Colombian government investigation attributed 41 of 42 cases
of murder to paramilitary groups. An independent non-governmental
organization, CPDH, "reported that 5,429 persons were threatened
with murder between January and June. The NGO reported that nearly
half were public school teachers.
Such is the barbaric state of the country's prison system that
the La Modelo prison had the highest incidence of homicide of
any neighborhood in Bogota, the country's capital.
There were 150 murders in the country's 168 prisons during the
year. According to the US State Department:
Prison conditions are generally harsh.... Severe overcrowding,
and dangerous sanitary and health conditions remained serious
problems. In December 1997, a visiting IACHR mission declared
that the living conditions in Bogota's La Picota prison constituted
'cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of the inmates.' According
to the Committee for Solidarity with Political Prisoners, a majority
of prisoners' food was provided by outside, private sources. The
nation's 168 prisons and jails held nearly 45,000 inmates at year's
end, 59 percent more than their planned capacity. In a number
of the nation's largest prisons, the overcrowding was severe.
Medellin's Bellavista prison, the nation's largest, was built
to house 1,700 inmates; in December 1997 it housed more than 5,100
inmates. Bogota's La Modelo prison and the Palmira prison outside
Cali both held more than 250 percent of their designed capacity.
The judicial system not only protects the murderous activities
of military and paramilitary forces, it is also weighed down by
a civilian judiciary system that has a backlog of a staggering
3.5 million cases and 150,000 outstanding arrest warrants:
The use of 'faceless' prosecutors, judges, and witnesses,
under cover of anonymity for security reasons, continued in cases
involving kidnapping, extortion, narcotics trafficking, terrorism,
and in several hundred high profile cases involving human rights
violations. Human rights groups accuse these courts of violating
fundamental rights of due process, including the right to a public
trial."
Trials involving charges against soldiers and officers are
particularly liable to manipulation:
The Superior Judicial Council assigned most cases involving
high-level military personnel to the military courts, where convictions
in human rights-related cases were the rare exception.... On October
1, the Superior Judicial Council determined that Brigadier General
Fernando Millan Perez's alleged organization of a paramilitary
group constituted an act of service and therefore turned General
Millan's case over to the military judiciary for prosecution....
In cases where military officers were tried, convicted,
and sentenced for human rights violations, they generally did
not serve out prison terms and in some cases remained on active
military duty.
Freedom of speech and human rights
The Colombian authorities systematically intimidate and murder
those in the media and human right's organizations that threaten
to carry out any exposition of the government's abuse of civilians:
Both Colombian and international journalists typically
work in an atmosphere of threats and intimidation. Fearing for
their safety, journalists often refrain from publishing or airing
stories counter to the interests of paramilitary groups, guerrillas,
or narcotics traffickers. Unknown assailants murdered at least
13 journalists during the year, although not all the murders apparently
were related to the journalists' work.... According to Pais Libre,
16 journalists were kidnapped during the year. Most of the incidents
appeared to have been related to journalists' work and aimed at
intimidation."
The human rights community came under intense pressure
during the year. Human Rights Watch/Americas cited a 'shocking
record' of killings of human rights defenders. Human rights monitors
were subject to a systematic campaign of intimidation, harassment,
and violence. Human Rights Watch also reported that 6 human rights
defenders were killed in the first 10 months of the Year ... in
addition, many human rights workers fled the country for their
own safety."
Trade unions and political parties
The brutal measures carried out by the Colombian military and
the death squads are in the main directed against the working
class and peasantry. The violent suppression of any form of opposition
to the inhuman conditions faced by most is to ensure that the
country's vast mineral resourses are freely exploited by the large
landowners and multinational firms. The General Secretary of the
Federation of Petroleum Workers, Pedro Galindo, claims that the
country's largest private army, 5,000 forces, operates in the
oil field controlled by the Texas Petroleum Company. The private
army was trained by ex-officials of the Israeli and British armies
who were contracted by a vice minister in the government. The
narco-traffickers give them logistical help, and the government
army gives the private army its weaponsall this occurs in
a private field of Texaco.
In May the International Labor Organization (ILO) expressed
its serious concern at allegations of murders, forced disappearances,
death threats, and other acts of violence against trade union
officials and members. The ILO documented more than 300 murders
of trade unionists during 1995-98. The ILO harshly criticized
the Government for failing, since November 1996, to provide it
with information on a single case of detention, trial, and conviction
of anyone responsible for the murder of unionists ... more than
10 percent of all victims of politically motivated homicides during
the year were public school teachers.
The Government has not addressed other ILO criticisms
of the Labor Code. In 1993 the ILO had complained about the following
provisions of the law: the requirement that government officials
be present at assemblies convened to vote on a strike call; the
legality of firing union organizers from jobs in their trades
once 6 months have passed following a strike or dispute ... the
prohibition of strikes in a wide range of public services that
are not necessarily essential; various restrictions on the right
to strike; the power of the Minister of Labor and the President
to intervene in disputes through compulsory arbitration when a
strike is declared illegal; and the power to dismiss trade union
officers involved in an unlawful strike.
Labor leaders throughout the country continued to be
targets of attacks by paramilitary groups, guerrillas, narcotics
traffickers, and their own union rivals.... In December the International
Confederation of Free Trade Unions announced in Geneva that at
least 50 union members had been killed because of their union
activities during 1998.
The State Department's human rights report on Colombia is an
indictment of successive governments that have utilized the ongoing
civil war to carry out a campaign of murder and terror against
the most impoverished sections of society. It is also an indictment
of successive American governments which have served as paymasters,
armorers and advisers to the rulers in Bogota.
In August 1997 President Clinton waived a 20-year ban on selling
advanced weapons systems to Latin American countries, a restriction
imposed by the Carter administration on the grounds of the rampant
human rights violations in the region, where military dictatorshipsinstalled
with US backingruled in nearly every country. Clinton claimed
that the restoration of civilian rule in the hemisphere meant
an end to human rights abuses.
This decision has allowed the US to sell or license arms sales
worth $440 million to the Colombian government, which uses these
weapons against the civilian population in order to protect the
strategic economic and political interests of the country's ruling
elite and of the large transnational firms that dominate the economy.
See Also:
US hypocrisy on human rights: The case
of Israel
[17 September 1999]
US hypocrisy on human rights
The case of Sri Lanka
[15 September 1999]
State Department documents confirm
US hypocrisy on human rights
The case of Turkey
[14 September 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |