|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Spotlight on Australian justice
Aboriginal teenagers jailed, prison suicides treble
By Cheryl McDermid
21 September 1999
Use
this version to print
17-year-old jailed for stealing biscuits
A 17-year-old Aboriginal boy was sentenced last month to one
year's jail for stealing a $3.50 packet of biscuits in Australia's
Northern Territory. He will be incarcerated under laws passed
in 1998 stipulating mandatory prison sentences for all adult property
offences, ranging from two weeks' jail for a first offence to
one year for the third offence.
Under Northern Territory law, 17-year-olds are classified as
adults. Juveniles aged either 15 or 16 years are given warnings
for a first offence and a minimum one-month term in an institution
for a second offence.
Aboriginal youth are convicted of a disproportionately high
number of minor property offences, and they are six to eight times
more likely to be jailed than others. So many Aborigines have
been jailed under the new laws that many are being transported
to Alice Springs, some 1,500 kilometres away. Jails in Darwin,
the Northern Territory's capital, are full.
One Aboriginal youth was jailed for stealing a $2.50 cigarette
lighter and four others for the theft of $1.60 worth of petrol.
A 29-year-old homeless Aborigine was sentenced to a year in prison
for stealing a towel; a 27-year-old mother was jailed for two
weeks for stealing a $2.50 can of beer; and a 27-year-old non-Aboriginal
teacher was imprisoned for two weeks for pouring water over a
shop cash register after complaining about a hot dog she had been
served.
Magistrate identifies 16-year-old convicted of drink
driving
A magistrate in the rural city of Wagga Wagga allowed the publication
of the name and photograph of a 16-year-old Year 11 student whom
the magistrate convicted of drink driving.
Under New South Wales state criminal law, no-one can publish
the identity of juvenile offenders (aged 10-17), their families
or their convictions. This is meant to facilitate the rehabilitation
of young people, and ensure that childhood offences do not affect
them throughout their lives. However, this protection only pertains
to breaches of the Crimes Act. In cases covered by the Traffic
Act, the young person does not appear before a Children's Court
but is dealt with as an adult.
Magistrate Andy O'Donaghoe declared that if people were old
enough to have permits or driving licences, they would be dealt
with in the Local Court for traffic matters. "I presume (the
names of) juveniles can be reported," he said.
The boy's lawyer intends to take the matter to the state Labor
government's Attorney General, Jeff Shaw. But Shaw's spokesman
commented: "Even though he was charged with the criminal
offence of drink driving, it comes under the Traffic Act so he
is treated in open court and can be named."
The naming of this young person is part of a wider agenda.
The Murdoch-owned newspaper that reported the case has called
for a discussion on whether juvenile offenders should be identified
generally. Successive state governments, both Liberal and Labor,
have raised the issue of overturning the ban on naming teenagers
convicted of criminal offences.
Prison suicides treble since 1980
A national study by the Australian Institute of Criminology
has revealed that suicide is the leading cause of death in Australia's
correctional institutions, increasing by 240 percent between 1980
and 1998. Ten prisoners committed suicide in 1980, while last
year 34 prison suicides were recorded.
Research analyst Vicky Dalton stated: "While prison populations
have doubled in this period, suicides have tripled, far outstripping
the community suicide rate." Suicides represented 46 percent
of all prison deaths. Half of the suicide deaths occurred while
prisoners were on remand, waiting for trial.
Of the prisoners who committed suicide, 96.5 percent were male
and 14.4 percent were Aborigines. While the average age was 29,
some 80 percent were teenagersaged 17 to 19. Three states
accounted for 80 percent of prison suicides, with 11 in New South
Wales, 10 in Western Australia and 6 in Victoria.
Police killing of Roni Levi to be investigated
The New South Wales Police Integrity Commission has been forced
to launch an inquiry after receiving information that the two
policemen who shot and killed 33-year-old Roni Levi on Sydney's
Bondi Beach two years ago were present at early morning drug parties
a few hours prior to his death. The Commission will also examine
allegations of "corruption or misconduct" by police
in the coronial investigation.
Levi's wife, Melinda Dundas, discovered the new evidence. She
lodged a detailed submission through the Newcastle Legal Centre,
uncovering alleged flaws in the police investigation.
On Sunday June 28, 1997, Levi ran onto Sydney's Bondi Beach
before 7am, holding a knife. Friends told police he was suicidal.
In a disturbed mental state, he had sought help from St Vincents
Hospital the previous night, but had left before seeing a doctor.
A tourist's photograph showed him on a deserted beach with
his back to the sea, surrounded by six police officers pointing
revolvers at him. After a 30-minute stand-off, two policemen,
Rodney Podesta and Anthony DiLorenzo, fired two shots each into
Levi, witnessed by dozens of horrified people on the promenade.
It was the third police shooting in the state of New South
Wales in eight weeks. Between 1990 and 1996, police killed 36
people in Australia, 19 of them in the neighbouring state of Victoria.
Police chiefs immediately endorsed Levi's shooting without
waiting for any inquiry. Bondi patrol commander Chief Inspector
Dick Baker declared the killing to be perfectly justified.
He claimed that the police had feared for their lives
because Levi had lunged toward them with a knife. Baker said the
two officers had just completed a mandatory training program on
the use of firearms, where they were taught to fire in volleys
of two, aimed at the immediate centre of the person's body
massthat is, the chest.
Podesta and DiLorenzo were not asked for urine samples to enable
drug testing, nor were they interviewed separately. Yet the Director
of Public Prosecutions decided last year not to lay charges against
them, on the basis that they were acting in self-defence.
There is now evidence that both policemen were linked to drug
dealers in the Bondi area. Police Internal Affairs arrested DiLorenzo
during a drug raid, while Podesta has since been arrested and
charged with drug offences.
See Also:
Australian laws violate children's rights
[7 September 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |