|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America : Chile
Washington and the Pinochet coup in Chile
Declassified documents confirm US role in 1973 death of Charles
Horman
By Bill Vann
26 October 1999
Use
this version to print
More than a quarter century after the execution in Chile of
Charles Horman, an American freelance journalist, Washington has
released a document admitting that US intelligence agents played
a role in his death.
The Horman case was made famous by the Hollywood movie Missing.
Directed by Constantino Costa Gavras, the film dramatized the
struggle of Charles Horman's family to uncover the truth about
his murder and the collaboration of US officials with the Chilean
military dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet in carrying
it out.
The State Department memo, dated August 25, 1976, was declassified
just over two weeks ago (October 8), together with 1,100 other
documents released by various US agencies. These papers dealt
primarily with the years leading up to the military coup that
brought Pinochet to power in September 1973. An initial set of
5,800 previously classified documents, made public last June 30,
concerned the first five years of the dictatorship, when tens
of thousands of Chilean workers, students and political oppositionists
were imprisoned, tortured and executed.
Charles Horman was one of the victims of the Pinochet coup.
On September 17, 1973, six days after the US-backed military takeover,
Horman was seized by Chilean soldiers and taken to the National
Stadium in Santiago, which had been turned by the military into
a make-shift concentration camp. There prisoners were interrogated,
tortured and executed. One month later, Horman's body was found
in a morgue in the Chilean capital. A second American journalist,
Frank Terrugi, was killed in the same fashion.
Written by three State Department functionariesRudy Fimbres,
R.S. Driscoll and W.V. Robertsonand addressed to Harry Schlaudeman,
a high-ranking official in the department's Latin American divisionthe
August 1976 document described the Horman case as "bothersome,"
given reports in the press and Congressional investigations charging
that the affair involved "negligence on our part, or worse,
complicity in Horman's death." The memo was written while
Henry Kissinger was still Secretary of State.
The State Department, the memo declared, had the responsibility
to "categorically refute such innuendoes in defense of US
officials." It went on, however, to lay out the case that
these "innuendoes" were well founded.
The three State Department officials said they had evidence
that "The GOC [Government of Chile] sought Horman and felt
threatened enough to order his immediate execution. The GOC might
have believed this American could be killed without negative fall-out
from the USG [US Government]."
The report went on to declare that circumstantial evidence
indicated "US intelligence may have played an unfortunate
part in Horman's death. At best it was limited to providing or
confirming information that helped motivate his murder by the
GOC. At worst, US intelligence was aware the GOC saw Horman in
a rather serious light and US officials did nothing to discourage
the logical outcome of GOC paranoia."
What the document does not mention is that the US military
and the Central Intelligence Agency had their own reasons not
only to feed the Chilean dictatorship's "paranoia,"
but also to take a direct role in sanctioning the execution. Horman
spent the day of the military uprising and several days thereafter
in the resort town of Viña del Mar, near the port of Valparaiso,
which was a key base for both the Chilean coup plotters and US
military and intelligence personnel who were supporting them.
While there, he spoke with several US operatives and took careful
notes documenting the US role in overthrowing the elected government
of President Salvador Allende.
After the release of the State Department memo, Horman's widow,
Joyce, described it as "close to a smoking pistol."
The same document had been released to the Horman family more
than 20 years ago. But the paragraphs cited above were blacked
out by the State Department. It took nearly two decades for Washington
to reveal what had been hidden in the 28 lines blacked out by
government censors.
Still, the Clinton administration's "Chile Declassification
Project," touted by the president as an effort to "shed
light on human rights abuses, terrorism and other acts of political
violence" under Pinochet, has amounted to an exercise in
hypocrisy. Motivated by Washington's desire to distance itself
from its former ally after the ex-dictator's arrest in London
and efforts to extradite him to Spain, the declassification has
hidden more than it has revealed.
The Horman document released October 8 came from the State
Department, as have the vast bulk of the material that has been
declassified. In it, the State Department officials themselves
express skepticism about the account given by the CIA of its relations
with key Chilean figures involved in Horman's case.
While this section of the document still has sections deleted
for reasons of "national security," it declares that
the agency's account "needs further illumination no matter
CIA disclaimers." It goes on to declare that the authors
find it hard to believe "that the Chileans did not check
with [name deleted] regarding two detained Americans ... lack
of candor with us on other matters only heightens our suspicions."
But where are the CIA documents, both those shared with the
State Department at the time and those whose concealment prompted
such suspicions? They remain classified, as do documents from
the Pentagon which would have recounted contacts between US military
officers and Charles Horman in Viña del Mar.
In the first batch of declassified material, 5,000 of the 5,800
documents came from the State Department, while the CIA released
only 500. Out of some 25,000 pages of reports, memos and cables
that have been made public thus far, not a single one provides
any information on the part played by the CIA, the Pentagon or
other US agencies in the Chilean coup itself and the bloody repression
which followed.
There is no dispute that these documents exist. Daily cables
went back and forth between Washington and Santiago as the CIA
and the Nixon government followed the progress of "Track
II," as the planned coup was known in intelligence circles.
These documents have been referred to repeatedly in congressional
investigations and access to them has been repeatedly denied in
various Freedom of Information requests.
One of the recently released State Department documents gives
an indication of the scale of US collaboration with Pinochet's
preparations. It establishes that US military aid was raised dramatically
between the coming to power of Allende in 1970, when it amounted
to $800,000, to $10.9 million in 1972, as the coup plans were
elaborated. Even as Nixon and Kissinger vilified the Allende government,
they poured vast resources into the instrument they would use
to overthrow it, the Chilean military.
Further documents withheld by the CIA and other US intelligence
agencies concern the 1976 car bomb assassination of Orlando Letelier,
a former Chilean minister and opponent of the dictatorship, together
with his American aide, Ronni Moffitt, in Washington, DC. American
officials have made the improbable claim that these documents
must remain secret because they are material to the investigation
of Pinochet's crimes.
According to Peter Kornbluh, a senior analyst at the National
Security Archive, the CIA has rejected any review of documents
emanating from its Directorate of Operations, the covert arm that
earned the agency the nickname Murder Inc., on the grounds that
the US government has never officially acknowledged carrying out
covert operations in Chile. Similarly, the agency has taken the
position that planning and policy documents are not covered by
Clinton's declassification order.
This guarding of Washington's dirty secrets relating to Chile
is motivated in part by the fact that former and present US officials
who played a role as criminal as that of Pinochet himself are
still alive. They, like the ex-dictator, could conceivably be
called to account.
Men like ex-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and the CIA's
former coup master in Latin America, General Vernon Walters, are
among them, as are many lesser-known functionaries of US intelligence
and the Pentagon.
Even more important, "national security interests"
are at stake in keeping these documents secret because, 25 years
after the Chilean coup, US imperialism is still prepared to use
the methods employed by Pinochet and his American backers in defending
the interests of the US banks and multinationals and suppressing
the struggles of the working class all over the world.
See Also:
The Pinochet
coup and the death of Charles Horman
[23 October 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |