|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : The
Brutal Society
Illinois prosecutors and police acquitted despite evidence
they framed defendant
By Alden Long
16 June 1999
Use
this version to print
A DuPage County, Illinois prosecutor and four sheriff's officers
were acquitted by a county judge and jury June 4 of charges that
they conspired to frame up and convict Rolando Cruz for murder,
rape and kidnapping.
If they had been convicted, it would have marked the first
time in American history that a prosecutor was convicted of felony
charges for intentionally withholding exculpatory evidence or
knowingly using false evidence to incriminate a defendant. However,
as has happened in every previous case where prosecutors have
been brought to trial on these charges, the so-called DuPage 7
were not convicted.
In the weeks leading up to the trial, the Chicago Tribune
ran a series of articles that demonstrated how widespread prosecutorial
abuse is in the US. In its article The verdict: Dishonor
the newspaper reported, Since a 1963 US Supreme Court ruling
designed to curb misconduct by prosecutors, at least 381 defendants
nationally have had a homicide conviction thrown out because prosecutors
concealed evidence suggesting innocence or presented evidence
they knew to be false. Of all the ways that prosecutors can cheat,
those two are considered the worst by the courts. And that number
represents only a fraction of how often such cheating occurs.
The US Supreme Court has declared such misconduct by
prosecutors to be so reprehensible that it warrants criminal charges
and disbarment. But not one of those prosecutors was convicted
of a crime. Not one was barred from practicing law. Instead, many
saw their careers advance, becoming judges or district attorneys.
One became a Congressman.
Former DuPage County Prosecutors Thomas Knight, Patrick King
and Robert Kilander, and Sheriff's Detectives Dennis Kurzawa,
Thomas Vosburgh, Lt. James Montesano and Lt. Robert Winkler, were
charged with 47 criminal counts, including perjury, and conspiracy
to obstruct justice, commit official misconduct and frame up a
defendant.
The case involved the prosecution and conviction of Rolando
Cruz for the 1983 kidnap, rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine
Nicarico in DuPage County, an affluent suburb of Chicago. Cruz
was tried three times in the decade from 1985 to 1995, and he
was convicted twice. He spent a decade on death row in Illinois
before he was finally acquitted in his third trial.
Cruz was first tried along with Alex Hernandez and Steve Buckley.
On February 22, 1985 a jury convicted Cruz and Hernandez, but
deadlocked over the guilt of Buckley. Cruz and Hernandez were
sentenced to death, and Buckley's case was held over for retrial.
On November 13, 1985, Brian Dugan, (who had pled guilty to
two other rape-murders, including one where the victim was seven
years old, and was facing his sentencing hearing) authorized his
attorney to tell prosecutors that he kidnapped, raped and killed
Jeanine Nicarico. Dugan offered to confess to the murder if prosecutors
agreed not to seek the death penalty.
Dugan's attorney turned his notes over to DuPage prosecutors
Patrick King and Robert Kilander, but the pair illegally withheld
this exculpatory evidence from the attorneys defending Cruz, Hernandez
and Buckley.
By the beginning of 1992 Cruz had been retried, convicted and
sentenced to death for a second time, and Alex Hernandez had been
retried, convicted and sentenced to 80 years in his third trial.
Meanwhile DNA tests had specifically linked Dugan to the crime;
had specifically excluded Hernandez, and were inconclusive in
regard to Cruz.
Cruz's case was appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court. Assistant
Illinois Attorney General Mary Brigid Kenney publicly denounced
the DuPage prosecutor's conduct and resigned rather than defend
Cruz's conviction and death penalty before the Supreme Court.
Nevertheless, the prosecutors filed a 150-page brief with the
state Supreme Court insisting that Brian Dugan's claims were not
credible.
In December of 1992 the Illinois Supreme Court upheld Cruz's
conviction and death sentence. Five months later, under new leadership,
the high court reversed itself and granted a rehearing of Cruz's
appeal. In July 1994 they granted his appeal and ordered a new
trial. By June 1995 the state Supreme Court had also upheld an
appellate decision for a retrial in Hernandez's case.
Unfazed, the DuPage prosecutors began Cruz's third trial in
October 1995. However, Cruz was quickly acquitted after the prosecutors'
story began to unravel. Sheriff's Lieutenant James Montesano admitted
on the witness stand that he was actually on vacation on the date
he supposedly discussed an incriminating statement made by Cruz
with another officer. Additional DNA tests excluded Cruz and confirmed
Dugan's guilt in the case.
In the aftermath of the collapse of the third Cruz prosecution,
public sentiment that the prosecutors had been conspiring to frame
Cruz became so pervasive that former Cook County Assistant State's
Attorney William Kunkle was appointed to investigate the DuPage
sheriffs and the prosecutor's office. In December, the prosecutors
announced they would not prosecute Alex Hernandez for a fourth
time.
In June 1996 a grand jury was convened to hear evidence of
possible crimes committed by the DuPage prosecutors and sheriffs.
Despite an internal sheriff's department investigation that found
no evidence of false testimony by detectives the grand jury returned
a 47-count indictment against three DuPage prosecutors and four
sheriff's officers.
A major issue in the case against the DuPage 7 was the fact
or fiction of an alleged dream statement made by Cruz
on May 9, 1983. Prosecutors claimed Cruz had described a dream
to sheriff's officers about the kidnapping and disclosed elements
that had not been made public and could only be known by the real
killer. However, this alleged statement was never reported in
the sheriffs' record of the discussion written up a day later.
In fact it was never documented, and it only emerged as a critical
part of the case immediately before the 1985 trial.
During the trial against the DuPage prosecutors and sheriff's
officers, Special Prosecutor William Kunkle gave a half dozen
reasons why jurors should conclude that the reports of a dream
statement was concocted by the authorities to frame Cruz.
Kunkle cited the testimony of Officer Kurzawa, who admitted
he had never been told not to write a police report about information
like the dream statement before May 9, 1983, or afterwards.
Kurzawa and another officer who allegedly heard the statement
testified they got in touch with Prosecutor Knight on the evening
of May 9, who told them not to include the statement in a police
report because he was going to use it in front of the grand jury
a couple of days later. But during the grand jury questioning,
prosecutor Knight never mentioned Cruz's alleged dream statement.
The defense attorneys argued that the prosecutors and police
had made some foolish mistakes, but these were not intentional
criminal acts or a criminal conspiracy. They also denounced Cruz
as a compulsive liar who may very well have been involved in the
crime or known who was involved. To say they don't have
a smoking gun is a gross understatement of this case,'' defense
attorney Terry Ekl said of Kunkle. My client [former prosecutor
Thomas Knight] is a smart guy. If he wanted to frame Rolando Cruz,
he would be dead right now.''
Despite a compelling case establishing the frame up of Rolando
Cruz, the jury did not convict the defendants. This, no doubt,
has something to do with the weight of a law-and-order atmosphere
that has been cultivated by right-wing politicians for some 20
years. From this viewpoint, no methods employed by prosecutors
or police can be considered too extreme because these forces are
supposedly the thin line that defends society from
uncivilized criminals. In such an atmosphere concern for the democratic
rights of those in the clutches of the police and prosecutors
is denounced as coddling criminals.
The jury in the wealthy DuPage County suburb appeared to accept
such a position. After their innocent verdict was delivered, the
jury left the courtroom, but many of them returned to join the
celebration of the indicted lawmen. A number of reporters commented
that they have never seen such a demonstration. Some jurors even
continued the celebration with the prosecutors and police at a
steak lounge until early the next morning.
The defendants were also aided by the favorable rulings of
trial judge William Kelly, who dropped charges against prosecutors
King and Kilander and then acquitted Officer Winkler in a bench
trial that coincided with the jury trial.
Rolando Cruz reacted to the acquittal four days later at the
federal courthouse in downtown Chicago where his lawyers were
filing papers to re-start his civil suit that had been put on
hold during the criminal proceedings. "It is not over, and
they know it is not over by a long shot," Cruz told a gathering
of reporters.
See Also:
The brutal
society: the death penalty and police brutality
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |