|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Niger takes on the trappings of civilian rule
By Brian Smith
29 July 1999
Use
this version to print
The West African state of Niger held a referendum July 18 on
a new civilian constitution for the country.
In April this year Niger President Ibrahim Barre Mainassara
was assassinated by his security guards in what was officially
described as "an unfortunate accident". Following the
coup, military chief Major Dauda Mallam Wanke established the
Council for National Reconciliation (CRN). The CRN scrapped the
old constitution, proposed a new one and promised to hand over
power to civilian rule by the end of the year. Elections are scheduled
for October and November, from which military officers (serving
and retired) are barred as candidates.
A majority of those voting in the July 18 referendum backed
the proposed constitution, but the turnout was very low with only
31 percent of four million registered voters going to the polling
booths. According to the Independent National Electoral Commission
(CENI), the turnout was as low as five percent in some regions.
CENI suggested this was partly because the vote came at a busy
time for farmers, in the midst of the rainy season, and that the
weather rendered polling stations inaccessible in three regions.
A more likely interpretation is widespread scepticism about the
turn to parliamentary rule and a belief that the proposed political
changes will do little to overcome the appalling level of poverty
that afflicts the mass of the people.
The new constitution proposes a form of power-sharing between
the president and the prime minister, described as a semi-presidential
regime. In the past there were continual conflicts between
the president and prime minister, who were from different parties,
which led to the coup of 1996 that brought Ibrahim Barre Mainassara
to power. The new constitution also provides for an amnesty for
those responsible for the coups of 1996 and 1999.
Pressure for the proposed constitutional changes is coming
from the United States and other major imperialist powers. Mainassara's
seizure of power in 1996 was widely welcomed by Western governments,
who hoped it would bring a measure of political stability to Niger.
A six-year debt repayment package was negotiated with the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank under the Heavily Indebted Poor
Countries (HIPC) debt relief scheme. Every aspect of the country's
economy was put under World Bank direction.
Government spending was severely cut and plans laid to privatise
state industry. The Western governments also demanded that moves
toward some form of civilian rule be instituted.
Six months after taking power, Mainassara organised a general
election, having promoted himself from colonel to general. His
own party, the National Salvation Council, won with 52 percent
of the vote, but the elections were widely regarded as rigged.
His unpopularity grew over the next three years as the social
and economic conditions of the majority of the population deteriorated.
Again under pressure from France and the United States, Mainassara
held local elections in February this year. Again there were reports
of vote rigging. Oppositionists were attacked and rounded up by
the military.
The day before Mainassara was assassinated the Supreme Court
had to annul the election results of certain districts because
of irregularities. At that time civil servants were on strike,
with pay arrears of six months outstanding.
More details of why Mainassara was shot by his security guards
have been put forward by the Independent of Ghana. The
paper explains that the main factor was the change in leadership
in Nigeria following the death of military dictator Sani Abacha.
The Independent interviewed "a number of Nigerian
business executives and Nigerian journalists" at a recent
world congress who have "unanimously disclosed that Mainassara
was killed because Abubakar [who took over from Abacha] had refused
to carry on to the letter an agreement by Nigerian former dictator,
General Abacha, to bankroll the security guards of Mainassara".
The Independent then states that "in the words
of the Nigerian participants, agitation amongst Mainassara's security
men rose to dizzy heights when, for four months, their monthly
salaries were delayed". Apparently Abacha paid the salaries
of security guards in a number of countries surrounding Nigeria
to help maintain his rule.
This Independent report does not address any connections
between the security guards and sections of the ruling elite in
Niger, or take into account the fact that their chief was none
other than Major Wanke.
Since coming to power in April, the transitional CRN government
has made clear its intention to abide by the demands of its imperialist
creditors and maintain debt repayments at whatever cost to the
Niger people. In May the newspaper Kakaki reported the
warning of Sidibe Seydou of the Finance Ministry: "It's a
question of compressing expenditure to get it down to the essential
items, and to put into effect all the measures necessary to improve
revenue and to save the program negotiated with the IMF and the
World Bank."
Seydou also observed that the budget for the next three months
shows expenditure of 58 million dollars, but anticipates revenues
of only 27 million dollars. He said the salaries of some senior
civil servants would be cut in half.
Approximately 43,000 civil servants are already owed eight
months back pay. The trade unions, unhappy with these salary cuts,
have broken the "social truce" that was declared when
the CRN took office. Teachers, health workers and university professors
have all been on strike in the last few months.
Captain Djbrilla Hima, spokesman for the CRN, has announced
that Niger will continue to make payments on its foreign debt
at the expense of salary arrears. Anticipating criticism, he declared:
"Those who think that one only has to stop repaying external
debts in order to pay salaries are mistaken. That would compromise
our structural adjustment program with the IMF and the World Bank,
and for us that is out of the question."
The World Bank has praised Niger for keeping economic reform
efforts "on course". Visiting World Bank officials are
said to be "particularly pleased with the transparency in
the privatisation of Niger's state enterprises", according
to Reuters.
Niger is an exceptionally impoverished country that relies
heavily on foreign assistance. For the most part, this was withdrawn
following the April coup. Niger had hoped for debt relief from
the G7's Jubilee 2000 plan, but was overlooked. With a population
of 10 million, Niger is almost twice the size of Texas and is
largely desert. It is ranked 173rd in the UN's annual report on
Human Developmentwith only Sierra Leone ranked lower.
Like many other impoverished ex-colonial countries, Niger is
in the untenable position of being instructed to repay enormous
debts and at the same time introduce "democratic reforms".
When the politics are not acceptable to Western governments, as
in Mainassara's rigged 1996 election or the assassination that
removed him from power earlier this year, the country is punished
with the withdrawal of aid.
The subservience of Niger's political and military elite to
IMF and World Bank demands ensures that the constitutional changes
will not lead to genuine democracy for the mass of workers and
peasants, whose conditions are to be made even worse. This can
only be imposed through military and police repression, whether
or not it is clothed in the formal trappings of civilian rule.
See Also:
Niger military assassinates
president
[13 April 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |