|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Salt Lake City bribery scandal: the buying of the Olympic
games
By Martin McLaughlin
13 January 1999
A bribery scandal has forced the resignation of the leaders
of the Salt Lake City group which is organizing the 2002 Winter
Olympics. The revelations of the past month have demonstrated
anew the pernicious consequences of the takeover of international
sport by giant corporations, especially the American-based media
monopolies.
Frank Joklik, president of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee
(SLOC), resigned January 8 after acknowledging that cash payments
and other benefits were provided to members of the International
Olympic Committee to influence the IOC's 1995 vote which awarded
the 2002 games to the Utah capital city.
Senior Vice President Dave Johnson also resigned, and SLOC
ended a $10,000-a-month consulting contract with its former president
Tom Welch, who headed the successful campaign to bring the Olympics
to Salt Lake City.
Three days later Salt Lake City Mayor Deedee Corradini announced
she would not seek reelection in 2000, as had been expected. While
Corradini, a Democrat, denied that her decision had anything to
do with the Olympics bribery scandal, over the past week city
council members had called for her resignation.
Four separate investigations have been launched into the allegations
of bribery, first raised last month by Marc Hodler, a senior IOC
member from Switzerland. The SLOC, the US Olympic Committee and
the IOC are all conducting internal probes, while the US Justice
Department is investigating whether federal anti-bribery statutes
have been violated, since many of the IOC members who allegedly
received payments are officials of foreign governments.
Some of the cash payments and other benefits have been confirmed
by the recipients. Jean-Claude Ganga, the IOC member from the
Congo Republic, admitted receiving $70,000 in direct payments,
as well as free medical care and a favorable position in a Utah
real estate deal, which netted him $60,000. Ganga described such
arrangements as "normal."
There are allegations that the SLOC supplied visiting IOC members
with prostitutes, that SLOC officials made campaign contributions
to an IOC member who was running for mayor of Santiago, Chile,
and that they provided college tuition for the children of IOC
members from Ecuador and Libya. A cash contribution went to another
IOC member from the Netherlands.
Hodler, the Swiss IOC official, charged that there has been
extensive bribery to influence IOC selection votes at least since
1990, when Atlanta was chosen as the host city for the 1996 Summer
Games. Similar scandals allegedly underlie the selection of Nagano,
Japan for the 1998 Winter Games and Sydney, Australia for the
2000 Summer Games.
Hodler said that several middlemen had profited handsomely
as brokers selling the votes of IOC members from Africa and the
Middle East, who had no hope of winning selection for sites in
their own regions but held the balance of votes in competition
between North American, European and Asian cities.
One of these middlemen was identified in the Canadian press
as Mahmoud El Farnawani, a former Egyptian Olympic athlete who
emigrated to Canada and became a successful Toronto businessman.
In recent years he has been hired as a "marketing consultant"
for a series of successful Olympic bids. The Sydney bid committee
paid him $60,000, although one Australian official complained
that he failed to deliver many votes. Salt Lake City's committee
paid him $58,000, and the group seeking the 2008 Summer Games
for Toronto has paid him $35,000.
The quadrennial games have always been a combination of athletic
competition, big business and international politics. Every Olympic
Games held during the post-World War II period served as an expression
of the tensions in international relations during the Cold War.
With the advent of television, and especially satellite transmission
of broadcasts in the 1960s, the games became increasingly commercialized
to produce profits and serve as a prestigious showcase for major
corporations.
Even in this context, however, the 1996 Atlanta games represented
a qualitative leap, with an unprecedented degree of corporate
involvement in exploitation of the spectacle, and a crude display
of American chauvinism. The IOC's decision in 1990 to award the
games to another US city, only six years after the 1984 Summer
Games in Los Angeles, raised questions at the time about the overpowering
influence of the American media monopolies.
Dick Pound, the IOC member from Montreal who is heading the
group's investigation of the Salt Lake City case, told the Canadian
press that the open bribery of IOC members was first employed
by Atlanta officials to displace Toronto, which had been the frontrunner
to receive the 1996 games.
Marc Hodler suggested that Salt Lake City might not be able
to fulfill its contract with the IOC to stage the 2002 games,
because the bribery scandal would make it more difficult to raise
the huge sums required. But top IOC officials reaffirmed the award
of the Winter Games, and Salt Lake officials said they had raised
72 percent of needed funds already.
The ultimate decision will be made, not by Olympic officials,
but by corporate America. A dozen major corporations which are
the principal sponsors of the Winter Games, including Coca-Cola,
Xerox, Visa, John Hancock Financial Services, Lucent Technologies,
Delta Airlines and US West, were reviewing their commitments.
US West announced it was withholding the first $5 million of its
planned $50 million contribution until the bribery allegations
were investigated.
See Also:
Some thoughts
about the 1998 Winter Olympics
[28 February 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |