|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Zimbabwe: Mugabe government abandons the rule of law
By Jean Shaoul
26 February 1999
Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe's president since independence from
Britain in 1980, has abandoned the rule of law and resorted to
outright dictatorship. His government faces mounting opposition
from all layers of society due to rapidly deteriorating economic
and social conditions, the failure to distribute land and the
war in the Congo.
Mugabe has arrested, jailed and tortured journalists, imposed
bans on the media, outlawed strikes and "stay-aways"
and allowed the military and the Central Intelligence Organisation
(CIO) to arrest and detain civilians. He has openly flouted court
orders and challenged judges to resign.
Two weeks ago, students boycotted classes and demonstrated
on the streets of Harare in protest over long overdue grants and
loans. They were the latest in a long line of groups--including
landless peasants, trade unionists, the church, human rights organisations,
judges and lawyers--expressing their opposition to Mugabe.
Unemployment has more than trebled since Mugabe came to power
19 years ago. In 1996 only 11 percent of the population was formally
employed. Real income per capita has plummeted. By the beginning
of this year it had fallen by one-third since 1979. Inflation
last year was more than 50 percent and interest rates are well
over 40 percent. The value of the Zimbabwe dollar has fallen by
more than 65 percent in the last year.
HIV/AIDS has taken a terrible toll. With 25 percent of people
aged 15 to 49 infected with the HIV virus, Zimbabwe is the worst
affected country in Africa. Pregnant women are infected at a 20
to 50 percent rate, and about one-third of these women will pass
the virus on to their babies.
The land question has long been the central and most controversial
issue in Zimbabwe. Despite the repeal of the 1969 Land Tenure
Act-- which reserved 50 percent of the land, including the most
fertile arable land, for whites--30 percent is still owned by
4,000 white commercial farmers. The overwhelming majority have
insufficient land to feed themselves and their families. In 1992,
a Land Acquisition Act was supposed to provide for the acquisition
of up to half of all white-owned land for redistribution, but
white farmers appealed and put a stop to it in 1995. Faced with
mounting opposition and riots of starving peasants, in which six
people were shot dead by the security forces in 1997-98, the government
again sought to redistribute some of the land without compensation.
Opposition from white farmers and the International Monetary Fund
brought this to a halt.
Zimbabwe's decision to go to war to protect Congo's President
Laurent Kabila in 1998 has proved costly. The Kabila regime owes
it $93 million for weapons and equipment and the government held
out hopes of lucrative new markets at the end of the war. While
a few well-connected businessmen have benefited, the masses have
born a terrible financial and social cost. It is estimated that
an incredible 80 percent of Zimbabwe's armed forces in the Congo
are infected with HIV. For years the army was closely aligned
with Mugabe's ZANU-PF party. But the war is hugely unpopular within
the armed forces.
With wages failing to keep up with inflation, strikes have
increased. In 1996 there were major strikes in health and other
services. Protests by veterans from the eight-year-long military
operations in the Mozambique war forced the government to make
payments of Z$3.5 billion. In 1998 food price increases sparked
the worst riots in Harare since independence. The Zimbabwe Congress
of Trade Unions (ZCTU) held one-day strikes at the end of last
year to demand that the government cut its spending on the Congolese
war and lower inflation and interest rates. Mugabe responded by
declaring strikes illegal.
In mid-January, Standard newspaper editor Mark Chavunduka
and reporter Ray Choto were illegally detained and tortured after
writing a story about a failed military coup. Mugabe initiated
a campaign of harassment against the press, which has met widespread
opposition.
The Supreme Court wrote to the president urging him to uphold
the rule of law, carry out three High Court orders to release
the journalists and not use the CIO to arrest and detain civilians.
Mugabe went on television to launch a vitriolic attack on the
judges and journalists. "If the Standard had not behaved
in such a blatantly dishonest and unethical manner, the army would
not have acted in the way it did," he declared. The two journalists
have since been charged under the Law and Order Maintenance Act,
used by the colonial Rhodesian government to suppress opposition.
Mugabe challenged the judges to resign, saying that they had
no right to instruct him to do anything and that, because of their
biased petition, the government could no longer trust them on
any case involving the executive.
Lawyers demonstrated outside the parliament against Mugabe's
flagrant flouting of Zimbabwe's laws. The IMF is now talking about
delaying the release of crucial financial aid to the country.
From the IMF's perspective, the problem is not the social catastrophe
engulfing the Zimbabwean workers and peasants, but the threat
to profits and debt repayments from increasing political instability.
Mugabe and his ZANU-PF party reaches into every corner of Zimbabwe's
society. ZANU-PF controls 147 out of parliament's 150 seats and
there is no effective opposition party. There is a network of
CIO agents throughout the urban and rural areas. Corruption, fraud
and mismanagement are widespread.
Many sections of society are opposed to Mugabe and calling
for his removal. Parallels have begun to be drawn with Indonesia
and Suharto. Yet this was one of the men who led the struggle
for political independence in Zimbabwe and was nominated for a
Nobel Peace Prize in 1980.
The transformation of leaders such as Mugabe into venal despots
expresses the antagonistic relationship of the national bourgeoisie
to the oppressed masses of workers and peasants. None of the states
in Africa created by de-colonisation have been able to evolve
along genuinely democratic lines, redistribute the land and satisfy
the aspirations of the masses. Far from seeking to overthrow the
existing social order, the national bourgeoisie took the place
of the old colonial rulers in exploiting the country's working
class and natural resources while to a growing degree acting as
the political agents for the interests of the imperialist governments
and transnational corporations.
Zimbabwe was ruled for decades as a fiefdom by the British
South Africa Company, which owned the rights to all the gold and
minerals under the concessions extracted from the Ndebele ruler
by Cecil Rhodes. As Southern Rhodesia, based on agriculture and
mining, it only became a self-governing colony within the British
Empire in 1923. It formed a federation with neighbouring African
states in 1953. When in the late 1950s and 1960s all the other
African states were gaining political independence from their
colonial rulers and establishing their own bourgeois nationalist
regimes, the white settlers in Southern Rhodesia held out against
black majority rule. In 1965 the Smith government unilaterally
declared its independence from Britain.
The sanctions that followed independence led to the economic
isolation of the country, tight state controls over the economy
and dependence on buccaneering outfits like Tiny Rowland's Lonrho
Corporation. Opposition came from increasingly militant nationalist
organisations: the Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU) led
by Joshua Nkomo and strong among the Ndebele people; and the Zimbabwe
African National Union (ZANU), later led by Mugabe, which became
the focus for the Shona people.
In 1979 the Smith government was forced to accept a deal worked
out at Lancaster House in London, and Mugabe's ZANU party swept
to power in the 1980 elections. While Nkomo and other ZAPU leaders
joined Mugabe's cabinet, they were dismissed in the mid-1980s
when the army ruthlessly suppressed the opposition in Matabeleland.
Soon after independence, the government retreated behind the
same economic controls as the Smith regime, restricting imports
and the movement of foreign exchange. The increased military spending
on the internal war against the Ndebele and the external war in
Mozambique, and health and other social services led to huge government
debts equivalent to 10 percent of GDP.
In 1990 the government was forced to abandon the protection
of its domestic economy in return for foreign aid, introduce an
economic structural adjustment programme (ESAP), trade liberalisation
and privatisation of state owned enterprises. The ESAP has been
nothing more than the organised looting and pillage of the country
on behalf of international finance capital.
A huge balance of payments crisis and a 40 percent devaluation
followed. Repeated droughts and famine led to the further impoverishment
of the masses, re-igniting the land question as only the commercial
farmers had access to irrigation. In 1997 the trade deficit reached
US$700 million, equivalent to 9 percent of GDP. Increased borrowing
from the IMF and commercial banks means that total debt is now
57 percent of GDP. The level of interest payments and repayment
of old debt means that net inflows are barely positive.
See Also:
Tiny Rowland:
No longer the "Unacceptable Face of Capitalism"
[29 July 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |