|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
The continued drastic impact of the AIDS epidemic on sub-Saharan
Africa
By Barry Mason
19 August 1999
Use
this version to print
Sub-Saharan Africa is the epicentre of the AIDS epidemic, having
two-thirds of the world's current cases. Zimbabwe and Zambia lie
at the core of this area. The social and economic consequences
of this epidemic continue to erode the viability of these countries.
The South African Mail and Guardian of August 16 explains
how the AIDS epidemic is affecting food production in Zimbabwe.
An article quoted figures compiled by the Commercial Farmers'
Union. Maize production is down by 61 percent, cotton by 47 percent
and vegetables by 49 percent. Many of the adults who are sick,
or have died from AIDS, are the ones who would normally work on
the agricultural smallholdings. Those left are either too young
or too old to cope with the tasks, or they are left to care for
the ones dying from AIDS.
In the article, Kerry Kay, AIDS co-ordinator at the Commercial
Farmers' Union, attacked the government over its response to the
AIDS crisis. Kay explained that the government was spending Z$70
million (US$1.84 million) a month on the war in the Democratic
Republic of Congo and only Z$1 million (US$262,000) a month on
AIDS prevention. In Zimbabwe, more than half of the maize that
forms the staple diet is grown on smallholdings. Exports crops
are also being hit; half the cotton and tobacco for export is
also grown on smallholdings. The article explains how, in the
communal areas, women left widowed by AIDS are growing less food.
They have no money to hire tractors or extra labour and have had
to use savings and sell tools and animals to buy medical help
and pay for funerals.
A similar disaster can be seen in Uganda. The incidence of
HIV/AIDS is highest in the coffee growing areas around Lake Victoria,
where there are not enough adults to tend the coffee plantations.
The Mail and Guardian quote Godfrey Ssewankambo of the
Uganda's Women's Effort for Orphans: From the time one adult
family member is bedridden, AIDS compromises the nutrition and
food security of the whole family. If the wife has to care
for her sick husband she has less time to tend their farm. Family
savings are spent on medicines, trips to hospital, etc. A downward
spiral sets in. If the woman then becomes ill or dies the whole
process is exacerbated. Often the family is reduced to just subsistence
level.
Gary Howe, director for Africa at the International Fund for
Agricultural Development, said, The bottom line is that
AIDS causes an acute shortage of labour and tremendous dependency
on households headed by females and the elderly.
The British Economist magazine of August 14, 1999 details
the impact AIDS is having in Zambia. According to the Zambian
Health Minister, AIDS will eventually kill half his country's
population. Most of those dying are mothers or breadwinners, leaving
many children orphaned. Estimates of children under 15 losing
one or more parent through AIDS range from 13 percent to 50 percent
of all Zambian children.
It is estimated that 72 percent of all Zambian households are
caring for one or more orphans. The poverty exacerbated by AIDS
is having an enormous impact on children in Zambia. Half of them
are so malnourished that their growth is stunted. A fifth are
severely malnourished, leading to lack of mental development.
Education does not exist for many children, with 50 percent of
rural children and 68 percent of rural orphans not attending school.
AIDS has led to a dramatic increase in homeless children. It
is thought that about 90,000 children live on the streets or in
the bush in Zambia. Many try to survive by recycling bottles,
or are forced into petty theft. To dull their senses to the night
cold, they are reduced to sniffing fermented sewage, not being
able to afford to buy glue.
The copper mining areas of Northern Zambia are particularly
hard hit. In the main hospital in Ndola, two-thirds of the patients
are dying from AIDS. Unemployment in the area is endemic. Thousands
of workers are being sacked from the mines. Many who lose their
jobs also face homelessness as they live in mine-owned houses.
Poverty in this area is so great that recently buried corpses
in the cemeteries are often dug up to strip them of the smart
suits in which they are often buried.
South Africa has 3.6 million people infected with AIDS, and
this increases by 1,500 each day. An article in the South African
Mail and Guardian in July described the country's AIDS policy
as a disaster.
The number of cases has increased 30-fold since 1990. Quarraisha
Abdool Karim, an AIDS researcher at the Medical Research Council,
says the HIV epidemic has been explosive, and she
takes the government to task for its inadequate response. Despite
the commitment of the democratically elected government of 1994
to the HIV epidemic by allocating substantial human and financial
resources, the scale and magnitude of those efforts have not been
sufficient to turn the epidemic around.
As elsewhere, it is young, economically active adults who bear
the brunt of the disease. UNAIDS estimates that by 2010 between
25 percent and 30 percent of adults will be infected. The vast
majority will be black and poor, and will die within five to eight
years of contracting the disease. By 2010 there will be 700,000
orphans of the disease.
Dr. Robert Shell, Director of Population Research at Rhodes
University, also attacked the South African government's policy.
He singled out the former health minister, Nkosazana Zuma, saying,
She's up there in my mind as a war criminal. While she was
persuading the country to give up smoking, the country sank into
a deadly epidemic that will wipe out every single development
gain we've made. This is going to take 25 years to work itself
out, and if there was a cure tomorrow, it wouldn't help.
The ANC government elected in 1994 concentrated on primary
healthcare. Emphasis was placed on clinics rather than the
hospitals. But these clinics are not equipped to deal with AIDS
patients and discourage them from attending. The Guardian and
Mail quotes a doctor at Baragwanath: Many of the nurses
hear a person has AIDS and figure, they're going to die
anyway, I won't waste medicine on them.' They give them two aspirins
and send them home.
AIDS patients turn to the hospitals for treatment, but the
policy of encouraging primary care means hospital services are
being cut back. Often it is AIDS clinics within the hospitals,
such as the one at the University of Pretoria Academic Hospital,
that are being closed. The AIDS clinic at Johannesburg General
Hospital faces losing a quarter of its staff in spite of only
having five full-time healthcare staff for 150 patients. Dr. David
Spencer of the Johannesburg General Hospital clinic told the Mail
and Guardian: It was their [the hospital administrators']
feeling because of the hospital's financial difficulties, we should
be diverting HIV-infected patients away from the hospital, rather
than attracting them. But where will they go?
See Also:
Africa
[WSWS Full Coverage]
HIV/AIDS
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |