|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: The
Balkan Crisis
The Kosovo refugee crisis and the Holocaust: How the German
government defends its military policy
By Ulrich Rippert
16 April 1999
Three weeks of permanent air attacks by NATO have been insufficient
to bring Serbia to heel. The commanders of the Alliance forces
have reacted with intensified air strikes and preparations for
the intervention of ground troops. Increasingly it is civilian
targets which are being identified and hit in the strikes. The
NATO war is rapidly developing into a form of general terror against
the Serb population.
At the same time the doubts and questions regarding the purpose
of the war have grown. The original propaganda, which claimed
that the offensive was being waged for humanitarian purposes,
has long since been overtaken by reality. The editor of Germany's
major news magazine Der Spiegel has posed the question:
"What are we doing in the Balkans?" The co-editor of
the weekly Die Zeit newspaper, Theo Summer, asks: "Is
there the danger of a fiasco?" and hesitatingly but clearly
answers his own question in the affirmative. Former SPD (Social
Democratic Party) chancellor Helmut Schmidt has delivered his
own devastating judgement: "International law has been broken
at the behest of the Americans. This war is a mistake." Even
the ultra-patriotic Bild newspaper has expressed doubts:
"Is the war correct?"
Under these conditions the ruling German coalition government
of the SPD and the Greens have pulled out all the stops and begun
a propaganda campaign which, in terms of demagogy and manipulation,
puts all previous efforts in the shade.
Defence Minister Rudolf Scharping (SPD), up until now a colourless
political technocrat with sleep-inducing rhetoric and the charisma
of an office manager, suddenly functions as the principal demagogue
for the military brass.
At the first press conference, immediately following the beginning
of the war, Scharping delivered a warning to journalists, demanding
that they openly exercise self-censorship. Every word critical
of the NATO offensive must be avoided, he argued, because it would
strengthen the enemy, prolong the war and therefore lead to increasing
numbers of victims amongst the NATO and German troops. However,
this attempt to revive the infamous "Dolchstoß"
Legend* showed little signs of working. Critical voices became
louder.
Over the past few days the government has stepped up the war
of words. Now, according to Defence Minister Scharping and Foreign
Minister Joschka Fischer, the behaviour of Slobodan Milosevic
must be compared to the "inhuman activities of Adolf Hitler".
Fischer declared to journalists that the actions of the Serb militias
against the drained and exhausted refugees reminded him of the
worst pictures of the burning down of the Warsaw ghetto. "For
the first time in this century Germany is on the right side,"
Fischer added. And at every available opportunity Scharping has
repeated his formula that the "unimaginable cruelty in Kosovo
recalls the twisted face of Germany's past".
With increasing clarity they draw a parallel with the National
Socialist holocaust. Every press statement by the foreign and
defence ministries is loaded with the appropriate vocabulary:
"massacres, slaughterhouses, selection, concentration camp,
mountains of bodies".
Der Spiegel reported a week ago on a "media offensive"
by the defence ministry aimed at defusing the growing criticism.
"Air reconnaissance photos must prove the existence of concentration
camps in Kosovo. Scharping and the chancellor's office have ordered
the urgent acquisition of such items of evidence.... Since last
Monday the German army sends out unmanned reconnaissance planes
stationed in Macedonia, Tornados are also taking part in the search....
As soon as the photographic evidence has been acquired the government
intends to use it to justify its war effort. In this way the Russians
will also be publicly put under pressure. The search continued
until the middle of the week without success. A German reconnaissance
plane took photos of the sports stadium in Pristina--an alleged
concentration camp--but the stadium was empty."
The daily press conferences by the defence ministry are aimed
exclusively at issuing instructions, not providing information.
Any critical questions are sharply rebuffed. Die Zeit questioned:
"What lay behind the furious eruptions--on one occasion by
Fischer, another time by Scharping--merely because the media were
not willing to clearly distinguish between perpetrator and victim,
were not prepared to accept as fact the 'cynicism', the 'mountains
of bodies', the 'concentration camps' or 'the slaughter house'?"
Any comparison between Milosevic's soldiers and the bunch of
murderers organised in the SA and the SS, or the drawing of parallels
between the present refugee camps and the destruction chambers
of the Nazis, involves a massive distortion of history.
Six million Jews were systematically and brutally murdered
in the concentration camps. Whoever then draws a parallel with
the present repression of the Kosovars in fact derides the victims
of the Holocaust. Such a belittling of the crimes of the Nazis
comes close to a denial of the Holocaust itself.
In Yugoslavia the crimes of the Nazis during the Second World
War assumed monstrous proportions. In Croatia, under the supervision
of the Nazis, the Ustasha carried out a systematic massacre of
the Serb people. In the biggest of the 20 concentration camps
800,000 people were murdered. In Serbia the German army sought
to break the resistance by shooting first 50 and later 100 civilians
selected at random for every one dead German soldier. In October
1941 the commanding German army general for Serbia, Franz Böhme,
reported that for the 21 German soldiers killed in exchanges with
the partisans, 21,000 Serbs--men, women and children--had been
shot.
In light of this history it is no surprise that the Serb people
have little inclination to believe that the NATO bombs being dropped
on their heads today are for their own good.
What is taking place at present in Kosovo has roots which differ
from those of the Nazi terror. Leaving aside the issue
that many totally unsubstantiated rumours and accusations
of mass terror are treated as facts by the media, nevertheless
it is clear that a systematic and violent expulsion is being carried
out by the government in Belgrade. These violent actions by Milosevic
must be condemned, but unfortunately they correspond to a pattern
which has been repeated in many countries in the post-war period.
The response of the German government with regard to such developments
is, however, highly selective.
Fifty years ago the state of Israel was established through
the brutal expulsion and suppression of the Palestinians. In Turkey
the government has refused to acknowledge the right of existence
of the Kurdish minority and has destroyed 3,000 Kurdish villages.
In this regard, it is in no respect any better than the Milosevic
government in Belgrade, but nevertheless enjoys membership in
NATO and financial and military assistance from the German government.
The government is also equally one-sided and arbitrary with
regard to the expulsions in the Balkans--its policy varying according
to its own immediate interests. The April 8 edition of the Frankfurter
Rundschau drew attention to this point in an article by
Pierre Simonitsch titled: "A History of Expulsions".
Simonitsch wrote that the history of the Balkans was "always
a history of expulsions and mass murders", the only exception
being the years of the Tito government. At the beginning of the
nineties the German government played a key role in re-igniting
national conflicts when it insisted on the recognition of Slovenia
and Croatia as independent states. Simonitsch wrote: "The
situation is dramatic. But not exactly new for the Balkans. One
had forgotten the 600,000 Serbs, who since 1991 had fled Croatia
and Bosnia-Herzegovina. With NATO logistical support the Croat
army drove 200,000 Serbs from Krajina where they had lived for
250 years. Many of them were lodged in army barracks, where they
can become unintentional targets for NATO bombers."
In light of these considerations Simonitsch poses the justified
question of whether the German government was really so surprised
by the events in Kosovo as it claims to be today: "Did the
Western governments consciously take into account the expulsion
of the Kosovar Albanians when they ordered the air attacks against
the rest of Yugoslavia? It is difficult to believe that the NATO
strategists overlooked the possible consequences of their plans.
Instead of preventing a human tragedy the bombings have had the
opposite affect."
That the German government adopts an increasingly grotesque
demagogy and falsification of history results from the fact that
it is attempting to defend a war which is indefensible. At the
start it was: "For humanity!", but the bombing brought
destruction and waste. Then came the slogan: "Stop the expulsions!"
under conditions where the air strikes became the cover for the
biggest expulsions in recent history. Now they just say: "For
or against fascism!" What a declaration of political bankruptcy!
*After the First World War reactionary, nationalist
forces claimed that Germany lost the war not because it was militarily
defeated at the front, but because it was stabbed in the back
("Dolchstoß") by socialist and communist minded
workers at home.
See Also:
What does the bombing of Kosovar refugees
say about NATO's "humanitarian" war?
[16 April 1999]
As Washington escalates air war
US-NATO jets bomb Kosovan civilians
[15 April 1999]
The US and ethnic cleansing--the case
of Croatia
[15 April 1999]
What would be the consequences of a US
declaration of war on Yugoslavia?
[15 April 1999]
What will be left of Yugoslavia after
the bombing?
[13 April 1999]
War in
the Balkans
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |